Re: RE: [SPAM?] RE: [Flashcoders] XPcomponents set

2006-06-29 Thread John Mark Hawley
DepthManager and FocusManager cause a few headaches for people used to working without the MM components. Granted, nowhere near as bad as XP is sounding in this thread, but still... -mark hawley From: Steven Sacks | BLITZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2006/06/29 Thu PM 02:39:22 CDT To:

Re: RE: [SPAM?] RE: [Flashcoders] XPcomponents set

2006-06-29 Thread Jim Kremens
I think that's false. There are lots of people who are interested in using frameworks and using them completely. We have to agree to disagree on this one. Thinking about it again, I think you're right on one point. There's certainly no reason that using their framework should break native

Re: RE: [SPAM?] RE: [Flashcoders] XPcomponents set

2006-06-29 Thread Scott Hyndman
Thinking about it again, I think you're right on one point. There's certainly no reason that using their framework should break native Flash code. That's just sloppy. But, as it is a framework, I think it's totally legit that it makes you do certain things certain ways. I wouldn't say

RE: RE: [SPAM?] RE: [Flashcoders] XPcomponents set

2006-06-29 Thread Steven Sacks | BLITZ
Case in point - to use Rails, you must do things inn VERY specific ways. Rails is all about convention, and if you don't adhere to its conventions, you will be boned. Not true. For example, one of the conventions Rails uses to make things easier is their naming conventions, specifically,