I'd be interested to know whether "mattering" is considered within
"meaning". I suspect "mattering" is distinct.
thinking aloud
Science isn't just meaningful. It matters to scientists. Perhaps it's
only because it matters to some people, it exists.
Re. meaning, I think the connection bet
Caro Karl,
la chiamiamo natura, ma è tutta arte. A. Einstein e S. Hawking pensavano
che Dio non giocasse a dadi. Il primo non ha avuto il tempo di ricredersi,
il secondo si. Ha perso una scommessa, circa la non emissione di
informazione da parte dei buchi neri sostenuta nel 1975, dopo (2004-5) ha
d
not in Italian but in full concordance with what Rico ha dito:
information as a concept lies behind all and each of the ways of looking at
the world. Whatever the picture, it has a background to it.
Could it be that a description of the background is common to each and all
of the pictures one makes
Cari Tutti,
il concetto o significato di informazione è unico, quel che varia è il modo
di qualificarlo o quantificarlo in ragione dei diversi tipi o categorie di
informazione: naturale o termodinamica, genetica, semantica e matematica. E
questo lo dico da studioso di economia della scienza o dell'
Dear Pedro,
I disagree about putting "meaning" outside the scope of natural sciences.
I doubt that anybody on this list would disagree about using the metaphor of
meaning in the natural sciences.
Maturana (1978, p. 49): "In still other words, if an organism is observed in
its operati
rk. And the question is still
being asked.
Best
Christophe
*De :* Søren Brier
*Envoyé :* mercredi 6 avril 2016 02:04
*À :* 'Christophe'
*Cc :* fis@listas.unizar.es
*Objet :* SV: [Fis] _ DISCUSSION SESSION: INFOBIOSEMIOTICS
Dear Christophe
Nev
Dear Soren,
It is very strange for me to read yours as usual very learned text,
because your understanding of what it is I am trying to do is so different
from my own understanding. Though I have had great pleasure of reading you
works over the years I am not sure that you have read much of
Dear Soren,
In my opinion, there are two issues here (again J ):
1. the issue of non-verbal (e.g., bodily) communication;
2. the meta-biological or transdisciplinary integration vs. the
differentiation among the disciplines.
Ad 1. Although I don't agree with Luhmann on many things, h
arijuan'"
mailto:pcmarijuan.i...@aragon.es>>,
"fis@listas.unizar.es<mailto:fis@listas.unizar.es>"
mailto:fis@listas.unizar.es>>
Subject: Re: [Fis] _ DISCUSSION SESSION: INFOBIOSEMIOTICS
Thus the question is how can we establish an alternative transdisciplin
?user=ych9gNYJ&hl=en
From: Fis [mailto:fis-boun...@listas.unizar.es] On Behalf Of Pedro C.
Marijuan
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2016 2:01 PM
To: fis@listas.unizar.es
Subject: [Fis] _ DISCUSSION SESSION: INFOBIOSEMIOTICS
Dear FIS Colleagues,
I am attaching herein Soeren's presenta
Dear FIS Colleagues,
I am attaching herein Soeren's presentation. If you have any trouble
with the attachment, the file is in fis web pages too:
http://fis.sciforum.net/fis-discussion-sessions/
By clicking on Soeren Brier's session (highlighted in red) you can
immediately obtain it.
Nevert
11 matches
Mail list logo
