On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 01:45:01PM +0200, Matthias Dittgen wrote:
> @strk:
>
> I should try
> var func:String = "register";
> Object[func](args);
>
> instead of
> Object.registerClass(args);
>
> to see, if an all code based attempt is working without having the
> compiler do EXPORT tags.
Yes pl
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 03:17:32PM +0200, Matthias Dittgen wrote:
> Have your received my email with the Test SWF?
Yes, thanks. Haven't looked at it yet but I plan to do next week.
> > What's an RSL ?
> Remote Shared Library.
Mat, you're being *very* helpful !
I drafted a page on our wiki for u
Have your received my email with the Test SWF?
> What's an RSL ?
Remote Shared Library.
Imagine Main.swf loading Sub.swf.
Sub.swf consists of Library Symbol exported for AS and for "runtime sharing"!
Then in Main.swf Symbols from Sub.swf can be attached as if they were
directly in Main.swf.
Symb
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 10:38:52AM +0100, Peter Hall wrote:
> The code on my old blog works for content published with Flash
> authoring. However, it works because Flash inserts the export tags in
> the swf automatically. If you have a swf that has a working
> attachMovie, but no export tags, then
@strk:
I should try
var func:String = "register";
Object[func](args);
instead of
Object.registerClass(args);
to see, if an all code based attempt is working without having the
compiler do EXPORT tags.
I have attached a test situation build in current FlashDevelop on
WinXP as AS2 project.
Let u
The code on my old blog works for content published with Flash
authoring. However, it works because Flash inserts the export tags in
the swf automatically. If you have a swf that has a working
attachMovie, but no export tags, then it must be attaching the symbol
from another swf. An RSL perhaps?
P
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 10:01:37AM +0200, Matthias Dittgen wrote:
> if you mean EXPORT tags in the swf bytecode,
> I am not aware of the tags that are written by the compiler when using
> the code explained by Peter Joel, but I could imagine, that when using
> MTASC for compiling only DOACTION tag
> Talking about SWF8:
which btw. means Actionscript 2.0 (AS2)
> Thank you for the pointer, but reading that article doesn't
> help me much. For example, I don't understand if the resulting
> SWF from that syntax is expected to contain EXPORT tags or not.
if you mean EXPORT tags in the swf bytecode
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 09:45:56AM +0200, Matthias Dittgen wrote:
> You're talking about AS2?
Talking about SWF8:
http://dailymotion.alice.it/flash/dmplayer/dmplayer.swf
> See here for the answer:
> http://www.peterjoel.com/blog/?archive=2004_01_01_archive.xml
Thank you for the pointer, but read
You're talking about AS2?
See here for the answer:
http://www.peterjoel.com/blog/?archive=2004_01_01_archive.xml
This way you can attach classes that don't have a library symbol but
extend MovieClip.
These classes can for example have visual content using the drawing API.
Have fun!
Matthias
On
I've found a few movies out there using attachMovie()
with symbol names which are NOT exported in the SWF
movie containing the call.
Are the SWF bogus (containing useless actionscript)
or is there another interpretation of attachMovie()
first argument ?
--strk;
() ASCII Ribbon Campaign
/\
11 matches
Mail list logo
