Re: [Flashcoders] Properly embedding flash with html.

2008-02-04 Thread Jason Lutes
Since I disrespected SWF Object a little in my last post, I should 
backtrack a little to say that, since it's becoming de facto (despite 
what I feel are some typical usability oversights), and if you're 
already comfortable using it, then you should probably just continue to 
use it.


I'm considering whether or not to post what I use somewhere. I may just 
offer streamlining suggestions or coding alternatives to Geoff, Bobby, 
et al via http://code.google.com/p/swfobject/ instead, although they 
seem pretty committed to the development direction already.



-
Jason

Vayu Robins wrote:

Hi Jason.

This custom solution sounds very interesting.  Would you like to share it
with others? Or refer to a similar solution? :-))

Vayu

___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders


Re: [Flashcoders] Properly embedding flash with html.

2008-02-04 Thread Vayu Robins
Hi Jason.

This custom solution sounds very interesting.  Would you like to share it
with others? Or refer to a similar solution? :-))

Vayu


On 2/4/08 6:36 PM, "Jason Lutes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> There are several problems with the Adobe code/solution, and at least
> one was already mentioned. My biggest complaint about it was that its
> JavaScript was so poorly written. (It even generated malformed mark-up
> at one point.)
> 
> Another complaint I have with the Adobe code/solution is one I also have
> for SWF Object. The list of function arguments that are expected when
> embedding Flash media is unnecessarily cumbersome.
> 
> I use a custom solution for embedding my Flash media, in order to keep
> the JavaScript file size down (to under half of the SWF Object
> footprint), to more efficiently (code-wise) do the same kinds of
> (essential) embedding tasks, and to provide a simpler interface for
> embedding.
> 
> It has proven to carry a higher degree of sensible usability (over UFO,
> SWF Object, the Adobe hack, or other) for coding neophytes, as verified
> by co-workers who have harnessed it.
> 
> 
> -
> Jason
> 
> Vlado Krempl wrote:
>> Hello everyone,
>> 
>> Question:
>> When embedding a flash movie in HTML -
>> Is everyone using the Publish settings that flash CS3 comes with
> "AC_RunActiveContent.js etc or
>> is the "SWF OBject still the preferred way?
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> 
>> Vlado Krempl
>> M 0433 781740
> 
> ___
> Flashcoders mailing list
> Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
> http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders


___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders


RE: [Flashcoders] Properly embedding flash with html.

2008-02-04 Thread Merrill, Jason
>>I use a custom solution for embedding my Flash media,

I do the same as you...  never been a fan of Adobe's code or swfobject.

Jason Merrill
Bank of America  
GT&O L&LD Solutions Design & Development 
eTools & Multimedia 

Bank of America Flash Platform Developer Community



 
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders


Re: [Flashcoders] Properly embedding flash with html.

2008-02-04 Thread Jason Lutes
There are several problems with the Adobe code/solution, and at least 
one was already mentioned. My biggest complaint about it was that its 
JavaScript was so poorly written. (It even generated malformed mark-up 
at one point.)


Another complaint I have with the Adobe code/solution is one I also have 
for SWF Object. The list of function arguments that are expected when 
embedding Flash media is unnecessarily cumbersome.


I use a custom solution for embedding my Flash media, in order to keep 
the JavaScript file size down (to under half of the SWF Object 
footprint), to more efficiently (code-wise) do the same kinds of 
(essential) embedding tasks, and to provide a simpler interface for 
embedding.


It has proven to carry a higher degree of sensible usability (over UFO, 
SWF Object, the Adobe hack, or other) for coding neophytes, as verified 
by co-workers who have harnessed it.



-
Jason

Vlado Krempl wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Question:
> When embedding a flash movie in HTML -
> Is everyone using the Publish settings that flash CS3 comes with 
"AC_RunActiveContent.js etc or

> is the "SWF OBject still the preferred way?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Vlado Krempl
> M 0433 781740

___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders


Re: [Flashcoders] Properly embedding flash with html.

2008-02-04 Thread Glen Pike
I use SWFObject, don't like the other as it adds JavaScript to the HTML 
page rather than putting it in an external file.


I also find SWFObject easier to add parameters and express install to as 
well.


Vlado Krempl wrote:

Hello everyone,

Question:
When embedding a flash movie in HTML - 
Is everyone using the Publish settings that flash CS3 comes with  "AC_RunActiveContent.js etc or 
is the "SWF OBject still the preferred way?


Cheers,

Vlado Krempl 
M 0433 781740 
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. 
The contents of this message should be treated as COMMERCIAL IN CONFIDENCE unless otherwise specified in the message

and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is 
addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the sender. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. 
___

Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders


  


--

Glen Pike
01736 759321
www.glenpike.co.uk 
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders


[Flashcoders] Properly embedding flash with html.

2008-02-03 Thread Vlado Krempl
Hello everyone,

Question:
When embedding a flash movie in HTML - 
Is everyone using the Publish settings that flash CS3 comes with  
"AC_RunActiveContent.js etc or 
is the "SWF OBject still the preferred way?

Cheers,

Vlado Krempl 
M 0433 781740 
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. 
The contents of this message should be treated as COMMERCIAL IN CONFIDENCE 
unless otherwise specified in the message
and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is 
addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the sender. If you are 
not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this 
e-mail.
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders