[Flashcoders] Seeking Freelance Developer
Hello, I'm looking for a freelance Flash developer who can create a navigation system that works almost exactly like this: http://news.com.com/2104-1006_3-5731398.html If interested, please email [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please provide any links to your work/blog and or resume. If all goes well, this could lead to a very steady stream of freelance work if so desired. Thanks. ~Phil ___ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com
Re: [Flashcoders] Flash Debugger's not up to it.
Heh. Nothing to do now but get old school and trace out the values you want to see. I personally never use the Flash Debugger for reasons like the one you're talking about. I find it a lot faster to just spit out the variables I want to see and debug that way. Xray is the bomb dot com. _global.tt() ftw! ___ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com
[Flashcoders] Re: Intermittent buttons -- problem solved
>> I have two buttons that navigate back and forth through
>> a series of images. (Flash 8, AS2).
>> They work fine when I first open the SWF. But on the same
>> screen is an input textfield with which a user can add or
>> change a title. The title change is saved when the textfield
>> loses focus (via onKillFocus()).
>>
>> The problem is that once the user inputs a title, the two
>> controller buttons only work intermittently -- sometimes once
>> out of every two clicks, but often worse than that. The only
>> way the buttons will work every time is if the user moves the
>> cursor completely off the button and then back on. In that
>> case the buttons work very dependably.
Muzak wrote:
if you're using any of the v2 components add this to the main timeline
function onMouseDown(){
focusManager.enabled = false;
}
funtion onMouseUp() {
focusManager.enabled = true;
}
Ah, excellent. The focusManager suggestion seems to do the trick. And
I'll be combining it with Nick Johnston's suggestion --
Why not try storing the title using a setInterval (say every 2 seconds
and if they make a change to the title it will reset the interval)
rather than onKillFocus()?
Thank you both very much.
::. clive
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com
Re[2]: AW: [Flashcoders] Turn image around effect?
Thats nice to hear :) I heard software developers have a nag to complicate things Guess that would concern me Thanks for the quick reply. I havent worked with flash for over a year now- so i am a bit out of date :) Please share how to do that without having to work a lot Amir Am 10:01 PM 6/30/2007 schrieben Sie: ATR> I believe they programmed a AS3 based 3D ATR> Rasterizer to create this flip - AS3 can do that quite easy since ATR> it provides all necessities to do so : ATR> ATR> ByteArray to hold the pixels ATR> Matrix to do the transforms ATR> BitmapData to manipulate and draw and more Flash 8 has everything what is needed for such an effect. ATR> Besides if content is retrieved from inside a DB ATR> or from some kind of Backend, chances are you ATR> would not have a way to transform the content ON ATR> THE CLIENT - meaning you would have to convert ATR> the content from Text to Image on the Server -- arrghhh sounds tricky :) If you already know BitmapData, probably you are familiar with BitmapData.draw(), too :) Well, I think you are overcomplicating something, this effect is not so hard to create as you expect :) Attila ___ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com ___ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com
Re: [Flashcoders] how to call method in sub-class instace?
Hi stranger , :)
I dont think I quite understand what you need, however i will try anyway.
[quote] "How do you get a super-class instance to call an over-riding
method in a sub-class"
Inheritance assumes that you use a 'general' base class and a
'specialized' subclass. To make sure I understand you right : You
need to call a method on a child class from inside the Parent class,
right ? Does it matter from where you call the method ? As long as
you have a reference to the subclass instance - call the method directly.
class MySuperClass extends Object {
.. important general code here
}
class ChildClass extends MySuperClass {
... important specialized code here
}
var msc:Class = new MySuperClass();
var childRef:ChildClass = msc.getChildClassFromList() as ChildClass;
( I assume the class was stored inside an Array(List) )
childRef.doDesiredAction( 'execute some really important childClass
code' ); // there you go :)
[quote] "Furthermore, any input values not caught by the parsers of
the sub-classes need to get passed back up to the super-class."
Calling a method of the Superclass is easy. Just use 'super'.
var msc:Class = new MySuperClass();
var childRef:ChildClass = msc.getChildClassFromList() as ChildClass;
( I assume the class was stored inside an Array(List) )
class MySuperClass extends Object {
.. important general code here
public function doDesiredAction( arg:String){
super.doGeneralDataProcessing( arg );
}
}
class ChildClass extends MySuperClass {
... important specialized code here
public function doDesiredAction( arg:String){
super.doGeneralDataProcessing( arg );
}
}
childRef.doDesiredAction( 'calls the super class' ); // there you go :)
[quote] "Does this make sense?"
