[flashrom] Re: Info

2019-10-06 Thread Antonio Ospite
t; > something to reduce the voltage? > > This is the first I've heard of this too. If anybody has any examples I > would be greatly appreciative. > See https://ao2.it/111 The interesting bits are from "In order to flash at 1.8V [...]". Ciao, Antonio -- Antonio Ospite htt

Re: [flashrom] Fwd: Intel QS77 chipet on MBA 2012

2018-10-26 Thread Antonio Ospite
at part can be removed from the -p option. Your command line becomes: # flashrom -p internal:ich_spi_force=yes -c "MX25L6406E/MX25L6408E" -V -w /home/m00n/nueva.rom Note that flashrom also says that it takes no responsibility for any damage; so, before proceeding, I'd check if fla

Re: [flashrom] [PATCH] Fix compilation with older MinGW versions

2018-03-13 Thread Antonio Ospite
On Sat, 3 Mar 2018 19:07:15 +0100 Antonio Ospite <a...@ao2.it> wrote: > The __MINGW_PRINTF_FORMAT constant has been defined back in 2012 > https://sourceforge.net/p/mingw-w64/mingw-w64/ci/77bc5d6103b5fb9f59fbddab1583e69549913312/ > > However older toolchains are still ar

[flashrom] [PATCH] Fix compilation with older MinGW versions

2018-03-03 Thread Antonio Ospite
. Setting __MINGW_PRINTF_FORMAT to gnu_printf is exactly what newer MinGW versions do when __USE_MINGW_ANSI_STDIO is defined, which it is in flashrom Makefile. Tested-by: Miklos Marton <martonmiklosq...@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Antonio Ospite <a...@ao2.it> --- flash.h | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 ins

Re: [flashrom] Building on Windows with mingw

2018-02-28 Thread Antonio Ospite
t; [...] > This method compiles without warnings. Thank you very much! > Are you planning to submit a patch to flashrom, or should we handle that? > I can do it during the week-end. Ciao, Antonio -- Antonio Ospite https://ao2.it https://twitter.com/ao2it A: Because it messes up the o

Re: [flashrom] Building on Windows with mingw

2018-02-27 Thread Antonio Ospite
applied when using MinGW. JFYI I decided for a less backward compatible solution in the other project: https://git.ao2.it/libam7xxx.git/commitdiff/bbebd199987581ee6f344c89bfb02237dc0ab0bd Ciao, Antonio -- Antonio Ospite https://ao2.it https://twitter.

Re: [flashrom] Building on Windows with mingw

2018-02-27 Thread Antonio Ospite
e will compile. If the change looks good I can forward it through the proper channels. BTW are patches sent via git-send-email accepted? Ciao, Antonio -- Antonio Ospite https://ao2.it https://twitter.com/ao2it A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. See http://en

Re: [flashrom] Future flashrom development

2017-10-13 Thread Antonio Ospite
es can be used to track and support stable releases long term, and wild experiments can still be done in topic branches, can't they? Ciao, Antonio -- Antonio Ospite https://ao2.it https://twitter.com/ao2it A: Because it messes up the order in which peopl

Re: [flashrom] Namespace prefix for libflashrom

2017-04-24 Thread Antonio Ospite
bflashrom_ (I would tolerate it, it's still better than cryptic prefixes); and maybe one I didn't see: - libfr_ (flash-rom is two words, so "fr" as abbreviation makes sense, but there's really no need to be so concise). Ciao ciao, Antonio -- Antonio Ospite https://ao2

Re: [flashrom] Release numbering and branches

2016-08-11 Thread Antonio Ospite
external users of the library can decide what version to depend on, and packagers have a well-defined scheme for tracking the soname. Just my 2c. As always thanks for flashrom, and congrats on the git repository. Ciao ciao, Antonio -- Antonio Ospite http://ao2.it A: Because i

Re: [flashrom] flashrom support for Spansion S25FL128S

2015-02-17 Thread Antonio Ospite
, S25FL128S..0, S25FL128S..1, S25FL129P..0, S25FL129P..1 Please specify which chip definition to use with the -c chipname option. IOT just do what flashrom is telling you here :) Ciao, Antonio -- Antonio Ospite http://ao2.it A: Because it messes up the order in which people

Re: [flashrom] please reject my two previous letters

2015-01-10 Thread Antonio Ospite
git now, just ignore what I wrote, it may even be more confusing to newcomers, I know. :) Ciao, Antonio -- Antonio Ospite http://ao2.it A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing

[flashrom] Intel Bay Trail read report

2014-11-23 Thread Antonio Ospite
accessing the SPI flash physically for external programming can be a little more inconvenient for a tablet. Another question: would it be possible to use flashrom to only reset the firmware _settings_, while leaving the code untouched? Thanks, Antonio [1] http://ao2.it/110 -- Antonio Ospite http

Re: [flashrom] [PATCH] Add support for S25FL128P, S25FL129P and refine it for S25FL128S chips.

