On 11/05/2014 01:53 PM, Siteshwar wrote:
> If you fork a new fish process it will have different environment
> then it's parent process for e.g. local and global variables which
> are not exported are not available to new fish process. So this
> approach may or may not work depending on user requir
Hi!
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 12:13:56AM +0530, Siteshwar wrote:
> Yes. We have implemented a new parser after fish 2.1 and this statement
> does not give a syntax error with it.
Cool! Thanks! Glad to see that.
Tobi
--
__
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 12:18 AM, Greg Reagle wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014, at 02:13 PM, Siteshwar wrote:
> > It is a known issue
> > https://github.com/fish-shell/fish-shell/issues/563
>
> Thanks for that.
>
> The syntax error that I reported is a known issue at
> https://github.com/fish-shell/
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 12:01 AM, Tobias Mueller
wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 12:32:24PM -0400, Glenn Jackman wrote:
> > begin; sleep 10; and beep; end &
> >
> > should do it.
> I agree.
> It does not work, however, for me.
>
> begin; sleep 10; and beep; end &
>
> fish: Could not locat
Hi.
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 12:41:06PM -0400, Greg Reagle wrote:
> I found a way to make it work calling fish explicitly:
> fish -c 'sleep 10; and beep' &
:-\ That's semi-optimal, I think.
May I conclude that the desired functionality is currently not offered
by fish? Is this intentional or
Hi.
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 12:32:24PM -0400, Glenn Jackman wrote:
> begin; sleep 10; and beep; end &
>
> should do it.
I agree.
It does not work, however, for me.
begin; sleep 10; and beep; end &
fish: Could not locate end of block. The “end” c
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014, at 02:13 PM, Siteshwar wrote:
> It is a known issue
> https://github.com/fish-shell/fish-shell/issues/563
Thanks for that.
The syntax error that I reported is a known issue at
https://github.com/fish-shell/fish-shell/issues/761. Looks like it was
fixed 23 days ago.
As far
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Cedric Auger wrote:
> begin; sleep 10; and echo "beep"; end
>
> works in my version, but appending '&' does not change the behaviour.
>
> I thought, that this was due to the fact that "begin;" was parsed before
> "&", so I tried to "cheat" by using "eval":
>
> ev
begin; sleep 10; and echo "beep"; end
works in my version, but appending '&' does not change the behaviour.
I thought, that this was due to the fact that "begin;" was parsed before
"&", so I tried to "cheat" by using "eval":
eval "sleep 10; and echo \"beep\"" &
but, although "sleep 10; and echo
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014, at 12:32 PM, Glenn Jackman wrote:
> begin; sleep 10; and beep; end &
>
> should do it.
I get a syntax error with fish 2.1.1:
fish: Could not locate end of block. The “end” command is missing,
misspelled or a “;”
is missing.
--
http://www.fastmail.fm - Or how I learned to
That's a great question. Thanks for asking it. I have fish 2.1.1. I
thought that using a begin/end block would be the way to do this, but
that is a synatx error. Then I
put the code into a function, and that didn't work either--not a syntax
error, but it waited for the sleep to finish before sho
begin; sleep 10; and beep; end &
should do it.
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Tobias Mueller
wrote:
> Hi everyone.
>
> I am intending to do something like this:
>
> sleep 10; and beep &
>
> i.e. put a rather long running series of commands in the background.
>
> With my fish 2.0.0,
12 matches
Mail list logo