No offense , but no !!! First as a general rule of thumb: 'Favor
Composition over Inheritance' [Sierra|Bates] - Inheritance ties you
down. Say you implement the system as you described
and in 3 months you need to change the BaseClass - suddenly all your
subclasses, needing to call the base class for processing, must be
changed since they all depend on your
base class -> Strategy Pattern is recommended over inheritance ( but
thats just my opinion )
Command Pattern to execute the different Parser Classes.
It seems to me that your classes have high coupling / low Cohesion -
meaning that you use several classes to get one job done , it may
seem like a good idea at first ,
using the specialized class A, the base class B, another specialized
class C and so on to work together and parse the desired data.
However it is advised that each class takes care of One
Responsibility. I dont want to be pretentious, so if you already know
all that , please forgive :)
So I assume you have written one parser for each special file format
- a .xml parser , a .txt parser, a loadVars parser and so on.
They all extend MySuperParser. So why splitting responsibility of
parsing data across base and child classes ?
Has the BaseClass features / responsibilities that all subclasses
need ? if so - fine, just call the base class methods from inside your
specialized subClass Parser BEFORE you do the specialized processing like so :
public function mySubClassSpecializedParsingMethod( specialParam:* ) :void {
super.BaseClassPrepFirst( specialParam );
var preppedData:* = super.getPreppedData(); // I havent
really tried this line :) see wether it works
this.doSpecializedPrepping( preppedData );
}
If you want to freshen up on Composition over Inheritance - This Book
is my all time favoured Design Pattern and Bets Practice Programming
Book !!
HEAD FIRST - DESIGN PATTERNS ( Elisabeth Freeman & Eric Freeman ||
Kathy Sierra || Bert Bates )
This was the best Book about Design Pattern - actually generally
about good Programming.
I hope I was able to help you a bit - did I get it right ? I hope :)
Best of luck
Amir
P.S.
Lingo is NOT OOP -> dont get me wrong ! lingo rocks!!! but its
nothing like ActionScript or Java -> Even the Javascript DOM for
Lingo is strange to say the least :)
But again - lingo rocks!!
Am 11:32 PM 6/29/2007 schrieben Sie:
How do you get a super-class instance to call an over-riding method
in a sub-class? I'm using AS2.
I'm parsing data into an object. The parser method is generalized,
so it should be in the super-class, I think... But there are
exceptions in the sub-classes. The call to start loading the data
begins in the super-class, but some of the sub-classes might have
there own over-riding parser methods. Furthermore, any input values
not caught by the parsers of the sub-classes need to get passed back
up to the super-class.
Does this make sense? I did this kind of thing all the time with
lingo, but since I've been reading Moock I'm trying to write better
OOP. This has got to be a pretty common thing to run across.
Thanks!
RE: AW: [Flashcoders] Turn image around effect?
You could totally do it with magic. ;) http://lab.andre-michelle.com/bitmap-particles-2 http://lab.andre-michelle.com/bitmap-particles -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Zeh Fernando Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2007 1:32 PM To: Rákos Attila; flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com Subject: Re: AW: [Flashcoders] Turn image around effect? No need to look for crazy, magical features to pull the trick. Zeh ___ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com
Re: AW: [Flashcoders] Turn image around effect?
ATR> Besides if content is retrieved from inside a DB ATR> or from some kind of Backend, chances are you ATR> would not have a way to transform the content ON ATR> THE CLIENT - meaning you would have to convert ATR> the content from Text to Image on the Server -- arrghhh sounds tricky :) If you already know BitmapData, probably you are familiar with BitmapData.draw(), too :) Well, I think you are overcomplicating something, this effect is not so hard to create as you expect :) I'd have to agree. It's a nice effect, but it looks like the thing is simply divided into slices that then have their horizontal scale manipulated (with a small delay between slices), nothing more. There's even the typical tearing you'd expect from such a solution. No need to look for crazy, magical features to pull the trick. Zeh ___ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com
Re: [Flashcoders] adapt architecture to facilitate switching component sets
Hi JC,
Your solution is quite good. Using an 'Abstract Interface' is always
encouraged :)
The guideline goes like - 'Program to Abstraction not to Implementation'
Unfortunately AS3 does not (yet:) allow Generics / Collection Type
safety - so we are still forced to make sure we
do the right types, since Casting to the correct type will probably
be the biggest Problem for this code. ( MY opinion )
* 'Composite' is the formal Pattern Name for this type of
architecture - check it out - its worth it !!
