Can you give an example of the memory leak you are talking about and
also an example of the arguments.caller remove listener? I have not
heard of this before.
Is the memory leak issue caused when you nest a function inside a class?
class myClass {
function myClass() {
yeah. the type property can be whatever, as long as you know what you are
listening for all is good.
On 2/17/06, Jamie Alpers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This may be a duh question, but when you use dispatchEvent in a custom
created component, can I use my own event name or do i have to use one
If you are using Flex2 , create a custom event that extends from the
event class. and inject the namespace for the custom event into the
superclass.
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
Thanks. I relooked at my code and realized i was just making a stupid
mistake by confusing object names. it works now :-)
On 2/17/06, Johannes Nel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yeah. the type property can be whatever, as long as you know what you are
listening for all is good.
On 2/17/06, Jamie
Just make sure int he constructor you initialize it::
EventDispatcher.initialize(this)..
also you ned to have these var definititions:
public var addEventListener:Function
public var removeEventListener:Function;
private var dispatchEvent:Function
then to dispatch:
dispatchEvent( {
Must resist...the crack...habbit...
and if you want to point that dispatched to a custom method not named
the same as the event:
obj.addEventListener(onWhatever, Delegate.create(this, myCustomMethod));
private function myCustomMethod(evtObj:Object):Void
{
// code
}
Also, you don't need
what john is outlining here is fine in essence, but unless you never want to
remove this event listener this will cause a memory leak. either you create
the delegate function on a class scope or you use arguments.caller in the
handler function to remove the event listener
On 2/17/06, John Grden
7 matches
Mail list logo
