[Flac-dev] Testing 24-bit full-scale deflection streams fails

2007-09-14 Thread Daniel Aleksandersen
Hi list,

I am trying to compile and install flac 1.2. I $ ./configure(d) and $ 
make(d) without any errors or warnings. However I get the following error 
when $ make check(ing):

 Testing 24-bit full-scale deflection streams...
 fsd24-01 (--channels=1 --bps=24 -0 -l 16 --lax -m -e -p): encode...ERROR
 during encode of fsd24-01 
 FAIL: ./test_streams.sh
 ===
 2 of 7 tests failed
 ===

Using KUbuntu 7.04 x86_64 using following command:
$ ./configure  make  make check  sudo make install
(Which by the way works perfectly on flac 1.1.4.)

Let me know what other data is required to find out why it failed. And 
please do explain how I get that data/output/logs/whatever.
-- 
Daniel Aleksandersen
___
Flac-dev mailing list
Flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev


Re: [Flac-dev] Support .cda as input files

2007-09-14 Thread Ralph Giles
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 05:35:04PM -0400, Dan Pritts wrote:

 the format for CD-ROM sets aside space for error correction and
 therefore has less available for data.

Red Book CD Audio still has error correction. Otherwise you'd *really* 
notice the scratches.

On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 01:10:09AM +0200, Harry Sack wrote:
 does anybody know why dvd use files for audio and video but audio cd's not?
 What could be the reason for this?

Otherwise, yes, as Dan said, The technology is almost 30 years old, and 
it's designed much more like a digital phonograph than a computer 
storage disk. CD-DA isn't even block addressable in the normal sense. 
The data is written in a continuous spiral from start to finish, with
local signposts to help seeking.

At the time, I expect there was no expectation of using it for data 
storage, and no need for the overhead of a conventional filesystem.

Even DVD-Video only provides the filesystem structure as a convenience. 
IIRC it's possible to play a dvd by accessing the ifo files at a fixed 
offset and using the embedded sector references.

 -r
___
Flac-dev mailing list
Flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev


Re: [Flac-dev] upcoming release, need help

2007-09-14 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
Josh Coalson wrote:

 checked in to CVS is what will be very close to the 1.2.1 release
 of flac scheduled for monday.  if anyone can try building it and
 even better running the test suite, and reporting back any problems,
 that will help me get things in better shape.

I'm currently running the tests on :

Linux x86-64
Mac OSX PowerPC

Do you plan to revert the changes you made to the function prototypes:

FLAC__metadata_object_picture_set_mime_type
FLAC__metadata_object_picture_set_description

in include/FLAC/metadata.h? Like I stated in a previous email:

http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2007-September/002351.html

If you allow this changes to stay, it will mean that client code
that compiled with no warnings with FLAC 1.2.0 will produce 
warnings with 1.2.1.


Erik
-- 
-
Erik de Castro Lopo
-
Good advice for everyone : stay away from churches, mosques and
synagogues.
___
Flac-dev mailing list
Flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev


Re: [Flac-dev] upcoming release, need help

2007-09-14 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
Avuton Olrich wrote:

 I'd love to, I've got CVS checked out, how do I run this test suite?

   ./configure
   make
   make check

Erik
-- 
-
Erik de Castro Lopo
-
Properly read, the Bible is the most potent force for atheism 
ever conceived -- Isaac Asimov
___
Flac-dev mailing list
Flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev


Re: [Flac-dev] upcoming release, need help

2007-09-14 Thread Josh Coalson
I've decided to put that one off till after the release.  btw
the cvs logs show that change happened between 1.1.2 and 1.1.3,
or do you mean the warnings will come from the extra -W options
you proposed?

--- Erik de Castro Lopo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Josh Coalson wrote:
 
  checked in to CVS is what will be very close to the 1.2.1 release
  of flac scheduled for monday.  if anyone can try building it and
  even better running the test suite, and reporting back any
 problems,
  that will help me get things in better shape.
 
 I'm currently running the tests on :
 
 Linux x86-64
 Mac OSX PowerPC
 
 Do you plan to revert the changes you made to the function
 prototypes:
 
 FLAC__metadata_object_picture_set_mime_type
 FLAC__metadata_object_picture_set_description
 
 in include/FLAC/metadata.h? Like I stated in a previous email:
 
 http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2007-September/002351.html
 
 If you allow this changes to stay, it will mean that client code
 that compiled with no warnings with FLAC 1.2.0 will produce 
 warnings with 1.2.1.
 
