Re: [Flac-dev] upcoming release, need help

2007-09-16 Thread Josh Coalson
thanks everyone for the feedback, the cvs tag is down and the release
is almost ready.

FLAC_RELEASE_1_2_1__2007_09_17



   

Moody friends. Drama queens. Your life? Nope! - their life, your story. Play 
Sims Stories at Yahoo! Games.
http://sims.yahoo.com/  
___
Flac-dev mailing list
Flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev


Re: [Flac-dev] upcoming release, need help

2007-09-15 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:

 I'm currently running the tests on :
 
 Linux x86-64
 Mac OSX PowerPC

Both passed. The 1.8GHz AMD64 took 50 minutes, the 500MHz G3 PowerPC
took 461 minutes.

Erik
-- 
-
Erik de Castro Lopo
-
Traditional capital was stuck in a company's bank account or investments.
It could not walk away in disgust. Human capital has free will. It can
walk out the door; traditional capital cannot.
___
Flac-dev mailing list
Flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev


Re: [Flac-dev] upcoming release, need help

2007-09-15 Thread David Rothenberger

On 9/14/2007 2:51 PM, Josh Coalson wrote:

checked in to CVS is what will be very close to the 1.2.1 release
of flac scheduled for monday.  if anyone can try building it and
even better running the test suite, and reporting back any problems,
that will help me get things in better shape.


Built fine and all tests passed under cygwin.

--
David Rothenberger    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Too much is just enough.
-- Mark Twain, on whiskey

___
Flac-dev mailing list
Flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev


Re: [Flac-dev] upcoming release, need help

2007-09-14 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
Josh Coalson wrote:

 checked in to CVS is what will be very close to the 1.2.1 release
 of flac scheduled for monday.  if anyone can try building it and
 even better running the test suite, and reporting back any problems,
 that will help me get things in better shape.

I'm currently running the tests on :

Linux x86-64
Mac OSX PowerPC

Do you plan to revert the changes you made to the function prototypes:

FLAC__metadata_object_picture_set_mime_type
FLAC__metadata_object_picture_set_description

in include/FLAC/metadata.h? Like I stated in a previous email:

http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2007-September/002351.html

If you allow this changes to stay, it will mean that client code
that compiled with no warnings with FLAC 1.2.0 will produce 
warnings with 1.2.1.


Erik
-- 
-
Erik de Castro Lopo
-
Good advice for everyone : stay away from churches, mosques and
synagogues.
___
Flac-dev mailing list
Flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev


Re: [Flac-dev] upcoming release, need help

2007-09-14 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
Avuton Olrich wrote:

 I'd love to, I've got CVS checked out, how do I run this test suite?

   ./configure
   make
   make check

Erik
-- 
-
Erik de Castro Lopo
-
Properly read, the Bible is the most potent force for atheism 
ever conceived -- Isaac Asimov
___
Flac-dev mailing list
Flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev


Re: [Flac-dev] upcoming release, need help

2007-09-14 Thread Josh Coalson
I've decided to put that one off till after the release.  btw
the cvs logs show that change happened between 1.1.2 and 1.1.3,
or do you mean the warnings will come from the extra -W options
you proposed?

--- Erik de Castro Lopo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Josh Coalson wrote:
 
  checked in to CVS is what will be very close to the 1.2.1 release
  of flac scheduled for monday.  if anyone can try building it and
  even better running the test suite, and reporting back any
 problems,
  that will help me get things in better shape.
 
 I'm currently running the tests on :
 
 Linux x86-64
 Mac OSX PowerPC
 
 Do you plan to revert the changes you made to the function
 prototypes:
 
 FLAC__metadata_object_picture_set_mime_type
 FLAC__metadata_object_picture_set_description
 
 in include/FLAC/metadata.h? Like I stated in a previous email:
 
 http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2007-September/002351.html
 
 If you allow this changes to stay, it will mean that client code
 that compiled with no warnings with FLAC 1.2.0 will produce 
 warnings with 1.2.1.
 
 
 Erik


  

Tonight's top picks. What will you watch tonight? Preview the hottest shows on 
Yahoo! TV.
http://tv.yahoo.com/ 

___
Flac-dev mailing list
Flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev


Re: [Flac-dev] upcoming release, need help

2007-09-14 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
Josh Coalson wrote:

 I've decided to put that one off till after the release.  btw
 the cvs logs show that change happened between 1.1.2 and 1.1.3,

Sorry, I think I'm getting confused between what is in your official
tree and some exploratory hacking I was doing where I was trying to 
fix some of these const-correct issues.

The functions I'm talking about were new additions in 2006:


http://flac.cvs.sourceforge.net/flac/flac/include/FLAC/metadata.h?r1=1.53r2=1.54

and not more recently.

Cheers,
Erik
-- 
-
Erik de Castro Lopo
-
I hack, therefore I am.
___
Flac-dev mailing list
Flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev


Re: [Flac-dev] upcoming release, need help

2007-09-14 Thread Avuton Olrich
On 9/14/07, Josh Coalson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 checked in to CVS is what will be very close to the 1.2.1 release
 of flac scheduled for monday.  if anyone can try building it and
 even better running the test suite, and reporting back any problems,
 that will help me get things in better shape.

Checked 2 x86_64 boxes they worked fine, 1 x86 failed a test. Logs
(streams, picture, cuesheet) for the failed box attached, please let
me know if I can help in any way.
-- 
avuton
--
 Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.


logs.tar.bz2
Description: BZip2 compressed data
___
Flac-dev mailing list
Flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev


Re: [Flac-dev] upcoming release, need help

2007-09-14 Thread Ralph Giles
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 06:12:22PM -0700, Ralph Giles wrote:

 Do you know what features prompted the 1.7 automake version requirement? 
 It seems to work fine with the 1.6.3 distributed by Apple.

This was of course my suggestion originally. :P

http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2006-November/002019.html

I don't remember now if I just asked for 1.7 because that's what I had 
around to test or not. If you're brave, reduce it to 1.6 and see if 
anyone has problems. Should make the dist version compile out of the box 
(modulo asm) on MacOS X.

 -r

___
Flac-dev mailing list
Flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev


Re: [Flac-dev] upcoming release, need help

2007-09-14 Thread Avuton Olrich
On 9/14/07, Josh Coalson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 the those logs look fine, maybe some other test failed like the
 unit tests which are unfortunately not logged.  could you try
 running them individually and see if there's a problem (they're
 relatively quick)

 $ cd test
 $ ./test_libFLAC.sh release 
   ./test_libFLAC++.sh release 
   ./test_flac.sh release 
   ./test_metaflac.sh release 
   ./test_seeking.sh release

 that will stop on the first error

Stopped at the attached, but I don't see the error
-- 
avuton
--
 Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.


test_libFLAC++.log.bz2
Description: BZip2 compressed data
___
Flac-dev mailing list
Flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev