r LPC).
- It's likely this delay isn't needed for SPI because of all of this,
so let's consider skipping the delay for SPI. It's what most (but not
all) people use these flashrom for these days.
- Even if some non-SPI chips don't need the delay, it's much harder to
test this. Plus, keepi
Hi Brian, list,
Thanks for bringing this up on the mailing list.
On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 9:16 PM Brian Norris wrote:
>
> Background: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/80807
>
> A long time ago, in the pre-git times [1], flashrom added a 1 second
> delay to all verification, and claimed
Hi Richard,
Maybe it's not intentional, but your email sounds rather unpleasant
and very confusing. What would you like to achieve?
Also, out of curiosity, did you see
https://mail.coreboot.org/hyperkitty/list/flashrom@flashrom.org/message/65BNRWRTKLTMS7EDOGCN2NJYIFX5QXBV/
before writing your
Hi all (again),
We (Angel) just took the time to reorder the previous replies so that
we can respond to them in-line.
On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 11:34 AM Richard Hughes wrote:
>
> On Mon, 17 Oct 2022 at 12:24, Edward O'Callaghan wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 17 Oct 2022 at 20:27, Richard Hughes wrote:
Hi list,
We (Angel) sense that this thread might potentially drift towards an
unpleasant direction and we think the outcome wouldn't be
forward-useful, i.e. it would make things worse. How are all of you
doing? Is anyone feeling hurt?
On Sat, Oct 15, 2022 at 11:53 AM Nico Huber wrote:
>
> Hi
Hi Sami,
On Sat, Oct 15, 2022 at 7:44 PM Sami via flashrom wrote:
>
> Is there anything I can do anymore?
See in-line messages.
> // Sami
>
> flashrom --programmer internal --ifd -i bios --noverify-all -w Z87A.bin
> flashrom v1.2 on Linux 5.10.0-18-amd64 (x86_64)
> flashrom is free software,
Hi all,
Having this documentation added to the flashrom Wiki sounds like a
great idea. Thank you for the proposal!
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 12:11 PM Sergii Dmytruk
wrote:
>
> Hi Anastasia,
>
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 01:36:38PM +1100, Anastasia Klimchuk wrote:
> > I looked through the website,
Hi Nils,
On Sun, Oct 2, 2022 at 9:25 PM Nils Woeste wrote:
>
> Hi, I encountered an Issue with flashing a BIOS and the message says
> "Get help on IRC at chat.freenode.net (channel #flashrom)"
>
> this points to an old server not monitored. The correct one (Libera.chat)
> should also be
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 2:23 AM J. Craft wrote:
>
> Let me know if there's anything else needed and what might be suggested in
> this situation.
*snip*
> 0x84: 0x89ef09d0 PR0: Warning: 0x009d-0x009e is read-only.
flashrom errors out because this region is read-only. I'm pretty
Hi Charles,
On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 2:13 PM Charles Parent
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> First thank you a lot for your amazing work on flashrom, I just discovered
> this software and it saved me a lot of time lately !
>
> I use it to flash a MT25QU256 through a FTDI4233H, and as software is
> telling me
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 10:06 AM Jd Lyons via flashrom
wrote:
>
> What is the correct command to run flashrom for Promise ATA chipsets?
>
> Flashrom —programmer atapromise doesn’t work.
The atapromise programmer isn't compiled in by default. I'm pretty
sure it's because it cannot be used as
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 23, 2022 at 9:49 AM Mike Banon wrote:
>
> Good day! The flashrom software has the "internal" mode - using which,
> you may be able to access the BIOS chip directly from your OS, if your
> hardware is supported. In example:
>
> sudo flashrom -p
>
Hi Billy,
On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 8:23 AM Billy Croan wrote:
>
> I've been tasked with updating bioses on some machines we have which have no
> manufacturer support. They were made by Quanta I think, as part of
> OpenCompute project. I have several boards that area all physically the
> same,
Hi Rob,
On Sun, Oct 31, 2021 at 10:18 PM David Hendricks
wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 31, 2021 at 10:10 AM Rob Shore wrote:
>>
>> Hello!
