Yes, it seems type is what I am looking for.
Although it still might be nice if it described abbreviations as well...
Many thanks, guys.
-Mike
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Greg Reagle wrote:
> On 11/18/2015 02:50 PM, Mike Costanzo wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am suggesting that fish be gi
On 11/18/2015 02:50 PM, Mike Costanzo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am suggesting that fish be given a builtin implementation of the 'which'
> command.
> Currently it seems that it will just fall to the 'which' that is in the path
> (if any).
>
> In csh / tcsh 'which' is a builtin that will tell you if
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 1:51 PM Mike Costanzo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am suggesting that fish be given a builtin implementation of the 'which'
> command.
> Currently it seems that it will just fall to the 'which' that is in the
> path (if any).
>
> In csh / tcsh 'which' is a builtin that will tell
Hello,
I am suggesting that fish be given a builtin implementation of the 'which'
command.
Currently it seems that it will just fall to the 'which' that is in the
path (if any).
In csh / tcsh 'which' is a builtin that will tell you if a command is an
alias or tell you the path for the program (if
