On Tue, 26 May 2020 at 03:27, Jonathan A. Kollasch
wrote:
> Remove meson support.
Removing meson support from flashrom would mean dropping the fwupd
plugin that uses libflashrom; we have to build flashrom from a
subproject as very often we're depending the very latest API
additions.
> Meson is
On Tue, 26 May 2020 at 00:20, Angel Pons wrote:
> So, given that meson produces broken executables and nobody seems to
> be actively taking care of it
Errr, I am taking care of it. Is it broken now?
Richard.
___
flashrom mailing list --
Hi Richard, Jonathan, and everyone else,
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 12:00 PM Richard Hughes wrote:
>
> On Tue, 26 May 2020 at 00:20, Angel Pons wrote:
> > So, given that meson produces broken executables and nobody seems to
> > be actively taking care of it
>
> Errr, I am taking care of it. Is it
On Tue, 26 May 2020 at 16:03, Angel Pons wrote:
> Well, as I stated previously, flashrom built with meson results in the
> `-o` option not working at all. When helping others via IRC, we
> recommend fetching flashrom logs using that option so that no messages
> get lost, so not being able to rely
On Tue, 26 May 2020 19:20:47 +0100
Richard Hughes wrote:
> Have you tried to build flashrom on Debian or Fedora using the
> built-in makefiles? They're fine for building the software locally on
> x86, but not much more.
The makefile is able to build flashrom on about any operating system
there
> Well, as I stated previously, flashrom built with meson results in the
> `-o` option not working at all. When helping others via IRC, we
> recommend fetching flashrom logs using that option so that no messages
> get lost, so not being able to rely on it is rather inconvenient.
Ouch... Yeah,
