Hi Geoff,
Helen Borrie hele...@iinet.net.au [firebird-support] wrote:
At 02:36 p.m. 30/10/2014, Geoff Worboys
ge...@telesiscomputing.com.au [firebird-support] wrote:
Doesn't that depend on how they implemented the separate threads?
SS does/can use different threads for separate connections
] firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
Do: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
Temat: Odp: [firebird-support] Performance of Firebird (Superserver vs
Superclassic, etc.)
Data: śr., paź 29, 2014 23:19
There are 46,527 records in the main table, but the calculation touches many
other tables. Here
'Thomas Steinmaurer' t...@iblogmanager.com [firebird-support] wrote:
I once did a short video with a very simple/naive SMP
capability test across SS and SC.
http://www.iblogmanager.com/download/demos/firebird/fb25_architectures_smp.html
Although with SS internally requests to the same
On Oct 29, 2014, at 9:36 PM, Geoff Worboys ge...@telesiscomputing.com.au
[firebird-support] firebird-support@yahoogroups.com wrote:
Doesn't that depend on how they implemented the separate threads?
SS does/can use different threads for separate connections to the
same database, can't it?
Thought I would share some experience we have gained recently.
We have an application consisting of a C++ Builder front end and Firebird 2.5
as the backend. Running on Windows. The database includes a ton of stored
procedures with some fairly intricate calculations.
A typical installation
Hi Todd,
Thought I would share some experience we have gained recently.
We have an application consisting of a C++ Builder front end and
Firebird 2.5 as the backend. Running on Windows. The database includes
a ton of stored procedures with some fairly intricate calculations.
A typical
Hi Todd,
There are 46,527 records in the main table, but the calculation touches
many other tables. Here is a copy of the analysis of the main procedure
from IB Expert:
Query
Plan
Query
t...@camalot.ca [firebird-support] wrote:
Thought I would share some experience we have gained
recently.
We have an application consisting of a C++ Builder front end
and Firebird 2.5 as the backend. Running on Windows.
[...]
Also, we had always run Firebird as Superserver.
[...]
At 12:59 p.m. 30/10/2014, Geoff Worboys ge...@telesiscomputing.com.au
[firebird-support] wrote:
Is it safe to assume that, when you were running SuperServer,
you had edited firebird.conf to change the installation default
CpuAffinityMask from 1 to 15 ? (So that it would use all 4 of
your
Helen Borrie hele...@iinet.net.au [firebird-support] wrote:
At 12:59 p.m. 30/10/2014, Geoff Worboys
ge...@telesiscomputing.com.au [firebird-support] wrote:
Is it safe to assume that, when you were running SuperServer,
you had edited firebird.conf to change the installation default
Helen Borrie hele...@iinet.net.au [firebird-support] wrote:
At 12:59 p.m. 30/10/2014, Geoff Worboys
ge...@telesiscomputing.com.au [firebird-support] wrote:
Is it safe to assume that, when you were running SuperServer,
you had edited firebird.conf to change the installation default
Helen Borrie hele...@iinet.net.au [firebird-support] wrote:
At 02:36 p.m. 30/10/2014, Geoff Worboys
ge...@telesiscomputing.com.au [firebird-support] wrote:
Doesn't that depend on how they implemented the separate threads?
SS does/can use different threads for separate connections to the
same
12 matches
Mail list logo
