Re: [Fis] Brenner and Lupasco logic

2016-12-12 Thread Bruno Marchal
On 09 Dec 2016, at 15:50, tozziart...@libero.it wrote: Dear Joseph, Hi! I quote your 2010 manuscript (by the way, compliments! yours is a noteworthy paper! Furthermore, you were also able to make the unreadable Lupasco very clear!) that the FISers can find here: http://apcz.pl/czasopism

Re: [Fis] Fw: Is quantum information the basis of spacetime? Some New Theories

2016-12-12 Thread Bruno Marchal
On 14 Nov 2016, at 09:59, Joseph Brenner wrote: Dear All, It is fascinating to watch the evolution of ideas about information as a function of some new theories which beg for critique: 1. Andrei gives a correct explanation of the origin of Irreducible Quantum Randomness. In my opinion, h

[Fis] Is information a matter of... dimensions and symmetries?

2016-12-12 Thread tozziart...@libero.it
Dear FISers, In touch with Ludwig Wittgenstein's favourite example, let's play a chess game. Imagine that the chessboard is the information. We have the whites, e.g., Jaynes, Logan, Kauffmann, Marijuan (more or less!), Loet, Chu-Hsi (Zhu Xi), Susskind's account of loss of information in bl

Re: [Fis] A provocative issue

2016-12-12 Thread Rafael Capurro
Dear Pedro, your wise comments are no less inspiring for me than the last comments by Loet, namely that the concept of information is 'relative' to each context (and therefore 'objective' with regard to such context). This happens with other concepts too, of course. I said this in my PhD (197

Re: [Fis] A provocative issue

2016-12-12 Thread Pedro C. Marijuan
Dear Arturo and FISers We will forgive your life! Some other people in this list also have strong reservations to a single, canonical approach to information, either from Shannon, Boltzmann, or Fisher backgrounds. In my case, mostly biologically and socially grounded ("sociotype"), I see a co

Re: [Fis] Fwd: Who may proof that consciousness is an Euclidean n-space ??? (Jerry Chandler)

2016-12-12 Thread Karl Javorszky
Explanations Thank you, Jerry, for pointing out the excellent treatise by Hempel & Oppenheim on the Logic of Explanation. As I understand their viewpoint, the ultimate explanation refers to a system of facts that are known to all who use that system in which the explanation is placed. The explan

Re: [Fis] A provocative issue

2016-12-12 Thread Francesco Rizzo
Cari Tutti, le cose da sole o ad una ad una non hanno senso. Questo vale per tutte le cose, soprattutto per i geni, che acquisiscono senso quando interagiscono fra loro. Neanche le parole fanno eccezione in al senso perchè sono causa ed effetto di processi semiotici illimitati e consistenti in una