Pedro --
OK Stan, but can you apply those "propositional" (human) modifications also to
bacteria, fish, (human) enterprise or institution, society
otherwise I am affraid you move only in the anthropocentric realm.
best ---Pedro
We can certainly note that 'knowing that' is a linguistic e
Philosophical discussion of 'knowledge' is long and deep, of course; one
can check with the online Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy for a
review of the literature. Fred Dretske brought the discussion into the
realm of semantic information theory. The classic text is: Dretske,
Fred. 1981, Kno
All knowing that is a form of knowing how, so knowing how is more basic.
At 09:08 PM 2009/10/02, ssal...@binghamton.edu wrote:
>Pedro --
>
>OK Stan, but can you apply those "propositional" (human) modifications also to
>bacteria, fish, (human) enterprise or institution, society
>
>otherwise I am a
I accidentally sent this only to Pedro last time.
Pedro, everyone,
There are two basic approaches to representational knowledge (knowing
that) in philosophy. The traditional one is that knowledge is justified
true belief. This goes back to Plato. It is an internalist account of the
sort suggested