 
 Erik


  

Tonight's top picks. What will you watch tonight? Preview the hottest shows on 
Yahoo! TV.
http://tv.yahoo.com/ 

___
Flac-dev mailing list
Flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev


Re: [Flac-dev] upcoming release, need help

2007-09-14 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
Josh Coalson wrote:

 I've decided to put that one off till after the release.  btw
 the cvs logs show that change happened between 1.1.2 and 1.1.3,

Sorry, I think I'm getting confused between what is in your official
tree and some exploratory hacking I was doing where I was trying to 
fix some of these const-correct issues.

The functions I'm talking about were new additions in 2006:


http://flac.cvs.sourceforge.net/flac/flac/include/FLAC/metadata.h?r1=1.53r2=1.54

and not more recently.

Cheers,
Erik
-- 
-
Erik de Castro Lopo
-
I hack, therefore I am.
___
Flac-dev mailing list
Flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev


Re: [Flac-dev] Testing 24-bit full-scale deflection streams fails

2007-09-14 Thread Daniel Aleksandersen
On 2007-09-15, Josh wrote:
 --- Daniel Aleksandersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Hi list,
 
  I am trying to compile and install flac 1.2. I $ ./configure(d) and $
 
  make(d) without any errors or warnings. However I get the following
  error
 
  when $ make check(ing):
   Testing 24-bit full-scale deflection streams...
   fsd24-01 (--channels=1 --bps=24 -0 -l 16 --lax -m -e -p):
 
  encode...ERROR
 
   during encode of fsd24-01
   FAIL: ./test_streams.sh
   ===
   2 of 7 tests failed
   ===
 
  Using KUbuntu 7.04 x86_64 using following command:
  $ ./configure  make  make check  sudo make install
  (Which by the way works perfectly on flac 1.1.4.)
 
  Let me know what other data is required to find out why it failed.
  And  please do explain how I get that data/output/logs/whatever.

 test_streams.sh makes a huge file called streams.log with a record
 of everything.  if you can snip the last 100 lines or so of it
 (enough to capture the entire encode/decode/verify cycle of the
 last test) I might be able to tell what happened.

There were only 130 lines or so. I attached the entire file.

 also can you verify that the md5sum of fsd24-01.raw is
 5a97c581700d975fcff78e8be0f19d7e

Checksums matches.
-- 
Daniel Aleksandersen
### ENCODE noise ###
###cmd=run_flac --verify --silent --force --force-raw-format --endian=little --sign=signed --sample-rate=44100 --bps=8 --channels=1 -0 --no-padding --stdout -
### DECODE noise ###
###cmd=run_flac --silent --force --endian=little --sign=signed --decode --force-raw-format --stdout -

