Dear FIS colleagues,
Though this is my first post I will spare my introduction to keep the
message short. For now I'd simply like to thank everyone for the
stimulating conversations and share a few thoughts regarding the current
discussion, in which I sympathize with Krassimir, Bob, and others
unc
Dear Bob.
I agree 100%. We must classify information in abiotic and biotic, but, in
my opinion, both are parts of "information".
Some scientists, including Tom Stonier, tried to define information
considering the syntactic and semantic aspects of information.
Can we draw a parallel between these co
On 26 Mar 2017, at 16:30, Bob Logan wrote:
Hello Krassimir - I agree with the sentiments you expressed - they
seem to parallel my thoughts.
I am often puzzled by the use of the term ‘information’ in the way
it is often used by physicists re the info of material objects . The
way the ter
Hello Krassimir - I agree with the sentiments you expressed - they seem to
parallel my thoughts.
I am often puzzled by the use of the term ‘information’ in the way it is often
used by physicists re the info of material objects . The way the term
information is used in physics such as Wheelers
Dear Brian, Arturo, Karl, Alex, Lars-Goran, Gyuri, and FIS colleagues,
Thank you for your remarks!
What is important is that every theory has its own understanding of the
concepts it uses.
For “foreigners”, theirs meaning may be strange or unknown.
Some times, concepts of one theory contradict t
gyuri, how can we get online or email access to your article on how
inanimate things exchange information?
with warmth and oomph--howard
ps i believe i'm in the volume for the information summit in vienna with
you. but if you get me a word or pdf version of your article, i can upload
it
