@listas.unizar.es
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 12:16 AM
Subject: Re: [Fis] Tactilizing processing
Quoting Stanley N Salthe ssal...@binghamton.edu:
Bob -- I think that 'coupling over such a disparity in scale' is not
really
going on differently in biology either. The only messages that could
u...@umces.edu
To: Stanley N Salthe ssal...@binghamton.edu
Cc: fis@listas.unizar.es
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 12:16 AM
Subject: Re: [Fis] Tactilizing processing
Quoting Stanley N Salthe ssal...@binghamton.edu:
Bob -- I think that 'coupling over such a disparity in scale' is not
really
At 09:13 AM 01/11/2010, Loet Leydesdorff wrote:
Dear colleagues,
It seems to me that we have a more elaborated apparatus for discussing the
distances of a perturbation across a number of interfaces.
Two information processing systems can be considered as structurally
coupled when the one cannot
Dear colleagues,
It seems to me that mechanism other than synchronization in the physical
domain can be specified -- which one could metaphorically also call
synchronization. For example, in interhuman communication codification
enables us to globalize the communication.
Best wishes,
Loet
On
Hi All,
I appreciate this topic and discussion. I find myself in strong agreement
with the basic point made by Stan and Bob. Not all fluctuations penetrate
upwardly across levels of functional organization. Structural resonance in
the organization at some level makes it sensitive to certain
Quoting Stanley N Salthe ssal...@binghamton.edu:
Bob -- I think that 'coupling over such a disparity in scale' is not really
going on differently in biology either. The only messages that could
'percolate upwards' in a material system would be those the higher level(s)
are prepared to
Bob --
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Robert Ulanowicz u...@umces.edu wrote
Subject: Re: [Fis] Tactilizing processing
To: Stanley N Salthe ssal...@binghamton.edu
Cc: u...@cbl.umces.edu
Quoting Stanley N Salthe ssal...@binghamton.edu:
I suggested that a single small scale
Stan said:
Folks -- As one who has been puzzling about the "relations between the
microworld and the macroworld" for some time, and who is in the middle
of studying Conrad's 1996 paper on fluctuons, I am wondering, and would
ask Jorge, if it is not case that macro - micro communication is
one
Dear Stan Joseph,
Many thanks for your responses and for your interest in my naive
comments. My interpretation of M. Conrad views in that wonderful
abstract is that most molecular recognition events are per se isolated
or followed by some very specific pathway. Then in many cases an
Jorge -- Then, it is hard to get away from the model where, in 'downward
causation', large scale signals impact simultaneously many small scale
processes, while in upward causation, small scale signals need to accumulate
into some kind of ensemble message. But Conrad 'fluctuons' seem to be
trying
Dear FIS
people,
As a new
comer to Systems Biology and graduated in Chemical Engineering, I can
say
little (and understand only a little bit) about the fluctuon model. May
I say
that personally I find far more interesting the pioneering ideas of M.
Conrad
on molecular bio-computing, which
11 matches
Mail list logo