-: WARNING, cannot check MD5 signature since it was unset in the STREAMINFO
-rw-r--r-- 1 aleksandersen aleksandersen 1572864 2007-09-15 01:04 noise.raw
-rw-r--r-- 1 aleksandersen aleksandersen 1586484 2007-09-15 01:16 noise.flac
-rw-r--r-- 1 aleksandersen aleksandersen 1572864 2007-09-15 01:16 noise.cmp
### ENCODE test01 ###
###cmd=run_flac --verify --silent --force --force-raw-format --endian=little --sign=signed --sample-rate=44100 --bps=16 --channels=1 -0 -l 16 --lax -m -e -p --no-padding test01.raw
### DECODE test01 ###
###cmd=run_flac --silent --force --endian=little --sign=signed --decode --force-raw-format --output-name=test01.cmp test01.flac
-rw-r--r-- 1 aleksandersen aleksandersen 2 2007-09-15 01:04 test01.raw
-rw-r--r-- 1 aleksandersen aleksandersen 120 2007-09-15 01:04 test01.flac
-rw-r--r-- 1 aleksandersen aleksandersen 2 2007-09-15 01:04 test01.cmp
### ENCODE test02 ###
###cmd=run_flac --verify --silent --force --force-raw-format --endian=little --sign=signed --sample-rate=44100 --bps=16 --channels=2 -0 -l 16 --lax -m -e -p --no-padding test02.raw
### DECODE test02 ###
###cmd=run_flac --silent --force --endian=little --sign=signed --decode --force-raw-format --output-name=test02.cmp test02.flac
-rw-r--r-- 1 aleksandersen aleksandersen 4 2007-09-15 01:04 test02.raw
-rw-r--r-- 1 aleksandersen aleksandersen 123 2007-09-15 01:04 test02.flac
-rw-r--r-- 1 aleksandersen aleksandersen 4 2007-09-15 01:04 test02.cmp
### ENCODE test03 ###
###cmd=run_flac --verify --silent --force --force-raw-format --endian=little --sign=signed --sample-rate=44100 --bps=16 --channels=1 -0 -l 16 --lax -m -e -p --no-padding test03.raw
### DECODE test03 ###
###cmd=run_flac --silent --force --endian=little --sign=signed --decode --force-raw-format --output-name=test03.cmp test03.flac
-rw-r--r-- 1 aleksandersen aleksandersen 10 2007-09-15 01:04 test03.raw
-rw-r--r-- 1 aleksandersen aleksandersen 125 2007-09-15 01:04 test03.flac
-rw-r--r-- 1 aleksandersen aleksandersen 10 2007-09-15 01:04 test03.cmp
### ENCODE test04 ###
###cmd=run_flac --verify --silent --force --force-raw-format --endian=little --sign=signed --sample-rate=44100 --bps=16 --channels=2 -0 -l 16 --lax -m -e -p --no-padding test04.raw
### DECODE test04 ###
###cmd=run_flac --silent --force --endian=little --sign=signed --decode --force-raw-format --output-name=test04.cmp test04.flac
-rw-r--r-- 1 aleksandersen aleksandersen 20 2007-09-15 01:04 test04.raw
-rw-r--r-- 1 aleksandersen aleksandersen 132 2007-09-15 01:04 test04.flac
-rw-r--r-- 1 aleksandersen aleksandersen 20 2007-09-15 01:04 test04.cmp
### ENCODE fsd8-01 ###
###cmd=run_flac --verify --silent --force --force-raw-format --endian=little --sign=signed --sample-rate=44100 --bps=8 --channels=1 -0 -l 16 --lax -m -e -p --no-padding fsd8-01.raw
### DECODE 

Re: [Flac-dev] Testing 24-bit full-scale deflection streams fails

2007-09-14 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
Josh Coalson wrote:

  Using KUbuntu 7.04 x86_64 using following command:

I'm using standard Ubuntu on x86-64 (AMD) and the same test
passes on my machine.

 test_streams.sh makes a huge file called streams.log with a record

In fact, I just re-ran that test again and it passed again.

Erik
-- 
-
Erik de Castro Lopo
-
Learning OCaml is like a wormhole: a little dark, but there is 
a new, bigger universe much closer than you realise.
-- Chris Alfred
___
Flac-dev mailing list
Flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev


Re: [Flac-dev] upcoming release, need help

2007-09-14 Thread Avuton Olrich
On 9/14/07, Josh Coalson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 checked in to CVS is what will be very close to the 1.2.1 release
 of flac scheduled for monday.  if anyone can try building it and
 even better running the test suite, and reporting back any problems,
 that will help me get things in better shape.

Checked 2 x86_64 boxes they worked fine, 1 x86 failed a test. Logs
(streams, picture, cuesheet) for the failed box attached, please let
me know if I can help in any way.
-- 
avuton
--
 Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.


logs.tar.bz2
Description: BZip2 compressed data
___
Flac-dev mailing list
Flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev


Re: [Flac-dev] upcoming release, need help

2007-09-14 Thread Ralph Giles
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 06:12:22PM -0700, Ralph Giles wrote:

 Do you know what features prompted the 1.7 automake version requirement? 
 It seems to work fine with the 1.6.3 distributed by Apple.

This was of course my suggestion originally. :P

http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2006-November/002019.html

I don't remember now if I just asked for 1.7 because that's what I had 
around to test or not. If you're brave, reduce it to 1.6 and see if 
anyone has problems. Should make the dist version compile out of the box 
(modulo asm) on MacOS X.

 -r

___
Flac-dev mailing list
Flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev


Re: [Flac-dev] upcoming release, need help

2007-09-14 Thread Avuton Olrich
On 9/14/07, Josh Coalson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 the those logs look fine, maybe some other test failed like the
 unit tests which are unfortunately not logged.  could you try
 running them individually and see if there's a problem (they're
 relatively quick)

 $ cd test
 $ ./test_libFLAC.sh release 
   ./test_libFLAC++.sh release 
   ./test_flac.sh release 
   ./test_metaflac.sh release 
   ./test_seeking.sh release

 that will stop on the first error

Stopped at the attached, but I don't see the error
-- 
avuton
--
 Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.


test_libFLAC++.log.bz2
Description: BZip2 compressed data
___
Flac-dev mailing list
Flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev