Cari Tutti,
sarebbe oltremodo interessante ed utile discutere sulla triade sintassi,
semantica e pragmatica rievocata intelligentemente da Terry, piuttosto che
continuare ad insistere esclusivamente sulla teoria dell'informazione
matematica. Questo non è un intervento, ma una proposta.
Grazie.
Fran
The language metaphor is so very seductive. I fear that our discussion is
too easily ensnared by its ubiquity in our lives. From Günther's response I
am also not clear whether he is defending using the language model as
generic or as a special case (though we do not agree in our assessments of
von
Dear FISers and all,
I include below another response to Immanuel post (from Guenther). I
think he has penned an excellent response--my only addition is to
expostulate a doubt. Should our analysis of the human (or cellular!)
communication with the environment be related to linguistic practices
Dear Emanuel,
Unfortunately, you have stated no axioms and introduced subjectivity.
Recall that I began with a definition of “semantic” per Carnap. Semantics are
simply the rules of syntax transformation. Semantics have little to do with
natural human language. Indeed, Carnap was very conscious
Dear FIS colleagues,
As a newcomer to FIS, I feel myself very uncomfortable when I have to
interrupt the ongoing discourse with something that looks for me quite
natural but is lacking in our current public dialog. What I have in mind is
that in every discussion or argument exchange, first of a