2014-08-06 Thread Antonio Ospite
below. Thanks. Signed-off-by: Stefan Tauner stefan.tau...@alumni.tuwien.ac.at Tested-by: Antonio Ospite a...@ao2.it --- cli_classic.c | 2 +- flashchips.c | 182 +- flashchips.h | 2 +- 3 files changed, 181 insertions(+), 5

Re: [flashrom] [PATCH 0/5] check_trans and probe_spi_rdid_edi

2014-06-30 Thread Antonio Ospite
On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 18:00:03 +0200 Antonio Ospite a...@ao2.it wrote: On Wed, 3 Oct 2012 06:13:00 +0200 Stefan Tauner stefan.tau...@student.tuwien.ac.at wrote: This patch set enables us to figure out if transactions will succeed without executing them, which allows for a refactoring

Re: [flashrom] [PATCH 0/5] check_trans and probe_spi_rdid_edi

2014-06-30 Thread Antonio Ospite
On Mon, 30 Jun 2014 14:38:15 +0200 Antonio Ospite a...@ao2.it wrote: [...] Found Spansion flash chip S25FL129P..1 (16384 kB, SPI) on ft2232_spi. FTR I actually have a S25FL129P..0, the one with 64 kB sectors. I had the chip IDs swapped in the patch. Fixed locally. Ciao, Antonio

Re: [flashrom] [PATCH] Add support for S25FL128P and S25FL128P......0 chips.

2014-06-30 Thread Antonio Ospite
On Sun, 29 Jun 2014 13:29:00 +0200 Antonio Ospite a...@ao2.it wrote: On Fri, 13 Jun 2014 10:41:39 +0200 Stefan Tauner stefan.tau...@alumni.tuwien.ac.at wrote: Thanks for the test, there are two issues here. One is that I swapped the erase block sizes of the P models. This is clearly shown

Re: [flashrom] [PATCH] Add support for S25FL128P and S25FL128P......0 chips.

2014-06-29 Thread Antonio Ospite
. Thanks, Antonio -- Antonio Ospite http://ao2.it A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? ___ flashrom mailing list flashrom

Re: [flashrom] [PATCH 0/5] check_trans and probe_spi_rdid_edi

2014-06-27 Thread Antonio Ospite
also tried to rebase this old set about check_trans() and probe_spi_rdid_edi() on top of the latest svn, I will check if the code still works but I wanted to ask first what the current status is, and if there is still interest to support rdid EDI. Thanks, Antonio -- Antonio Ospite http://ao2

Re: [flashrom] [RFC, PATCH] Add read support for the Spansion S25FL129P flash chip

2012-10-15 Thread Antonio Ospite
On Wed, 3 Oct 2012 15:11:57 +0200 Stefan Tauner stefan.tau...@student.tuwien.ac.at wrote: On Tue, 2 Oct 2012 12:29:28 +0200 Antonio Ospite osp...@studenti.unina.it wrote: PS: i have committed some ft2232_spi changes lately (r1608 - r1610). i would be glad if you would upgrade and report

Re: [flashrom] [PATCH 4/5] Generify probe_spi_rdid_generic() and add probe_spi_rdid_edi().

2012-10-15 Thread Antonio Ospite
(struct flashctx *flash); +int probe_spi_rdid_edi(struct flashctx *flash); int probe_spi_rems(struct flashctx *flash); int probe_spi_res1(struct flashctx *flash); int probe_spi_res2(struct flashctx *flash); -- Antonio Ospite http://ao2.it A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally

Re: [flashrom] [RFC, PATCH] Add read support for the Spansion S25FL129P flash chip

2012-10-02 Thread Antonio Ospite
On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 05:09:05 +0200 Stefan Tauner stefan.tau...@student.tuwien.ac.at wrote: On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 13:50:54 +0200 Antonio Ospite osp...@studenti.unina.it wrote: http://www.spansion.com/Support/Datasheets/S25FL129P_00.pdf http://www.spansion.com/Support/Application%20Notes

[flashrom] [RFC, PATCH] Add read support for the Spansion S25FL129P flash chip

2012-09-26 Thread Antonio Ospite
http://www.spansion.com/Support/Datasheets/S25FL129P_00.pdf http://www.spansion.com/Support/Application%20Notes/S25FL129P_Prog_Guide_AN.pdf Signed-off-by: Antonio Ospite osp...@studenti.unina.it --- Hi, I was able to read the content of the flash chip in the subject with the patch below but I