[firebird-support] Antivirus Exclusions

2016-04-05 Thread tcanfiel...@hotmail.com [firebird-support]
I'm trying to set the exclusions for one of our servers and I see Firebird running. I don't have any experience with this program and I was hoping someone on the forum could shed some light on the needed exclusions. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks Tim

[firebird-support] install firebird 3 superclasic in linux

2016-04-05 Thread 'Ismael L. Donis Garcia' sli...@citricos.co.cu [firebird-support]
as I can install firebird 3 superclasic in linux? I want to try it on devuan Best Regards | ISMAEL |

Re: [firebird-support] lock conflict deadlock

2016-04-05 Thread Alexey Kovyazin a...@ib-aid.com [firebird-support]
Hi Sergio, Definitely there should transaction which produces conflict, probably your query does not catch it. You can track it with Monlogger - download HQbird, install it and register as trial (14 days), then connect with MonLogger to your database and at the moment of error message click

Re: [firebird-support] lock conflict deadlock

2016-04-05 Thread shg_siste...@yahoo.com.ar [firebird-support]
sorry, I just copied a part of the select in the message. I do include that flag in the actual select. Here it is the complete select. I'm sending '-1' in "in_trans" select ma.mon$attachment_id, mt.mon$transaction_id, ma.mon$server_pid,

Re: [firebird-support] lock conflict deadlock

2016-04-05 Thread liviuslivius liviusliv...@poczta.onet.pl [firebird-support]
Hi,   chow do you check that transaction is readonly? in your select this field is not included   regards, karol Bieniaszewski     W dniu 2016-04-05 15:29:11 użytkownik shg_siste...@yahoo.com.ar [firebird-support] napisał:   Hello! I'm having a problem which I

[firebird-support] lock conflict deadlock

2016-04-05 Thread shg_siste...@yahoo.com.ar [firebird-support]
Hello! I'm having a problem which I don't undestand. I'm getting a deadlock error in my app, but when I see the active transactions (I attach the select I'm using) I see all read-only transactions active. So, the question is: How can I get a deadlock error when I have just read-only

Re: [firebird-support] RE: unsubscribe

2016-04-05 Thread Mark Rotteveel m...@lawinegevaar.nl [firebird-support]
On 2016-04-04 9:08, Hasnain Najafi hasnain.naj...@boots.co.uk [firebird-support] wrote: > unsubscribe > > Regards, > > HARDWARE REFRESH TEAM To unsubscribe send a mail to firebird-support-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com with subject: Unsubscribe Mark

Re: [firebird-support] Timestamp conversion issue

2016-04-05 Thread Mark Rotteveel m...@lawinegevaar.nl [firebird-support]
On 2016-04-05 10:47, Alex Castillo acr_k...@yahoo.com [firebird-support] wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I'm having some issues with a stored procedure. This is a legacy > development, so the time was stored in a varchar field and the date > in > a timestamp field. > > The issue stills happens

Re: [firebird-support] Re: Update big table and nbackup benefit or not?

2016-04-05 Thread liviuslivius liviusliv...@poczta.onet.pl [firebird-support]
Karol, if you worry about database size after update, i could suggest to split huge update by few smaller, each in own transaction and garbage collect between passes. I.e. something like update t set ... where id between 0 and N; commit; select count(*) from t where id between 0 and N; commit;

Re: Re: [firebird-support] Update big table and nbackup benefit or not?

2016-04-05 Thread liviuslivius liviusliv...@poczta.onet.pl [firebird-support]
W dniu 2016-04-05 12:45:34 użytkownik Dimitry Sibiryakov s...@ibphoenix.com [firebird-support] napisał: > 05.04.2016 12:43, liviuslivius liviusliv...@poczta.onet.pl [firebird-support] > wrote: > > but what happens at merge stage (delta merging) when i unlock

Re: [firebird-support] Update big table and nbackup benefit or not?

2016-04-05 Thread Dimitry Sibiryakov s...@ibphoenix.com [firebird-support]
05.04.2016 12:43, liviuslivius liviusliv...@poczta.onet.pl [firebird-support] wrote: > but what happens at merge stage (delta merging) when i unlock database? > page will be overriden or new one will be created and old will be marked as > empty? Old pages will be overwritten, new ones will

[firebird-support] Re: Update big table and nbackup benefit or not?

2016-04-05 Thread hv...@users.sourceforge.net [firebird-support]
Karol, if you worry about database size after update, i could suggest to split huge update by few smaller, each in own transaction and garbage collect between passes. I.e. something like update t set ... where id between 0 and N; commit; select count(*) from t where id between 0 and N; commit;

Re: [firebird-support] Update big table and nbackup benefit or not?

2016-04-05 Thread Dimitry Sibiryakov s...@ibphoenix.com [firebird-support]
05.04.2016 10:21, liviuslivius liviusliv...@poczta.onet.pl [firebird-support] wrote: > what is the answer for this A or B? None of them. Full pages are written to delta file, so you'll have database in exactly the same state as per scenario 1. -- WBR, SD.

[firebird-support] Timestamp conversion issue

2016-04-05 Thread Alex Castillo acr_k...@yahoo.com [firebird-support]
Hello everyone, I'm having some issues with a stored procedure. This is a legacy development, so the time was stored in a varchar field and the date in a timestamp field. The issue stills happens after the upgrade from 2.1.5 to 2.1.7 on linux open suse 11.4 x64, classic engine. However, this

Re: Re: [firebird-support] Update big table and nbackup benefit or not?

2016-04-05 Thread liviuslivius liviusliv...@poczta.onet.pl [firebird-support]
Hi,   thanks Tim for warning - i know fragmenting records are bad but in my case this probably not happen because this is ppmxl database with numbers only    but do you know what will be answer A or B? If no one answers I'll have to test yourself ;-)   regards, Karol Bieniaszewski     If the

Re: [firebird-support] Update big table and nbackup benefit or not?

2016-04-05 Thread Tim Ward t...@telensa.com [firebird-support]
If the update makes the records longer (after run-length encoding) it's even more fun, as you might get fragmentation (of records across pages) and access times can then increase by a very large factor indeed, even to the extent of completely crippling the performance of an entire application.

[firebird-support] Update big table and nbackup benefit or not?

2016-04-05 Thread liviuslivius liviusliv...@poczta.onet.pl [firebird-support]
Hi,   i must update big table 100 GB and as we know when we do update then new record version will be created. scenarion 1:   1. Table size 100GB (db size 200GB) 2. Update field in all records generate 100GB new record versions 3. table size after is 200GB (db size 300GB) 4. sweep remove 100GB and

Re: [firebird-support] db corruption

2016-04-05 Thread Rik van Kekem r...@graficalc.nl [firebird-support]
'Andrew Zenz' and...@aimsoftware.com.au [firebird-support] wrote: > FYI FirstAID scanned the database and identified 2 tables as having > corruption. I attempted a data pump with DBW excluding those 2 tables > but it failed on several other tables, tables that FirstAID claims are > clean. The