Dear John and colleagues,
Thanks for the rigorous philosophical directions to connect with. Getting
ahead with the speculation business, here there are a few related "pills"
that perhaps could be matched with aspects of the current discussion:
-- physical (and biological?) information: as a d
At 08:00 AM 6/7/2006, you wrote:
Dear colleagues,
let me add another aficionado naive speculation on the matters below :
We might regard every locus of space-time as having the capacity to
instantiate the whole laws of nature, in relation to any existential
perturbation by what we call matte
Folks,
Just for the sake of balance, let me refer to one school of thought which
has been quite under-represented so far. That is the probabilistic
interpretation and formulation of QM grounded upon chance events instead of
ignorance on the part of the observer. An example is a photographic emu
Dear colleagues,
let me add another aficionado naive speculation on the matters below :
We might regard every locus of space-time as having the capacity to
instantiate the whole laws of nature, in relation to any existential
perturbation by what we call matter, energy, etc. If there is an
"in
Professor John Collier
Philosophy, University of KwaZulu-Natal
Durban 4041 South Africa
T: +27 (31) 260 3248 / 260 2292
F: +27 (31) 260 3031
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Http://ukzn.ac.za/undphil/collier
>>> Andrei Khrennikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 06/05/06 2:54 PM >>>
Dear John,
>
> On a somewhat
>One decisive difficulty with the quantum world is with its
> limited linguistic accessibility. If one dares to say
> something definite about the Q world in third person
> description in the present tense, this would come to imply
> something definite, whenever and wherever. This form of
Folks,
Pedro's question
>The "physical" existentiality of physical laws
>themselves looks intriguing ---where do they "seat"?
is neither naive nor trivial, though sounds quite disturbing to many. My
story is this.
Most people seems to accept the Greek tradition of Euclidean geometry to
so
Dear FISers,
A question I have about entanglement is what this phenomenon can tell us on
the nature of physical law. The "physical" existentiality of physical laws
themselves looks intriguing ---where do they "seat"? And what coherence and
entanglement may tell about that? Some physicists have
At 04:22 PM 5/27/2006, you wrote:
Dear Aleks,
On one hand I like very much your example and discussion, but on the
other hand I do not think that your example can be used to illustrate
the situation with Bell´s inequality.
On a somewhat different track, but relevant,
Nancy Cartwright wa
Dear Aleks,
On one hand I like very much your example and discussion, but on the
other hand I do not think that your example can be used to illustrate
the situation with Bell´s inequality.
Aleks:> Bell\'s formulation implies that the hidden variable is
independent of> the configuration of t
10 matches
Mail list logo
