[Flashcoders] Actionscripter 3.0 developers

2008-10-20 Thread LSI001
It seems I may have gotten off to a bad introduction last week. So with your indulgence let me start over.. I am a technical recruiter based in the Washington DC area. I have been a recruiter/owner for 33 years. I ONLY work the developer side of technical recruiting. Although I cannot promi

[Flashcoders] Actionscripter 3.0 developers

2008-10-20 Thread LSI001
It seems I may have gotten off to a bad introduction last week. So with your indulgence let me start over.. I am a technical recruiter based in the Washington DC area. I have been a recruiter/owner for 33 years. I ONLY work the developer side of technical recruiting. Although I cannot promi

Re: [Flashcoders] Actionscripter 3.0 developers

2008-10-18 Thread Pedro Kostelec
I like those job posts only if they post the requirements and the the salary you could get. I am 16 years old, and i wish to become professional in Fl, Ps, Dw and perhaps some more stuff. So, i am interested in what firms need, so i can learn it. And i want to see the salary, to see if it is worth

Re: [Flashcoders] Actionscripter 3.0 developers

2008-10-17 Thread Elia Morling
Don't post job descriptions... bla bla bla bla Stop whining. Elia ___ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

RE: [Flashcoders] Actionscripter 3.0 developers

2008-10-17 Thread Merrill, Jason
Bob Wohl Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 4:38 PM To: Flash Coders List Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Actionscripter 3.0 developers ouch! On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 1:06 PM, Glen Pike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > I'm okay, I don't work for a bank :) > > > Merrill, Jason wrote:

Re: [Flashcoders] Actionscripter 3.0 developers

2008-10-17 Thread Bob Wohl
novative Learning Blog & subscribe. >> >> -Original Message- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael William >> Ypes >> Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 2:56 PM >> To: Flash Coders List >> Subject: Re: [Flashcod

Re: [Flashcoders] Actionscripter 3.0 developers

2008-10-17 Thread Glen Pike
r 17, 2008 4:07 PM To: Flash Coders List Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Actionscripter 3.0 developers I'm okay, I don't work for a bank :) Merrill, Jason wrote: In my opinion, this is a Flash/Flex/Actionscript job, not an SAP, Java, or plumbing. So it's legit. Dave our moderator ha

RE: [Flashcoders] Actionscripter 3.0 developers

2008-10-17 Thread Merrill, Jason
chnologies? Check out our internal  Innovative Learning Blog & subscribe. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glen Pike Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 4:07 PM To: Flash Coders List Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Actionscripter 3.0 develope

Re: [Flashcoders] Actionscripter 3.0 developers

2008-10-17 Thread Glen Pike
: Flash Coders List Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Actionscripter 3.0 developers And let the floodgates open. This is exactly what I was on about, you say its ok for one and then they all jump on the band wagon. They don't even put a name on it. Isn't that called spamming... Seriously, w

Re: [Flashcoders] Actionscripter 3.0 developers

2008-10-17 Thread Bob Wohl
Job post are great if they are required to post how much they're paying ;) Agencies can suck. I'm not a fan and have been burnt in the past. But I think it's better to allow flash related jobs than to not allow any. but... meh.. it's just my two cents. B. On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 12:13 PM, Glen P

RE: [Flashcoders] Actionscripter 3.0 developers

2008-10-17 Thread Merrill, Jason
es? Check out our internal  Innovative Learning Blog & subscribe. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael William Ypes Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 2:56 PM To: Flash Coders List Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Actionscripter 3.0 de

RE: [Flashcoders] Actionscripter 3.0 developers

2008-10-17 Thread Kerry Thompson
Michael William Ypes wrote: > And let the floodgates open. > > This is exactly what I was on about, you say its ok for one and then > they all jump on the band wagon. They don't even put a name on it. > Isn't that called spamming... Allow me to politely disagree. I don't see it as spam at al

Re: [Flashcoders] Actionscripter 3.0 developers

2008-10-17 Thread Glen Pike
>>Oh, and by the way could you get any more generic with the job spec, they all sound the same... If they were half decent recruiters, they would have a company name instead of some jerkoff email address. My friend was telling me this happened to a list in Sweden -

Re: [Flashcoders] Actionscripter 3.0 developers

2008-10-17 Thread Michael William Ypes
And let the floodgates open. This is exactly what I was on about, you say its ok for one and then they all jump on the band wagon. They don't even put a name on it. Isn't that called spamming... Seriously, wheres the test to see if these people are actually members of the community or

[Flashcoders] Actionscripter 3.0 developers

2008-10-17 Thread LSI001
URGENTLY NEEDED – ACTIONSCRIPT 3.0/FLEX DEVELOPERS IN BETHESDA MARYLAND Job Description We are looking for an experienced, innovative and technically strong Flash/Flex Developer. The ideal candidate must have a strong background skilled in the Adobe platform's technologies and have a passio