BUT if you are planning on using components anyway, you might as well
build the app in Flex
which already offers this Architecture as the base of mxml / As3 code
gen and development.
'Abstract interface' for all Displayable Objects in Flex / AS3 is an
Interface called
- IFlexDisplayObject ( in flash its i believe 'Sprite' but dont nail
me on that :)
- UIComponent is the base class from which each Component MUST be subclassed
So if you use flex there would be no need for you to 're-invent' the
wheel :) no offense I dont mean to imply that you would not be capable
but if you are like me ( like a bit lazy :) you will find the offered
component framework in flex quite
AMAZINGLY GOOD
Your designer can change ANYTHING and EVERYTHING on the compos inside
the Design View ( No Coding !!! )
and you can glue functionality on the comps using DataBinding and a
robust event dispatching model.
As an Example - I built a VideoConference Tool Application( like
breeze or spreed ) - first in Flash 8 - I had to implement all
necessary compos so the designer could 'design' them creatively :) (
Man i wanted to kill that guy )
Sounded much like what you are planning on doing - I took me about 3
Months of just implementing compos - from a simple numeric stepper to
the expandable scroll Accordeon
- altogether around 24 components - boy it was a bitch - and then had
to add Domain Logic. Due to this enormous workload I completely
fragged the deadline - project was killed
For my own personal satisfaction I restarted the project myself -
this time in Flex and it took me about 6 - 7 months to complete it.
Now the Tool is in Beta and
running. Lesson for me was: Use Flex Unless you need to animate
or draw something - use Flex. It harnesses so much power !
And you can really concentrate on your business logic instead of
having to waste your time on building low-level application components.
AND even if you need to show something done in flash ( animated /
tweened / handdrawn ) you can import and display in Flex.
I hope I was able to answer your question right and to give you some
ideas / Suggestions.
Feel free to contact me if you have any questions regarding Flex / AS
3 , I'll be glad to answer them.
Best regards
Amir
Certified Flash Developer
Sun Certified Java Programmer (I.T.)
Am 07:32 AM 6/30/2007 schrieben Sie:
Hi,
we are looking into using another component set than the v2 architecture.
However we don't want to switch over and over again, and frankly as the
architecture developer I dont want anything to do with components at all.
So I was thinking about a setup where I write component interfaces such as
IComboBox and a set of wrappers such as V2ComboBoxAdapter implements
IComboBox.
Next a designer creates a view, and puts something in his view like (im
making it up as I'm typing) :
getComboBox (id:String):IComboBox {
return AbstractFactory.create (V2Adapters.COMBO_BOX, _root.cbPersons);
}
In terms of being independent of my views, I can just start putting an app
together and if the designer dude wants to skin it differently or use a
whole other component set he is free to do so, even mix and match is an
option.
The main thing I'm wondering about is whether I'm gruesomely
overcomplicating things and just causing a heckload of work for no good
reason other than that I am not familiar with a single very good component
set that satisfies all the designer needs (I'm not saying they don't exist,
I'm saying I don't have enough experience in any of them to make a
wellformed decision, and don't really have the time to test them one by
one:)).
Hope this makes any sense!
greetz
JC
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com
Re: [Flashcoders] adapt architecture to facilitate switching component sets
Sounds to me that your over complicating a bit. What you probably could
do is provide a base set of classes for you model/data and then one or
more adapters to add the needed conversion to and from framework
specifics. In general I think that while ease of reuse is a great idea,
you aren't going to be able to achieve it 100% anyway, so its best to
find a compromise between ease of use and ease of reuse (amongst other
considerations). In general it seems to be that actually switching a UI
framework is a major undertaking to begin with (they usually have all
sorts of changes required not just of the model code but also of the
skins, graphics, etc) that it is usually best to pick one and stick with
it until or unless it becomes less painful to switch than to keep using
the existing framework.
Hans Wichman wrote:
Hi,
we are looking into using another component set than the v2 architecture.
