[flashrom] Spansion FL256SAIF00

2018-03-13 Thread Michael Fuckner
Hi, I have an Spansion/ Cypress FL256SAIF00 (http://www.cypress.com/file/177966/download) , I'd like to write to. I added the diff to recognize the chip, but I believe I did something wrong- can you help? Regards, Michael! logs-fl256s.tgz Description: application/compressed-tar ___

Re: [flashrom] Spansion FL256SAIF00

2018-03-13 Thread Nico Huber
Hi Micheal, On 13.03.2018 13:28, Michael Fuckner wrote: > Hi, > > I have an Spansion/ Cypress FL256SAIF00 is that the marking on the chip's package? It doesn't match the ordering information in the datasheet. If the 00 at the end match the zeros in the datasheet, this chip should have 64KiB sect

Re: [flashrom] Spansion FL256SAIF00

2018-03-13 Thread Michael Fuckner
Hi Nico, On 03/13/2018 04:06 PM, Nico Huber wrote: Hi Micheal, You seem to still be on the staging branch. We have moved development to a master branch by now and abandoned staging. You should rebase on master (where some changes regarding 4-byte addressing were merged). OK, does this look b

Re: [flashrom] [PATCH] Fix compilation with older MinGW versions

2018-03-13 Thread Antonio Ospite
On Sat, 3 Mar 2018 19:07:15 +0100 Antonio Ospite wrote: > The __MINGW_PRINTF_FORMAT constant has been defined back in 2012 > https://sourceforge.net/p/mingw-w64/mingw-w64/ci/77bc5d6103b5fb9f59fbddab1583e69549913312/ > > However older toolchains are still around and some user reported the > foll

Re: [flashrom] Spansion FL256SAIF00

2018-03-13 Thread Nico Huber
You seem to still be on the staging branch. We have moved development to a master branch by now and abandoned staging. You should rebase on master (where some changes regarding 4-byte addressing were merged). OK, does this look better: flashrom p1.0-22-g0bfa819 on Linux 4.14.24-v7+ (armv7l)? No