.
Thank you and best wishes,
Joseph
- Original Message -
From: Koichiro Matsuno
To: fis@listas.unizar.es
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 5:55 AM
Subject: Re: [Fis] Revisiting the Fluctuon Model
Folks,
Kevin Kirby's opening remark on the Fluctuon model
Dear FISers,
Thanks to Kevin and Joseph for their excellent texts --and to the many
other responding parties. For my own argumentation purposes I find very
useful the comments from Stan, Kevin Clark, Koichiro. There are three
different aspects I would like to deal with. Given my burden of
Folks,
Kevin Kirby's opening remark on the Fluctuon model of Michael Conrad shed
light on the role of
information in physics and beyond. Here is some peripheral remark of my own,
though a bit lengthy.
1) Practicing physics may look informational in exercising its own
Dear Joe,
Please let me start by repeating my idea that fluctuons are its, that is,
energy in some form. If (mathematical) idealism is anti-realist, this is
certainly not what I would consider Conrad's theory to be. Stan comes to the
same conclusion, that fluctuons are its, but this suggests
] Revisiting the Fluctuon Model
Dear Joe,
Please let me start by repeating my idea that fluctuons are its, that is,
energy in some form. If (mathematical) idealism is anti-realist, this is
certainly not what I would consider Conrad's theory to be. Stan comes to the
same conclusion, that fluctuons
.
Best,
Gordana
Best wishes,
Gordana
From: Rafael Capurro [mailto:raf...@capurro.de]
Sent: den 25 september 2010 11:55
To: Gordana Dodig-Crnkovic
Cc: Loet Leydesdorff; 'Joseph Brenner'; 'Stanley N Salthe'; fis@listas.unizar.es
Subject: Re: [Fis] Revisiting the Fluctuon Model
dear Gordana
just
Folks --
Comments upon Kirby’s Brenner’s ‘Opening Remarks’
(1) I used Conrad’s early information-based work in developing my conception
of the scale/compositional hierarchy as applied to material systems. As a
materialist, I may have ‘mis-read’ his work. I think this now, upon
glimpsing