However we don't want to switch over and over again, and frankly as the
architecture developer I dont want anything to do with components at all.
So I was thinking about a setup where I write component interfaces
such as
IComboBox and a set of wrappers such as V2ComboBoxAdapter implements
IComboBox.
Next a designer creates a view, and puts something in his view like (im
making it up as I'm typing) :
getComboBox (id:String):IComboBox {
return AbstractFactory.create (V2Adapters.COMBO_BOX, _root.cbPersons);
}
In terms of being independent of my views, I can just start putting an
app
together and if the designer dude wants to skin it differently or use a
whole other component set he is free to do so, even mix and match is an
option.
The main thing I'm wondering about is whether I'm gruesomely
overcomplicating things and just causing a heckload of work for no good
reason other than that I am not familiar with a single very good
component
set that satisfies all the designer needs (I'm not saying they don't
exist,
I'm saying I don't have enough experience in any of them to make a
wellformed decision, and don't really have the time to test them one by
one:)).
Hope this makes any sense!
greetz
JC
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com
Re[2]: AW: [Flashcoders] Turn image around effect?
ATR> I believe they programmed a AS3 based 3D ATR> Rasterizer to create this flip - AS3 can do that quite easy since ATR> it provides all necessities to do so : ATR> ATR> ByteArray to hold the pixels ATR> Matrix to do the transforms ATR> BitmapData to manipulate and draw and more Flash 8 has everything what is needed for such an effect. ATR> Besides if content is retrieved from inside a DB ATR> or from some kind of Backend, chances are you ATR> would not have a way to transform the content ON ATR> THE CLIENT - meaning you would have to convert ATR> the content from Text to Image on the Server -- arrghhh sounds tricky :) If you already know BitmapData, probably you are familiar with BitmapData.draw(), too :) Well, I think you are overcomplicating something, this effect is not so hard to create as you expect :) Attila ___ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com
RE: AW: [Flashcoders] Turn image around effect?
Hi guys , I believe they programmed a AS3 based 3D Rasterizer to create this flip - AS3 can do that quite easy since it provides all necessities to do so : ByteArray to hold the pixels Matrix to do the transforms BitmapData to manipulate and draw and more I am currently working on building a 3D Graphics Engine in AS3 - and if anybody would come to me and ask me to program something like this - that would be the way I would go about it ( but I am a programmer - so my solutions are often very programmer centric - not an animator :) next week I will contact the developer and ask him/them how he / they do/did that :) if he tells :) I am VERY curious wether or not I guessed right What do you guys think about that - would you say my suggestion is correct ? I made a couple of screenshots and noticed that the lines are definitely DRAWN BY FLASH @RUNTIME - look at the Alias its almost nonexistent therefore I believe they are probably using a Bresenham Algo on a BitmapData to draw lines. Think about it, its not as hard as it may sound - all you need is a simple Polygon whithout any depth - no camera , it runs in a fix perspective mode. Then you create a transform matrix ( rotation only ) and transform the Polygon in place ( only inside model space ). The next step would be to create a simple concat Matrix that does the Model-to-Perspective and the Perspective to Screen transform. Done ! well I admit its a shot in the blue - but as i said thats how I would do it. Second question would be the maintainability of 'flippable' content - If they were to use images they would need to 'recreate' each image once its content changes - even twice if they would use two images per flip - doesnt sound maintainable to me :) Besides if content is retrieved from inside a DB or from some kind of Backend, chances are you would not have a way to transform the content ON THE CLIENT - meaning you would have to convert the content from Text to Image on the Server -- arrghhh sounds tricky :) Anyone finds out ... let us know ... this flip is done VERY NICELY - nice craftmanship Have a nice Weekend Amir Am 08:12 PM 6/29/2007 schrieben Sie: If you check the code they are using bitmap classes from http://www.group94.com/. Ask em about com.group94.graphics.TransformImage. It looks like its using triangles and texture bitmapFills. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthias Dittgen Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 3:50 AM To: flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com Subject: Re: AW: [Flashcoders] Turn image around effect? have you tried to contact their developer directly? ;-) 2007/6/29, Peter Oliver Geller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > But when you use the image distortion effect (Bitmap Data) > with a two image flip, it´s tricky to program your mask on the point of > intersection where the image turns around, because on that moment you > display the front and backside and I think group94 use another type of > technique which is definitely easier. > > Hmm or you can really simple do a gradient alpha flow on the two images in > an inversely direction? > > Thanks > Peter > > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Cedric > Muller > Gesendet: Freitag, 29. Juni 2007 11:40 > An: flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com > Betreff: Re: AW: [Flashcoders] Turn image around effect? > > maybe by creating the illusion of only one image that is front and > back ?? > My guess is that there are two images flipped in the same time: one > from visible to invisible and the other one from invisible to visible > > hth, > Cedric > > > I know the card flip effect, > > but I think its more like the effect Jesse Graupmann posted. > > > > The question is how ja shows the image backside??? > > I have no idea how to combine the image distortion to switch from > > front to > > backside and vice versa? > > > > Any ideas? > > > > Peter > > > > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von > > Pedro > > Taranto > > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. Juni 2007 19:37 > > An: flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com > > Betreff: Re: [Flashcoders] Turn image around effect? > > > > Card Flip Effect: > > http://pixelfumes.blogspot.com/2006/07/business-card-flip-effect- > > class-with. > > html > > > > --Pedro Taranto > > > > > > Peter Geller escreveu: > >> Hi list, > >> > >> > >> > >> can somebody give me an answer how this turn around effect was > >> made when > >> you click on the speech bubble? > >> > >> > >> > >> http://www.ja-ik-doe-mee.be/ > >> > >> > >> > >> Or is it done with a visual flatted 3D Image made with > >> http://www.flashsandy.org/ ? > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Another nice technique which interests me is used on this side: > >> > >> http://lab.mathieu-badimon.com/ same technique? > >> > >> > >> > >> Maybe some of you have a link for me how this is done? > >
Re: [Flashcoders] MP3 Attaching issues and Streaming issue on IE
You might also want to try embedding an mp3 in a swf and loading the swf instead. ___ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com
Re: [Flashcoders] MP3 Attaching issues and Streaming issue on IE
Looks right to me. That is pretty much how it's done. I know it sucks, but it's these little tricks that you gotta do to get things to work consistently across browsers. In the greater scheme of things, this is relatively minor when you take into account the insanely dumb stuff that XHTML/JS/CSS developers have to do to make things look consistent across all browsers. I learned Flash to escape from that world, but there are still stupid workarounds you have to do to manage Flash's shortcomings. On the bright side, you're a very resourceful developer since you figured out a solution. :) ___ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com
[Flashcoders] MP3 Attaching issues and Streaming issue on IE
I just finished a project where I needed to use MP3s on demand.
So the first issue was when I used the attachSound method. It worked
perfectly until I tried loading the movie using a loadMovie method
from another movie clip. it appeared as though my attached files
(with an ID name) could not be found or where not included... even
when I tried giving them IDs in the main movie (which was a big
compromise) the loaded movie wasn't able to find them.
so I abandoned this method
then I came across an even more strange bug. When I actually streamed
the MP3s using the loadSound method, and set streaming to 'false', IE
browsers (and ONLY IE browsers) had the most bizarre reaction
they played the MP3s the first time they loaded, but once the MP3s
were chached, it refused to play them... it's as if it wasn't able to
load them if they were already loaded (note that I only tried
this when the clip was included as a loadMovie in another swf). when
I changed streaming to 'true' the problem went away, but I wasn't
happy with it, since the mp3 wasn't playing smoothly in slower
connections...stopping them immediately and having them played onLoad
didn't work as well
my solution was to pass a variable from the PARAM flashVars tag
indicating browser=ie
here's the idiotic code I had to end up with:
my_sound.loadSound(_root.path+"wavs/sc_2_"+myNum+".mp3",true);
if (_root.browser!="ie"){
my_sound.stop();
my_sound.onLoad = function(success:Boolean) {
if (success) {
my_sound.start();
}
}
}
If anyone could shed light on the issue i'd be very grateful
Itai
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com
[Flashcoders] Flash Debugger's not up to it.
I am getting increasingly frustrated trying to debug in the Flash IDE. I see some, but not all of the variables I expect to see as I step through code. Also, when I step to the next line I step to some unexpected line. A google search throws up: trace(), step over/into/outof and our wonderful Xray but nothing on making the Flash debugger do a proper job. Perhaps I am missing something. Can anyone throw any light on this inadequate behaviour? In desperation. John ___ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com
