Re: [Fis] info meaning
Dear Bob, Pedro and colleagues: This is my first message in FIS list. My name is Walter Riofrio, Associate Professor of Peruvian University Cayetano Heredia in Lima-Peru. My research interests are: (1) Theoretical and Conceptual Analysis in Biology and Natural Sciences; (2) Nature of Biological Evolution; (3) Emergence of basic properties in Living Systems; (4) Relationships between Biological Functions, Biological Information and Network of Molecular Processes; (5) Theoretical Studies in Architecture of the Brain and its relations with the Emergence of Cognition in Evolution; (6) The Neural and Temporal Code linked to the Emergence of Mental Properties. I would like to participate in the discussion of proposals on biotic interpretation of information in POE. I agree with Pedro about the statement The origins of life must be explained by means of the highest power or upper hand in science: the experimental. But I would add the following thing: We still need the conceptual development (that it is not so easy task) and the respective translations in the design of interesting, elegant and outstanding experiments with which not only continue the accumulation of more or less dispersed data but concrete security we are obtaining explanations on this topic. Actually, I have a lot of questions because of my researches are related with some issues in the paper (although, I only put some of them here): (1) To understand adequately one of the main claims, mainly, equaling information (biotic or instructional information) with constraints I wondering if the notion propagation organization adds something more to the notion of reproduction (2) In the same way: how can arise the meaning In naturalist terms or imposed by us? If is the former, how the living beings process the meaning of some information in themselves? One can therefore argue that since the meaning of instructional information is propagating organization that we finally understand the meaning of life the meaning of life is propagating organization. (3) My last question, it is due that I have works in this issue: the nature of biological information. And my main working thesis is that I claim that it is still possible to construct in Naturalized Normative ways notions like Information, Function and Autonomy. Moreover, that these three properties are the most basic properties of life. Briefly stated, I consider the autonomy a property (global property) which is the result of the first emergence of information and function (in the local interactions between the processes in an interrelated molecular network). My working hypothesis is about the origins of prebiotic phenomena and I postulate that the system which opened these doors were the Informational Dynamic Systems (IDS). This is the one that caused the necessary and sufficient conditions to set off the succession of certain phenomena of the universe towards the possibility of the emergence of biological systems. It is also the system that might have been the driving force to the beginning of the move from the inanimate world to the animate one. My theoretical proposal visualizes the emergence of information and biological function in a sort of coordinated origin at the same time in the local processes of these types of systems. This visualization of the physical emergence of Information and Function gives us to talk about the notion of Information-Function; each time we observe functions happening in these systems processes, we can be sure that some type of information has been transmitted through them. Likewise, when we observe the transmission of some type of information among the process, we can be sure that some function has been produced among them. It means that the kind of organization in these systems (and, of course, in the living beings) is an Informational and Functional Dynamic Organization. If someone would like to read more of my proposals, there are three links: - One chapter in a book: (A) Riofrio, Walter (2007a) Informational Dynamic Systems: Autonomy, Information, Function. In Worldviews, Science, and Us: Philosophy and Complexity, edited by C. Gershenson, D. Aerts, and B. Edmonds. World Scientific, Singapore, pp. 232-249. Link of a pre-published version: http://wriofrio.aboutus.gs/Papers/PyC-WR.pdfhttp://wriofrio.aboutus.gs/Papers/PyC-WR.pdf - Two works which develops some consequences of my main claims (in the aforementioned paper) applied to the relationships between the cytoarchitectute of the brain and the emergence of cognition in evolution: (B) Riofrio, W. and Aguilar, L.A. (2006) Different Neurons Population Distribution correlates with Topologic-Temporal Dynamic Acoustic Information Flow. InterJournal Complex Systems # [1619]. http://wriofrio.aboutus.gs/Papers/AcInFl-WR.pdfhttp://wriofrio.aboutus.gs/Papers/AcInFl-WR.pdf (C
Re: [Fis] The Fascination of Art
Dear Gordana, (1) If you consider interesting philosophical studies on Complexity and Information (Biological Information) I have a manuscript entitled Informational Dynamic Systems: Autonomy, Information, Function published as a chapter in Worldviews, Science, and Us: Philosophy and Complexity, edited by C. Gershenson, D. Aerts, and B. Edmonds. World Scientific, Singapore, pp. 232-249 (2007) [it could be interesting if you take a look at inside the book], the link of a previous draft is: http://wriofrio.aboutus.gs/Papers/PyC-WR.pdf (2) One presentation in 2007: Roots and Emergence of Cognition in Evolution. Available from Nature Precedings http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/npre.2007.413.2 (3) In Biosemiotics Journal will appear Understanding the Emergence of Cellular Organization. Doi: 10.1007/s12304-008-9027-z. In my paper I seek to identify (among others) general principles that govern biological computing from the question: How do biological systems process information? http://www.springerlink.com/content/c6q176861g680w42/?p=cd657362ae4c42a0b13f11a6d8c7927fpi=5 Sincerely, Walter -- Cabecera original --- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Para: fis fis@listas.unizar.es Copia: Fecha: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 16:39:55 +0200 Asunto: Re: [Fis] The Fascination of Art Dear colleagues, I wonder if you can recommend me sources - articles, books, presentations/iPods/videos of your own or otherwise that we could have as resource in the following course: http://www.idt.mdh.se/kurser/comphil/ in Computing and Philosophy (where computing is understood as information processing)- anything in Pphilosophy of information and computing would be interesting. Best wishes, Gordana http://www.idt.mdh.se/personal/gdc/ *** Walter Riofrio Theoretical and Evolutionary Biology Researcher - Researcher, Complex Thought Institute Edgar Morin, University Ricardo Palma, Lima-Peru. - Chercheur Associé; Complex Systems Institute (ISC-PIF). E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ fis mailing list fis@listas.unizar.es https://webmail.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis
[Fis] Fwd: Closing Comments?
