On 3/8/07, Philip Ganchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/7/07, Axel Liljencrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't been very active in this discussion because of various real
life issues, including the fact that I will present my licenthiate
thesis tomorrow, but I am reading all entries
On 3/8/07, Martin Baehr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 03:02:25PM -0500, Philip Ganchev wrote:
It is an interesting idea to be able to say that you don't want the
case to be changed. But using wildcards is not a good way to do this,
because they make the expression more
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 03:02:25PM -0500, Philip Ganchev wrote:
It is an interesting idea to be able to say that you don't want the
case to be changed. But using wildcards is not a good way to do this,
because they make the expression more general, not more specific. One
way to do it is to
On 3/8/07, Martin Baehr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
that's a good point. if one puts uppercase letters in there it's
presumably done intentionally and getting the case changed on that would
be irritating.
Perhaps... but how often would it happen? Don't forget the scenario of why
you are using
Hmm. I should cut back on the ranting.
A point I forgot though... I have no problem with only doing the case
insensitive matching if there are no globs/regex. It really does complicate
matters. If the code turns out to be easy however, then working with
globs/regex would be a bonus.
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 05:41:13PM -0600, Myrddin Emrys wrote:
linux mv *.DOtab
*.do stupid.doc, silly.doc, resume.doc, ...
linux mv *.do
Just because I use capital letters doesn't mean I am certain of the case I
want...
I don't know about you, but I don't press tab if I'm not expecting
On Mar 5, 2007, at 11:09 AM, Martin Baehr wrote:
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 11:59:08AM -0600, Myrddin Emrys wrote:
linux rm ab*tab
Ab* Absolute.txt, Abstract.txt, Abrasive.txt...
linux rm Ab*
this is exactly what i am afraid of, because if i do not notice
that the
case chsnged and my
On 3/5/07, Myrddin Emrys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I dunno. The fact that it displayed the text, and re-displayed the command
line, is a pretty blunt stick indicating that there was no match. In
particular, you'll see the list of matching files for the new match
listed... if that doesn't send
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 01:55:24PM -0600, Myrddin Emrys wrote:
I dunno. The fact that it displayed the text, and re-displayed the command
line, is a pretty blunt stick indicating that there was no match. In
particular, you'll see the list of matching files for the new match
listed... if that
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 01:04:54AM +0200, Beni Cherniavsky wrote:
In cases when there is no single completion that will cover all cases,
I as a user would expect the competing options (e.g. '*AB*cd' and
'*ab*cd') to be presented as alternative completions.
even if there is only a single
10 matches
Mail list logo
