Re: [Flashcoders] 500 blur filters on 500 MCs

2007-03-23 Thread Omar Fouad

WOW... Is Fuse That Great
But what is the Difference... Isnt it using the same Panner,  easing
equations?


On 3/21/07, Ryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Heres and example of 50 and animating them at 30 fps using fuse.  The
code is on the page so copy and paste change 50 to 500 and watch it
crush your machine. :)
http://www.thoughtwillrise.com/2006/02/27/random-clips-blur-tween/

At least this should save you the time of coding it.  It requires Fuse.

Ryan



Mick G wrote:
> Just curious if anyone has had experience working with filters on a
large
> number of movieclips.
>
> I have 500 - 1000 movieclips on stage (not animating) and I want to
apply
> various different blur filters and other filters to these movieclips. I
> can't use one big parent clip and apply a filter to that because each
> MC may
> very well have different filter values (and each could be layered in a
> specific order).
>
> Just curious if anyone has done something similar and if they noticed
how
> well the flash player handled it.
>
> Thanks
> Mick
> ___
> Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
> To change your subscription options or search the archive:
> http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
>
> Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
> Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
> http://www.figleaf.com
> http://training.figleaf.com
>
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com





--
Omar Fouad - Digital Emotions...

Love is always patient and kind. It is never jealous. Love is never boastful
nor conceited It is never rude or selfish. It does not take offense and is
not resentful. Love takes no pleasure in other people's sins...but delights
in the truth. It is always ready to excuse, to trust, to hope... and to
endure... whatever comes.
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com


Re: [Flashcoders] 500 blur filters on 500 MCs

2007-03-20 Thread Ryan
Heres and example of 50 and animating them at 30 fps using fuse.  The 
code is on the page so copy and paste change 50 to 500 and watch it 
crush your machine. :)

http://www.thoughtwillrise.com/2006/02/27/random-clips-blur-tween/

At least this should save you the time of coding it.  It requires Fuse.

Ryan



Mick G wrote:

Just curious if anyone has had experience working with filters on a large
number of movieclips.

I have 500 - 1000 movieclips on stage (not animating) and I want to apply
various different blur filters and other filters to these movieclips. I
can't use one big parent clip and apply a filter to that because each 
MC may

very well have different filter values (and each could be layered in a
specific order).

Just curious if anyone has done something similar and if they noticed how
well the flash player handled it.

Thanks
Mick
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com


___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com


Re: [Flashcoders] 500 blur filters on 500 MCs

2007-03-20 Thread Snepo - Arse
cacheAsBitmap will rasterise all vectors every time you scale or  
rotate a clip.


the superCacheAsBitmap draws an MC to a bitmap object which is then  
scaled and rotated... thus not needing to re-cache to bitmap every  
frame.


Arse
www.snepo.com
www.arseiam.com


On 21/03/2007, at 10:28 AM, Mick G wrote:

OK, after researching more I found out that applying a filter to a MC  
will

actually turn bitmapcaching on for that MC anyway.

I did stumble on this which is interesting:
http://www.sebleedelisle.com/?p=35
Anyone know the theory of how this works?


On 3/20/07, Mick G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Thanks for the reply Steven - I understand I'm pushing things here.

Would you think cacheasbitmap would help in this situation? If you  
apply a
blur to a MC, then cacheasbitmap, does that convert the MC with  
blur to a

cached bitmap?
If so, my guess is it would probably help the cpu, but take a huge  
amount

of ram.


On 3/20/07, Steven Sacks | BLITZ < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 500 MCs is gonna be a hit already on VM1, 500 blurred MCs?  Best of
> luck.
>
> AS3/FP9 you'll have better performance but 500 blurs seems like  
lot.  I
> would suggest you write some an algorithm that creates groups of  
clips

> with the same blur into container clips and blur the container clips
> rather than all the individual clips.
> ___
> Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
> To change your subscription options or search the archive:
> http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
>
> Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
> Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
> http://www.figleaf.com
> http://training.figleaf.com
>



___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com

___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com


Re: [Flashcoders] 500 blur filters on 500 MCs

2007-03-20 Thread Snepo - Arse
as2 is out of the question as it will struggle with 500+ clips  
without blurring.


I've built a 3d engine in as3 that runs about 150 mcs all with  
independent blurring. It currently supports 120 mcs at a solid frame  
rate, starts to struggle at around 180 and begins to seriously drop  
rate at 250+ clips. The clips are all around 25x25 pixels and contain  
basic shapes.