>>
>> I've just discovered Flashrom as a way to use a Dediprog SPI programmer with
>> MacOS, which is awesome. I've got a bit of a strange question though:
>>
>>
ion. That might
> help you make up your mind.
It is very simple: the `-o` command-line option is unusable on the
distributions which have switched to meson to build flashrom.
> Richard
> ___
> flashrom mailing list -- flashrom@flashro
Hi Clay,
On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 8:23 PM Clay Daniels wrote:
>
> Looking for schematic for:
> MSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37)
>
> Ivan Ivanov pointed out a very nice detailed view which I could not find in
> MSI marketing propaganda, and it looks like I will need to use a CH341A
> external
Hi list,
On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 9:07 PM Clay Daniels wrote:
>
> Congrats, Aspen. I have a MSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37) Motherboard and trying to
> get flashrom v1.2 on FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT to recognize my mb. Looking at the
> supported hardware at https://www.flashrom.org/Supported_hardware I
Hi Stephen,
On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 12:51 PM Stephen Wong wrote:
>
> Hello guys
>
> i have a laptop equipped with GIGADEVICE chip, attached the photo for
> the ram chip
I don't see any RAM chip in the picture. That GigaDevice chip is a
flash chip, though. Looks like it's a 512 KiB (kibibytes)
Hi there,
On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 12:49 PM Gjglesias wrote:
>
> Please add winbond w25Q32bva in next update
This flash chip is already supported, but we call it "W25Q32.V"
because it also covers, e.g., "W25Q32JV". If flashrom can't detect
this chip, it might be due to an electrical problem.
>
shrom.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to flashrom-le...@flashrom.org
Best regards,
Angel Pons
___
flashrom mailing list -- flashrom@flashrom.org
To unsubscribe send an email to flashrom-le...@flashrom.org
Hi Richard, Jonathan, and everyone else,
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 12:00 PM Richard Hughes wrote:
>
> On Tue, 26 May 2020 at 00:20, Angel Pons wrote:
> > So, given that meson produces broken executables and nobody seems to
> > be actively taking care of it
>
>
Dear flashrom community,
Currently, flashrom has support for two different build systems: the
traditional Makefile-based approach, and meson. The latter was
introduced not too long ago [1] to be used by the fwupd project.
However, as far as I am concerned, it is currently not used for
Hi Nikos,
On Wed, May 20, 2020, 07:46 Nikos Mouzakitis wrote:
> Hello this is my output when trying to flash..
>
> Does Incomplete/failed Command Receive Device string plays a role on
> the error of verification?
> I cannot flash back the original bios contents at the moment on my board.
>
>
asheet for these Xeons.
> Anyway, thank you very much for the support.
>
> Thanks,
> Best Regards,
> Ocean
>
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 11:08 PM Angel Pons wrote:
>>
>> Hi Ocean,
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 2:00 PM Ocean Huang via flashrom
>>
Thanks,
> Best Regards,
> Ocean
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Best Regards,
> Ocean Huang
> BIOS Engineer
> Celestica(Shanghai) R Center, China
> email: hah...@celestica.com
> www.celestica.com
> ___
> flashrom mailing list -- f
flashrom mailing list -- flashrom@flashrom.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to flashrom-le...@flashrom.org
Best regards,
Angel Pons
___
flashrom mailing list -- flashrom@flashrom.org
To unsubscribe send an email to flashrom-le...@flashrom.org
shrom mailing list -- flashrom@flashrom.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to flashrom-le...@flashrom.org
Best regards,
Angel Pons
___
flashrom mailing list -- flashrom@flashrom.org
To unsubscribe send an email to flashrom-le...@flashrom.org
> flashrom mailing list -- flashrom@flashrom.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to flashrom-le...@flashrom.org
Best regards, and happy hacking!
Angel Pons
___
flashrom mailing list -- flashrom@flashrom.org
To unsubscribe send an email to flashrom-le...@flashrom.org
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 18, 2020 at 7:31 PM Nico Huber wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 14.01.20 17:10, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> > commit e28d75ed7204d7fac2c0fac13978098530b0574e dropped some logic
> > during refactoring.
