Re: [Flent-users] irtt packet-cluster mode for estimating queueing delay

2018-05-06 Thread Pete Heist
> On May 6, 2018, at 10:51 PM, Pete Heist wrote: >> >> Ah, so this is a wired connection? And you are only targeting a >> particular setup? > > The backhaul is a mixture of wired and wireless links, each with an ALIX or > APU router. A 5 GHz wireless node might contain: > >

[Flent-users] [tohojo/flent] Will IperfCsvRunner UDP result calculate in flent-gui? (#136)

2018-05-06 Thread Louie Lu
For what I saw is, it will not store the `MEAN_VALUE` when the runner finish. But the `raw_value` were recorded. Why will not gui calculate the mean value when loading the plot? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on

Re: [Flent-users] irtt packet-cluster mode for estimating queueing delay

2018-05-06 Thread Pete Heist
> On May 6, 2018, at 9:27 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: >> >> The backhaul I’d like to test it on uses mostly NSM5s as the wireless >> devices and APUs for routing, QoS, etc. The QoS scripts use the htb, >> sfq and prio qdiscs. I’m hoping I can just add a prio qdisc / tc >>

Re: [Flent-users] irtt packet-cluster mode for estimating queueing delay

2018-05-06 Thread Sebastian Moeller
> On May 6, 2018, at 21:32, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: > > Sebastian Moeller writes: >>> [...] >>> Yeah, ICMP is definitely treated differently in many places... Another >>> example is routers and switches that have a data plane implemented in >>> hardware

Re: [Flent-users] irtt packet-cluster mode for estimating queueing delay

2018-05-06 Thread Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Sebastian Moeller writes: >> On May 6, 2018, at 21:27, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: >> >> Pete Heist writes: >> On May 6, 2018, at 5:54 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: Pete Heist writes:

Re: [Flent-users] irtt packet-cluster mode for estimating queueing delay

2018-05-06 Thread Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Pete Heist writes: >> On May 6, 2018, at 5:54 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: >> >> Pete Heist writes: >> >>> Channel contention delay may be estimated by the difference between >>> the round-trip times for the strict priority VO and BE

Re: [Flent-users] irtt packet-cluster mode for estimating queueing delay

2018-05-06 Thread Sebastian Moeller
Hi Pete, you could also try different packet sizes for you probes. The size ratio should give you an idea about the RTT difference explained by simple transit times and anything on top of that might be related to queueing. I am probably severely underestimating the scope of your question, but

Re: [Flent-users] irtt packet-cluster mode for estimating queueing delay

2018-05-06 Thread Pete Heist
> On May 6, 2018, at 5:54 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: > > Pete Heist writes: > >> Channel contention delay may be estimated by the difference between >> the round-trip times for the strict priority VO and BE packets (0x01 >> and 0xb9), and queueing delay

Re: [Flent-users] irtt packet-cluster mode for estimating queueing delay

2018-05-06 Thread Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Pete Heist writes: > I’d like to add the ability for https://github.com/peteheist/irtt > to send N request packets > per-interval, and to optionally vary, at a minimum, the dscp value. > I’d then like to try to use this to try to estimate