Steve's suggestion of grouping clips into common blur is probably  
your best shot. Anything you can do to reduce the number of blur  
filters will be beneficial. There are some sneaky tricks with drawing  
to bitmap objects then re-blurring (e.g. http://www.snepo.com/ 
experiments/Growth.html) but it really depends on what you are trying  
to achieve.


cacheAsBitmap is not going to offer any help as applying blur filters  
automatically forces cacheAsBitmap to true. Additionaly if you are  
scaling or rotating the clips then they need to re-cache every time  
anyway. At least that is my understanding of bitmap caching.


Regards,

Arse
www.snepo.com
www.arseiam.com


On 21/03/2007, at 10:09 AM, Mick G wrote:

Thanks for the reply Steven - I understand I'm pushing things here.

Would you think cacheasbitmap would help in this situation? If you  
apply a
blur to a MC, then cacheasbitmap, does that convert the MC with blur  
to a

cached bitmap?
If so, my guess is it would probably help the cpu, but take a huge  
amount of

ram.


On 3/20/07, Steven Sacks | BLITZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


500 MCs is gonna be a hit already on VM1, 500 blurred MCs?  Best of
luck.

AS3/FP9 you'll have better performance but 500 blurs seems like  
lot.  I

would suggest you write some an algorithm that creates groups of clips
with the same blur into container clips and blur the container clips
rather than all the individual clips.
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com


___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com

___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com


Re: [Flashcoders] 500 blur filters on 500 MCs

2007-03-20 Thread Mick G

OK, after researching more I found out that applying a filter to a MC will
actually turn bitmapcaching on for that MC anyway.

I did stumble on this which is interesting:
http://www.sebleedelisle.com/?p=35
Anyone know the theory of how this works?


On 3/20/07, Mick G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Thanks for the reply Steven - I understand I'm pushing things here.

Would you think cacheasbitmap would help in this situation? If you apply a
blur to a MC, then cacheasbitmap, does that convert the MC with blur to a
cached bitmap?
If so, my guess is it would probably help the cpu, but take a huge amount
of ram.


On 3/20/07, Steven Sacks | BLITZ < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 500 MCs is gonna be a hit already on VM1, 500 blurred MCs?  Best of
> luck.
>
> AS3/FP9 you'll have better performance but 500 blurs seems like lot.  I
> would suggest you write some an algorithm that creates groups of clips
> with the same blur into container clips and blur the container clips
> rather than all the individual clips.
> ___
> Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
> To change your subscription options or search the archive:
> http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
>
> Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
> Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
> http://www.figleaf.com
> http://training.figleaf.com
>



___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com


Re: [Flashcoders] 500 blur filters on 500 MCs

2007-03-20 Thread Latcho

hey gus,

shouldn't there be another forum "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Mick G wrote:

Just curious if anyone has had experience working with filters on a large
number of movieclips.

I have 500 - 1000 movieclips on stage (not animating) and I want to apply
various different blur filters and other filters to these movieclips. I
can't use one big parent clip and apply a filter to that because each 
MC may

very well have different filter values (and each could be layered in a
specific order).

Just curious if anyone has done something similar and if they noticed how
well the flash player handled it.

Thanks
Mick
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com



___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com


Re: [Flashcoders] 500 blur filters on 500 MCs

2007-03-20 Thread Mick G

Thanks for the reply Steven - I understand I'm pushing things here.

Would you think cacheasbitmap would help in this situation? If you apply a
blur to a MC, then cacheasbitmap, does that convert the MC with blur to a
cached bitmap?
If so, my guess is it would probably help the cpu, but take a huge amount of
ram.


On 3/20/07, Steven Sacks | BLITZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


500 MCs is gonna be a hit already on VM1, 500 blurred MCs?  Best of
luck.

AS3/FP9 you'll have better performance but 500 blurs seems like lot.  I
would suggest you write some an algorithm that creates groups of clips
with the same blur into container clips and blur the container clips
rather than all the individual clips.
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com


___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com


RE: [Flashcoders] 500 blur filters on 500 MCs

2007-03-20 Thread Steven Sacks | BLITZ
500 MCs is gonna be a hit already on VM1, 500 blurred MCs?  Best of
luck.

AS3/FP9 you'll have better performance but 500 blurs seems like lot.  I
would suggest you write some an algorithm that creates groups of clips
with the same blur into container clips and blur the container clips
rather than all the individual clips.
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com