> > PCI-based programmers now fail to initialize IFF the desired PCI device
> > not
I completely agree.
Nico
>
> [1] https://www.flashrom.org/Development_Guidelines#Sending_a_patch
> ___
> flashrom mailing list -- flashrom@flashrom.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to flashrom-le...@flashrom.org
Best regards,
Angel Pons
___
flashrom mailing list -- flashrom@flashrom.org
To unsubscribe send an email to flashrom-le...@flashrom.org
Checking for FTDI support... found.
> # Checking for FT232H support in libftdi... found.
> # Checking if Linux MTD headers are present... yes.
> # Checking if Linux SPI headers are present... yes.
> # Checking for utsname support... found.
> # Checking for clock_gettime suppor
add force key or warning message with (yes/no) option.
> Default "yes", of course.
>
Adding a "force" optian does not make any sense if flashrom does not know
where to flash the data on the chip. And forcing that by default would be
even worse.
Regards,
Angel Pons
>
___
rds,
Angel Pons
___
flashrom mailing list -- flashrom@flashrom.org
To unsubscribe send an email to flashrom-le...@flashrom.org
t pin is usually active
when low).
Regards,
Angel Pons
>
___
flashrom mailing list -- flashrom@flashrom.org
To unsubscribe send an email to flashrom-le...@flashrom.org
Hello,
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019, 22:36 Frei Bjerkestrand W25Q128.W Winbond Chip
>
If I recall correctly, this is a 1.8V part. Are you powering it with a
higher voltage, by any chance?
Regards,
Angel Pons
>
___
flashrom mailing list -- fl
ut command line switch.
Error accessing ICH RCRB, 0x4000 bytes at 0xfed1c000
> /dev/mem mmap failed: Operation not permitted
>
Your kernel restricts access to /dev/mem. Try using the following kernel
parameter: iomem=relaxed
Best regards,
Angel Pons
>
_
Hello,
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019, 18:26 Richard Hughes On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 at 17:00, Angel Pons wrote:
> > The it85spi driver is commented out in code, apparently because it
> > relies on firmware-specific functions. AFAIK, there isn't much to read
> > the internal flash on ECs,
tion I'd be very
> grateful. Thanks.
I don't think much has been done for the internal flash on these ICs on
flashrom. For instance, I didn't know the IT8987 had an internal flash.
> Richard
Best regards,
Angel Pons
___
flashrom mailing list -- fla
wer Intel platforms lock read and/or write access to some
parts of the flash chip based on what the IFD (Intel Firmware Descriptor,
also known as Intel Flash Descriptor) specifies. flashrom has a parameter
to access one region at a time, however.
Best regards,
Angel P
e. Trying to read them results in an error,
as expected.
If you want to completely backup the chip, either disabling region
protections or using an external programmer is needed.
>
> Thanks
>
> Tom Crane
Best regards,
Angel Pons
___
flashrom mai
Hello,
Is this a log to mark Z97 as tested? Since neither the flash
descriptor nor protected ranges are blocking reads or writes, could
you test read, write and erase as well, please?
Best regards,
Angel Pons Pons
___
flashrom mailing list
flashrom
r to only
change what is not working.
Best regards,
Angel Pons Pons
___
flashrom mailing list
flashrom@flashrom.org
https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom
Hello Michael,
What is your question about this log?
Regards,
Angel Pons Pons
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 9:14 AM, Michael Miller
wrote:
> [root@localhost ~]# flashrom -V --programmer internal
> flashrom v1.0 on Linux 3.10.0-862.11.6.el7.x86_64 (x86_64)
> flashrom is free soft
for
this laptop.
Best regards,
Angel Pons Pons
___
flashrom mailing list
flashrom@flashrom.org
https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom
Hello LWS,
I use a RPi for flashing chips too, and I connect pin 17 (3.3V source for
the RPi) to three pins on DIP-8/SOIC-8 flash chip:
- pin 3, to disable write protection
- pin 7, to enable the chip
- pin 8, to power the chip
As I understand it, it should work.
Best regards,
Angel Pons
45 matches
Mail list logo
