Trust me. You are in good company.
Steven
> On Jun 14, 2015, at 5:22 PM, Marcus Abundis <55m...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From Loet's post:
> >During the recent conference in Vienna, I was amazed how many of our
> >colleagues wish to ground information in physics.<
> I would say that I was disap
Amen.
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Marcus Abundis <55m...@gmail.com> wrote:
> From Loet's post:
> >During the recent conference in Vienna, I was amazed how many of our
> colleagues wish to ground information in physics.<
> I would say that I was disappointed . . .
>
> For me this exchange on
>From Loet's post:
>During the recent conference in Vienna, I was amazed how many of our
colleagues wish to ground information in physics.<
I would say that I was disappointed . . .
For me this exchange on It from Bit is problematic as its seems to simply
revisit the same problem introduced with S
I would add another possibility -- information does not appear in the universe
until it is manipulated by modern human society as a commodity.
Yes, Stan, this makes sense to me: information (in bits) can be considered as a
measurement of the expected uncertainty. It is yet meaning-free, but i
Krassimir -- Thanks. Now I see what your objection is. You do not agree
with the Wheeler concept that information was he basis upon which
everything else was founded. Rather, you see it as appearing along with
matter. Or you might consider that it appeared 'along with form', in which
case informat
