Anthony, thank you!
How is it possible?
On 6 June 2010 19:50, Anthony Pace wrote:
> You can bypass this with javascript, and canvas.
>
>
> On 6/5/2010 1:58 PM, Henrik Andersson wrote:
>
>> Pavel Repkin wrote:
>>
>>> Seems to be a question for a Flash security guru.
>>>
>>> Suppose we are loadin
found this in 0.25 seconds, but didn't download to check it:
Yes, Eric, I also found that link in 0.25 seconds, and the download stopped at
31% each of the 3 times I tried to download it. Your response was rude and
condescending.
Maybe you should consider that some of the people that post
You can bypass this with javascript, and canvas.
On 6/5/2010 1:58 PM, Henrik Andersson wrote:
Pavel Repkin wrote:
Seems to be a question for a Flash security guru.
Suppose we are loading an external SWF movie with
MovieClipLoader.loadMovie(url:String) Is it safe to assume that if url
starts wi
Whenever you need to pass a variable number of arguments, check
Function.apply().It generally will be the answer to your problem!
If I understood your problem correctly, this should do what you want:
var args:Array = [0,1,2,3,4,5];
var jsFunctionName:String = "someJsFunction";
var parameters:Arr
What you are suggesting, is almost the same as I suggested, except that
you are avoiding the xml object and instead using a string; however,
because of how a string is converted when passing the data, I wouldn't
recommend it for anything too complex.
On 6/6/2010 7:13 AM, Ashim D'Silva wrote:
The last 2 weeks were crazy and I completely lost track of this so I
apologise for not responding to the answers (cheers though!). We
couldn't find a solution so we used an array instead, but the idea was
this.
I have:
var objs:Array = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]; // arbitrary length defined by the
number of
6 matches
Mail list logo
