[Flac-dev] Testing 24-bit full-scale deflection streams fails
Hi list, I am trying to compile and install flac 1.2. I $ ./configure(d) and $ make(d) without any errors or warnings. However I get the following error when $ make check(ing): Testing 24-bit full-scale deflection streams... fsd24-01 (--channels=1 --bps=24 -0 -l 16 --lax -m -e -p): encode...ERROR during encode of fsd24-01 FAIL: ./test_streams.sh === 2 of 7 tests failed === Using KUbuntu 7.04 x86_64 using following command: $ ./configure make make check sudo make install (Which by the way works perfectly on flac 1.1.4.) Let me know what other data is required to find out why it failed. And please do explain how I get that data/output/logs/whatever. -- Daniel Aleksandersen ___ Flac-dev mailing list Flac-dev@xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
Re: [Flac-dev] Support .cda as input files
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 05:35:04PM -0400, Dan Pritts wrote: the format for CD-ROM sets aside space for error correction and therefore has less available for data. Red Book CD Audio still has error correction. Otherwise you'd *really* notice the scratches. On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 01:10:09AM +0200, Harry Sack wrote: does anybody know why dvd use files for audio and video but audio cd's not? What could be the reason for this? Otherwise, yes, as Dan said, The technology is almost 30 years old, and it's designed much more like a digital phonograph than a computer storage disk. CD-DA isn't even block addressable in the normal sense. The data is written in a continuous spiral from start to finish, with local signposts to help seeking. At the time, I expect there was no expectation of using it for data storage, and no need for the overhead of a conventional filesystem. Even DVD-Video only provides the filesystem structure as a convenience. IIRC it's possible to play a dvd by accessing the ifo files at a fixed offset and using the embedded sector references. -r ___ Flac-dev mailing list Flac-dev@xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
Re: [Flac-dev] upcoming release, need help
Josh Coalson wrote: checked in to CVS is what will be very close to the 1.2.1 release of flac scheduled for monday. if anyone can try building it and even better running the test suite, and reporting back any problems, that will help me get things in better shape. I'm currently running the tests on : Linux x86-64 Mac OSX PowerPC Do you plan to revert the changes you made to the function prototypes: FLAC__metadata_object_picture_set_mime_type FLAC__metadata_object_picture_set_description in include/FLAC/metadata.h? Like I stated in a previous email: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2007-September/002351.html If you allow this changes to stay, it will mean that client code that compiled with no warnings with FLAC 1.2.0 will produce warnings with 1.2.1. Erik -- - Erik de Castro Lopo - Good advice for everyone : stay away from churches, mosques and synagogues. ___ Flac-dev mailing list Flac-dev@xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
Re: [Flac-dev] upcoming release, need help
Avuton Olrich wrote: I'd love to, I've got CVS checked out, how do I run this test suite? ./configure make make check Erik -- - Erik de Castro Lopo - Properly read, the Bible is the most potent force for atheism ever conceived -- Isaac Asimov ___ Flac-dev mailing list Flac-dev@xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
Re: [Flac-dev] upcoming release, need help
I've decided to put that one off till after the release. btw the cvs logs show that change happened between 1.1.2 and 1.1.3, or do you mean the warnings will come from the extra -W options you proposed? --- Erik de Castro Lopo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Josh Coalson wrote: checked in to CVS is what will be very close to the 1.2.1 release of flac scheduled for monday. if anyone can try building it and even better running the test suite, and reporting back any problems, that will help me get things in better shape. I'm currently running the tests on : Linux x86-64 Mac OSX PowerPC Do you plan to revert the changes you made to the function prototypes: FLAC__metadata_object_picture_set_mime_type FLAC__metadata_object_picture_set_description in include/FLAC/metadata.h? Like I stated in a previous email: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2007-September/002351.html If you allow this changes to stay, it will mean that client code that compiled with no warnings with FLAC 1.2.0 will produce warnings with 1.2.1. Erik Tonight's top picks. What will you watch tonight? Preview the hottest shows on Yahoo! TV. http://tv.yahoo.com/ ___ Flac-dev mailing list Flac-dev@xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
Re: [Flac-dev] upcoming release, need help
Josh Coalson wrote: I've decided to put that one off till after the release. btw the cvs logs show that change happened between 1.1.2 and 1.1.3, Sorry, I think I'm getting confused between what is in your official tree and some exploratory hacking I was doing where I was trying to fix some of these const-correct issues. The functions I'm talking about were new additions in 2006: http://flac.cvs.sourceforge.net/flac/flac/include/FLAC/metadata.h?r1=1.53r2=1.54 and not more recently. Cheers, Erik -- - Erik de Castro Lopo - I hack, therefore I am. ___ Flac-dev mailing list Flac-dev@xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
Re: [Flac-dev] Testing 24-bit full-scale deflection streams fails
On 2007-09-15, Josh wrote: --- Daniel Aleksandersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi list, I am trying to compile and install flac 1.2. I $ ./configure(d) and $ make(d) without any errors or warnings. However I get the following error when $ make check(ing): Testing 24-bit full-scale deflection streams... fsd24-01 (--channels=1 --bps=24 -0 -l 16 --lax -m -e -p): encode...ERROR during encode of fsd24-01 FAIL: ./test_streams.sh === 2 of 7 tests failed === Using KUbuntu 7.04 x86_64 using following command: $ ./configure make make check sudo make install (Which by the way works perfectly on flac 1.1.4.) Let me know what other data is required to find out why it failed. And please do explain how I get that data/output/logs/whatever. test_streams.sh makes a huge file called streams.log with a record of everything. if you can snip the last 100 lines or so of it (enough to capture the entire encode/decode/verify cycle of the last test) I might be able to tell what happened. There were only 130 lines or so. I attached the entire file. also can you verify that the md5sum of fsd24-01.raw is 5a97c581700d975fcff78e8be0f19d7e Checksums matches. -- Daniel Aleksandersen ### ENCODE noise ### ###cmd=run_flac --verify --silent --force --force-raw-format --endian=little --sign=signed --sample-rate=44100 --bps=8 --channels=1 -0 --no-padding --stdout - ### DECODE noise ### ###cmd=run_flac --silent --force --endian=little --sign=signed --decode --force-raw-format --stdout - -: WARNING, cannot check MD5 signature since it was unset in the STREAMINFO -rw-r--r-- 1 aleksandersen aleksandersen 1572864 2007-09-15 01:04 noise.raw -rw-r--r-- 1 aleksandersen aleksandersen 1586484 2007-09-15 01:16 noise.flac -rw-r--r-- 1 aleksandersen aleksandersen 1572864 2007-09-15 01:16 noise.cmp ### ENCODE test01 ### ###cmd=run_flac --verify --silent --force --force-raw-format --endian=little --sign=signed --sample-rate=44100 --bps=16 --channels=1 -0 -l 16 --lax -m -e -p --no-padding test01.raw ### DECODE test01 ### ###cmd=run_flac --silent --force --endian=little --sign=signed --decode --force-raw-format --output-name=test01.cmp test01.flac -rw-r--r-- 1 aleksandersen aleksandersen 2 2007-09-15 01:04 test01.raw -rw-r--r-- 1 aleksandersen aleksandersen 120 2007-09-15 01:04 test01.flac -rw-r--r-- 1 aleksandersen aleksandersen 2 2007-09-15 01:04 test01.cmp ### ENCODE test02 ### ###cmd=run_flac --verify --silent --force --force-raw-format --endian=little --sign=signed --sample-rate=44100 --bps=16 --channels=2 -0 -l 16 --lax -m -e -p --no-padding test02.raw ### DECODE test02 ### ###cmd=run_flac --silent --force --endian=little --sign=signed --decode --force-raw-format --output-name=test02.cmp test02.flac -rw-r--r-- 1 aleksandersen aleksandersen 4 2007-09-15 01:04 test02.raw -rw-r--r-- 1 aleksandersen aleksandersen 123 2007-09-15 01:04 test02.flac -rw-r--r-- 1 aleksandersen aleksandersen 4 