Re: [Fis] Fwd: _ Re: _ Gödel discussion

2016-05-06 Thread Francesco Rizzo
Cari Tutti, Alex, Lou, mi permetto di far notare che bisogna distinguere o non confondere: macchine, meccanismi e meccanicamente. Dire che non siamo macchine è una cosa ovvia, ma sostenere che gli uomini non devono ragionare meccanicamente non è per niente ovvio. Non Vi pare? Grazie. Francesco 20

[Fis] Clarifying Posting

2016-05-06 Thread Pedro C. Marijuan
Dear FIS Colleagues, Some parties have doubts on how to count the two messages per week --the maximum allowed in this list except for the discussion chair, which currently is Alex. Following the international business week, the count starts on Monday and obviously ends on Sunday night. Not abi

Re: [Fis] Clarifying Posting

2016-05-06 Thread Stanley N Salthe
Pedro -- In short, how might phenomenology relate to science? There is one approach - to physiology - that was taken by the British physiologist, John B. Haldane. He did ALL his experiments upon himself. STAN On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 6:12 AM, Pedro C. Marijuan wrote: > Dear FIS Colleagues, > >

Re: [Fis] Clarifying Posting

2016-05-06 Thread Robert E. Ulanowicz
> Pedro -- In short, how might phenomenology relate to science? There is > one > approach - to physiology - that was taken by the British physiologist, > John > B. Haldane. He did ALL his experiments upon himself. > > STAN Dear Pedro, Most of the discussion has centered about phenomenology in t

[Fis] Fw: Clarifying Posting. Speculative Realism

2016-05-06 Thread Joseph Brenner
Dear Friends and Colleagues, The last couple of postings have opened the discussion in a direction their authors may not have intended. Bob's felt personal plea for a phenomenological approach to biology, and hence to other sciences, and as the foundation of a philosophy, begs the question of