Dear FIS colleagues, We could talk on different aspects of the information notion. My approach is only to try to relate information with cognition. How from network of molecular dynamics, cognition and consciousness appeared in the universe? In other words, my interest is very limited and focused only in a naturalistic approach to the emergence of semantics of information (1). In this respect, I propose that “information with meaning” is the very nature of biological information (bio-meaning). I claim that signs in biological systems (and in pre-biotic systems as well) are related to matter–energy transformations as they are incorporated into the system as ‘variations’. In turn, these variations become biological information—always with bio-meaning—because they impact cohesion, maintaining, increasing or even decreasing the far from thermodynamic equilibrium state. From its initial emergence in the physical world, we can hypothesize that bio-meaning has the ability of increasing its levels of complexity and sophistication all the way up to the human world. Meaning and biological information were connected at their very beginning, and this bond conditioned the evolution of both notions well into the abstract levels of human culture. Due to this fact, it is possible the emergence of natural computations revealed in the emergence of first small world features in evolution (2). Lastly, if we agree that, in the long run of an open-ended evolution, the neurons are the cells specialized in transmitting the signals of different matter-energy variations coming from the environment by means of the digital action potentials between neurons, and if we furthermore assume that these transmissions “add” certain ways of recognizing the different matter-energy variations, then it is possible to achieve some clarifications about the emergence of mental properties (3). May it be that the constraints of the acoustic information flow due to the topological distribution of neural populations control the ways in which the information is transmitted. The specific distribution of neural cell types (in particular, inhibitory neurons) producing gradients of inhibition and/or excitatory signals are linked, we assume, to mental rules: the grammar of the mind? References (1) Riofrio, W. and Aguilar, L.A. (2010a) Different Neurons Population Distribution correlates with Topologic-Temporal Dynamic Acoustic Information Flow. In Unifying Themes in Complex Systems (New England Complex Systems Institute Book Series: Volume VI), edited by A.A. Minai, D. Braha and Y. Bar-Yam. Springer, pp. 227-234. [1] (2) Riofrio, W. (2008) Understanding the Emergence of Cellular Organization. Biosemiotics, 1(3): 361-377. (3) Riofrio, W. (2010b) On Biological Computing, Information and Molecular Networks. In Thinking Machines and the Philosophy of Computer Science: Concepts and Principles, edited by J. Vallverdú. IGI Global, pp. 53-65. Happy Holidays! Sincerely, Walter Walter Riofrio Researcher IPCEM, University Ricardo Palma. Lima-Perú Chercheur Associé; Complex Systems Institute-Paris (ISC-PIF) Theoretical and Evolutionary Biology Email: walter.riof...@iscpif.fr [2] --- - Original Message - From: Pedro C. Marijuan pcmarijuan.i...@aragon.es To: fis@listas.unizar.es Cc: Sent: mié 15/12/10 10:29 Subject: Fwd: [Fis] Closing Comments? FIS Friends, Like in most of our excursions, in the present one we have stumbled upon a very interesting and exciting attractor. Rather than throwing ourselves into a deep discussion about the modes of social knowing and their historical interrelationship my suggestion is that we sidestep them and make some concluding comments on the ongoing discussion by coming back to the final questions of Prof. Zhong (Yixin in our friendly environment!). I will pen them at the bottom. Concerning the modes of knowledge discussion, next weeks I will make a proposal in order to have it as our next discussion session (immediately after this one, or perhaps after another session which has been tentatively demanded about an axiomatic approach to information theory.) Let me make another suggestion. In the concluding comments it would be important trying to be as boldest as possible, as well as hearing new voices related to neuroscience, cellular-molecular biology, physics, and artificial intelligence. Thus I kindly demand to the active group of philosophically oriented parties, and to everybody else, to momentarily keep at bay the critical comments --only positive reactions (Christmas time!). All parties who have
Re: [Fis] The State of the Art - Discussion of Information Science Education