2007-09-15 01:04 test02.cmp ### ENCODE test03 ### ###cmd=run_flac --verify --silent --force --force-raw-format --endian=little --sign=signed --sample-rate=44100 --bps=16 --channels=1 -0 -l 16 --lax -m -e -p --no-padding test03.raw ### DECODE test03 ### ###cmd=run_flac --silent --force --endian=little --sign=signed --decode --force-raw-format --output-name=test03.cmp test03.flac -rw-r--r-- 1 aleksandersen aleksandersen 10 2007-09-15 01:04 test03.raw -rw-r--r-- 1 aleksandersen aleksandersen 125 2007-09-15 01:04 test03.flac -rw-r--r-- 1 aleksandersen aleksandersen 10 2007-09-15 01:04 test03.cmp ### ENCODE test04 ### ###cmd=run_flac --verify --silent --force --force-raw-format --endian=little --sign=signed --sample-rate=44100 --bps=16 --channels=2 -0 -l 16 --lax -m -e -p --no-padding test04.raw ### DECODE test04 ### ###cmd=run_flac --silent --force --endian=little --sign=signed --decode --force-raw-format --output-name=test04.cmp test04.flac -rw-r--r-- 1 aleksandersen aleksandersen 20 2007-09-15 01:04 test04.raw -rw-r--r-- 1 aleksandersen aleksandersen 132 2007-09-15 01:04 test04.flac -rw-r--r-- 1 aleksandersen aleksandersen 20 2007-09-15 01:04 test04.cmp ### ENCODE fsd8-01 ### ###cmd=run_flac --verify --silent --force --force-raw-format --endian=little --sign=signed --sample-rate=44100 --bps=8 --channels=1 -0 -l 16 --lax -m -e -p --no-padding fsd8-01.raw ### DECODE
Re: [Flac-dev] Testing 24-bit full-scale deflection streams fails
Josh Coalson wrote: Using KUbuntu 7.04 x86_64 using following command: I'm using standard Ubuntu on x86-64 (AMD) and the same test passes on my machine. test_streams.sh makes a huge file called streams.log with a record In fact, I just re-ran that test again and it passed again. Erik -- - Erik de Castro Lopo - Learning OCaml is like a wormhole: a little dark, but there is a new, bigger universe much closer than you realise. -- Chris Alfred ___ Flac-dev mailing list Flac-dev@xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
Re: [Flac-dev] upcoming release, need help
On 9/14/07, Josh Coalson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: checked in to CVS is what will be very close to the 1.2.1 release of flac scheduled for monday. if anyone can try building it and even better running the test suite, and reporting back any problems, that will help me get things in better shape. Checked 2 x86_64 boxes they worked fine, 1 x86 failed a test. Logs (streams, picture, cuesheet) for the failed box attached, please let me know if I can help in any way. -- avuton -- Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell. logs.tar.bz2 Description: BZip2 compressed data ___ Flac-dev mailing list Flac-dev@xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
Re: [Flac-dev] upcoming release, need help
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 06:12:22PM -0700, Ralph Giles wrote: Do you know what features prompted the 1.7 automake version requirement? It seems to work fine with the 1.6.3 distributed by Apple. This was of course my suggestion originally. :P http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2006-November/002019.html I don't remember now if I just asked for 1.7 because that's what I had around to test or not. If you're brave, reduce it to 1.6 and see if anyone has problems. Should make the dist version compile out of the box (modulo asm) on MacOS X. -r ___ Flac-dev mailing list Flac-dev@xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
Re: [Flac-dev] upcoming release, need help
On 9/14/07, Josh Coalson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: the those logs look fine, maybe some other test failed like the unit tests which are unfortunately not logged. could you try running them individually and see if there's a problem (they're relatively quick) $ cd test $ ./test_libFLAC.sh release ./test_libFLAC++.sh release ./test_flac.sh release ./test_metaflac.sh release ./test_seeking.sh release that will stop on the first error Stopped at the attached, but I don't see the error -- avuton -- Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell. test_libFLAC++.log.bz2 Description: BZip2 compressed data ___ Flac-dev mailing list Flac-dev@xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev