A thought on cross-browser hell…
If every web developer in the world today decided to drop support for IE,
everyone would go get Chrome or Firefox.
This would be a win-win, as they would get a better browser, and we would get a
better development environment.
Who's with me?
Guy
On
Time they remade Fantasy Island, I think.
They could start with a ship arriving for the Flex Alternatives conference.
Tattoo could feed the SilverLight impostor to the sharks.
LOL
On 16/01/2012 12:23, Guy Morton wrote:
A thought on cross-browser hell…
If every web developer in the world
Good luck on convincing IT departments in large corporations who are generally
Microsoft shops.
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Guy Morton guy@... wrote:
A thought on cross-browser hell
If every web developer in the world today decided to drop support for IE,
everyone would go get
All of that seems inordinately complex compared to just coding in ActionScript.
I still believe there is a future with Flex (I am planning for 3-5 years).
Adobe is still developing Flash for the desktop.
Flex is just an ActionScript Framework (Or library if you like to think of it
that way) of
It is not just that...
I remember in the 90's there was IE and Netscape... then came Opera... and
then Gekko/Firefox replaced Netscape... now, there is Chrome.
There are so many browsers, because each one of then thinks that he is the
best for some kind of need of the user.
that means: each one
I'm still trying to learn solid skinning practices and looking for a
recommendation. I need to skin a component based on our UXD design. I can do
half of what I need in CSS ,but then I need to actually copy the spark skin and
modify it for the remain part. My question is, since I'm already
Hi
I have been working with Flex and related technologies for last 7 -10 yrs.
Recently, in my project I came across this technology
http://eclipse.org/rap/
and it converts all your SWT Java components into Qooxdoo Javascript which
finally runs on the browser. But here everything is Java.
From what I've seen, in Zkoss there's a strong coupling between the server and
the client. I might be wrong, but when I tested the demos it looked to me that
any user interaction (ex: clicking on a button) ends up in a call to the
server. I'm not a big fan of this approach...
I think you might
Hi Joaoak:
You can make the coupling as tight or loose as you want. Each UI object can
have a client side widget that is primarily the appearance, and a server side
component that should contain the more complex logic. So, you can hide as much
as want by placing it in the server side component
The problem with that approach is a lot of people are behind corporate
firewalls where they also do not have local admin rights and are therefore not
allowed to install anything on their desktop. If they want it, they have to
call the network guys and get authorization and then have them
10 matches
Mail list logo
