Re: [Fish-users] fish file locations

2006-10-06 Thread Axel Liljencrantz
On 10/6/06, Martin Bähr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 03:03:25AM +0200, Axel Liljencrantz wrote: The nice and friendly warning will tell them what happened, true. need to be sure they see the warning though. Yes. And a small percentage will still miss it. So it should be

Re: [Fish-users] fish file locations

2006-10-05 Thread Axel Liljencrantz
On 10/4/06, Martin Bähr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 01:47:41AM +0200, Axel Liljencrantz wrote: But I strongly dislike moving the users files. It's bad for your health. which is why it may be better now than later. it will only get worse. Agreed. If this change is to

Re: [Fish-users] fish file locations

2006-10-05 Thread Axel Liljencrantz
On 10/6/06, Martin Bähr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 11:06:21PM +0200, Axel Liljencrantz wrote: I don't like the idea of having two standard user configuration files at all, I'm afraid. I'd rather have only ~/.config/fish/fish than both. fair point. i agree. Sorry,

Re: [Fish-users] fish file locations

2006-10-04 Thread Myrddin Emrys
in other words: do not create multiple files in the users homedirectory,but please move all of them into one directory called .fish (and not .fish.d as the .d is redundant)Ditto. I fiddle with config files enough that I put use the '-a' flag on my listings pretty constantly... so .fish added a

Re: [Fish-users] fish file locations

2006-10-04 Thread Axel Liljencrantz
On 10/4/06, James Vega [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 11:25:06PM +0200, Axel Liljencrantz wrote: --- Martin Bähr [EMAIL PROTECTED] skrev: http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#FTN.AEN540 It is recommended that files be stored in subdirectories of /etc rather

Re: [Fish-users] fish file locations

2006-10-03 Thread Axel Liljencrantz
--- Martin Bähr [EMAIL PROTECTED] skrev: On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 01:41:44AM +0200, Axel Liljencrantz wrote: i have a discussion item that will force a filename change in anycase, Ok. Is it something like timestamping commands, or giving each command a unique id? no, it is nothing

Re: [Fish-users] fish file locations

2006-10-03 Thread Martin Bähr
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 11:25:06PM +0200, Axel Liljencrantz wrote: One note here: The way I read the part of the standard you quote, it does not make any mention either of the use of either the '.d' or the 'rc' suffix right, that was my personal opinion in tht matter. _My_ interpretation is

Re: [Fish-users] fish file locations

2006-10-03 Thread James Vega
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 11:25:06PM +0200, Axel Liljencrantz wrote: --- Martin Bähr [EMAIL PROTECTED] skrev: http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#FTN.AEN540 It is recommended that files be stored in subdirectories of /etc rather than directly in /etc. fish is again doing

Re: [Fish-users] fish file locations

2006-10-03 Thread Martin Baehr
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 06:58:26PM -0400, James Vega wrote: If you were to go any route that involved a . directory in ~ which wasn't .fish*, I'd suggest following the freedesktop.org/XDG standards. They're pushing for a .config directory which applications could put their user specific config

Re: [Fish-users] fish file locations

2006-10-03 Thread Axel Liljencrantz
--- Martin Bähr [EMAIL PROTECTED] skrev: On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 11:25:06PM +0200, Axel Liljencrantz wrote: One note here: The way I read the part of the standard you quote, it does not make any mention either of the use of either the '.d' or the 'rc' suffix right, that was my

[Fish-users] fish file locations

2006-10-01 Thread Martin Bähr
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 01:41:44AM +0200, Axel Liljencrantz wrote: i have a discussion item that will force a filename change in anycase, Ok. Is it something like timestamping commands, or giving each command a unique id? no, it is nothing about the format ir information stored, but simply