Dear all, It is possible find some useful ideas to build multi-inter-trans disciplinary approaches in last “closing statement” of Ubiquity Symposium: What is Computation? What Have We Said About Computation? [1] If you are interested in all papers of this ACM Ubiquity Symposium: http://ubiquity.acm.org/symposia.cfm [2] Sincerely, Walter Riofrio Walter Riofrio Researcher; Complex Thought Institute Edgar Morin – University Ricardo Palma, Lima-Peru Chercheur Associé; Institut des Systèmes Complexes – Paris Île-de-France (ISC-PIF) Theoretical and Evolutionary Biology Email: walter.riof...@iscpif.fr --- On jue 08/12/11 06:25 , John Collier colli...@ukzn.ac.za sent: Good to see that fis perspectives are used in teaching. I use information ideas fundamentally in our second year Cognitive Science course, and also in some postgrad courses I teach. John At 03:03 PM 2011/12/07, Pedro C. Marijuan wrote: Thanks a lot, Gordana. It is a very good idea. Unfortunately I could not participate in the opening of the session, well, at least I can say now that I had the experience of teaching for Engineering graduate students two neatly informational (FIS) disciplines. One of them, Bioinformation: informational analysis of living systems; and the other Science, Technology and Society: an introduction to the informational history of societies. Both of them in Spanish. They were very successful, particularly the latter. The FIS perspective is ideal not only for breaking down on impossible topics (our familiar demons) but also for promoting a new, highly original way of analysis --of knolweldge recombination processes-- on topics of our time and of the most contentious past. missing a lot the direct involvement in the discussions! yours, ---Pedro Gordana Dodig-Crnkovic escribió: Hi All, One way of looking at the question of curriculum would be from the point of view of what already exists of education in the Foundations of Information. Are there any courses which might be a part of such a curriculum? To start with I can tell about the course I have, which does not cover much of Science of information, but there are several connections. As I work at the computer science department, my perspective is computational. For me computing is information processing and information is that which is processed, and that which is a result of processing. Processing may be done by a machine or by an organism or anything else the whole of nature computes (processes information) in different ways. As info-computationalist, I believe that information is unthinkable without computation. So the course is on Computing and Philosophy but addresses Philosophy of Information and Science of Information as well and topics on evolution of life, intelligence (natural and artificial), consciousness, etc. http://www.idt.mdh.se/kurser/comphil [3] I believe it would be good to have a course on the foundations of information science for people in the computing. Information and computation are completely entangled! And this gives also an opportunity to introduce other fields into computing, to contribute to building bridges and facilitating inter-disciplinary/ cross-disciplinary/ trans-disciplinary learning. This is not as ambitious as the original question, but can help understanding where we are now and where we want to be. Best wishes, Gordana http://www.mrtc.mdh.se/~gdc/ [4] From: fis-boun...@listas.unizar.es [ mailto:fis-boun...@listas.unizar.es] On Behalf Of Stanley N Salthe Sent: den 5 december 2011 20:53 To: fis Subject: Re: [Fis] Discussion of Information Science Education And it could feature in 'Science for Non-Majors' courses as well. STAN On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Guy A Hoelzer wrote: Hi All, I agree with those who are suggesting that Information Science makes sense as a widely useful way to think about different scientific disciplines even if we don't have a strong consensus on how to define 'information'. I think there is enough coherence among views of 'information' to underpin the unity and universality of the approach. Perhaps Information Science is less a discipline of its own and more of a common approach to understanding that can be applied across disciplines. While I can imagine good courses focusing on Information Science, it might be most productive to include a common framework for information-based models/viewpoints across the curriculum. Guy Hoelzer ___ fis mailing list fis@listas.unizar.es https://webmail.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis [5] ___ fis mailing list fis@listas.unizar.es https://webmail.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis [6
[Fis] Physics of computing
Thanks John and Kevin to update issues in information, computation, energy and reality. I would like point out to other articles more focused in how coherence and entanglement are used by living systems (far from thermal equilibrium): Engel G.S., Calhoun T.R., Read E.L., Ahn T.K., Mancal T., Cheng Y.C., Blankenship R.E., Fleming G.R. (2007) Evidence for wavelike energy transfer through quantum coherence in photosynthetic systems. Nature, 446(7137): 782-786. Collini E., Scholes G. (2009) Coherent intrachain energy in migration in a conjugated polymer at room temperature. Science, vol. 323 No. 5912 pp. 369-373. Gauger E.M., Rieper E., Morton J.J.L., Benjamin S.C., Vedral V. (2011) Sustained Quantum Coherence and Entanglement in the Avian Compass. Phys. Rev. Lett., 106: 040503. Cia, J. et al, (2009) Dynamic entanglement in oscillating molecules. arXiv:0809.4906v1 [quant-ph] Sincerely, Walter___ fis mailing list fis@listas.unizar.es https://webmail.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis