to say is it's Microsoft, if they kill anything it's
not
> on
> > the merits of their product... it's brute force. This is not a
> threat
> > to Flash/Flex by any means. Microsoft will never be able to
create a
> > truly cross platform product. All of their past efforts have
been
> > clumsy at best, even on their own platform.
> >
> > Paul
> >
>
--
Ralph Hauwert
ments). I'd guess that Silverlight will get some video market
> share, but it has a long way to go to enter the RIA market. My 2
> centavos.
>
> Cheers,
> Claus.
>
> --
> claus wahlers
> cĂ´deazur brasil
> http://codeazur.com.br/
> http://wahlers.com.br/claus/blog/
>
--
Regards,
Scott Barnes
http://www.mossyblog.com
--
Ralph Hauwert
?
--
Ralph Hauwert
the online
docs and can't find it. Maybe it has been removed with 2.01?
Cheers,
Ralf.
On 2/4/07, Ralph Hauwert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I just spent about an hour trying to figure out why one of my methods
> was not executing.
> After a while I fig
ently at runtime amazed me.
What's this all about ?
--
Ralph Hauwert
ce
To this:
import mx.effects.IEffectInstance
Cheers!
Brian
--
Ralph Hauwert
FlashCoder
ebugging?
Thanks,
Jun
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com , "Ralph
Hauwert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> removeChildAt() will only remove the specified object from the
displaylist,
> it won't destroy the object. Flex, by design keeps references to
objects in
> containe
ad and test the framework and provide us your
feedback.
--
Ralph Hauwert
FlashCoder
procedure to
notify the clients that they must refresh their ArrayCollection,
stored at the Model Locator
How do you take care of this refresh
Thanks in advance.
--
Ralph Hauwert
FlashCoder
Stack.removeChildAndAllReferences() :)
Bjorn
On 24/11/2006, at 6:32 AM, Ralph Hauwert wrote:
removeChildAt() will only remove the specified object from the
displaylist, it won't destroy the object. Flex, by design keeps references
to objects in containers. You'll have to remove all re
rote:
> On Thursday 23 November 2006 01:02, Ralph Hauwert wrote:
> > just behind subclipse. (Which still doesn't seem to support the latest
> > subversion).
>
> Get their beta (I think the Eclipse update URL is
> http://subclipse.tigris.org/update_1.2.x).
> We
time a proceed through each stack my debugger variables say;
c1 = "childs.MyPanel"
c2 = "childs.MyBox"
c3 = "childs.MyCanvas"
shouldn't it be
c1 = null
c2 = null
c3 = "childs.MyCanvas"
Also i am tracking totalMemory usage and i am receiving no benefits
compared to when i was not using removeChild()
Thanks,
Bjorn
--
Ralph Hauwert
FlashCoder
Are you looking for a gesture/input check (input form validation) or a
system ip adress check ?
On 11/23/06, KP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can we do the same as mentioned in the subject line.
Thanks
Kumar
--
Ralph Hauwert
FlashCoder
n).
"To many options..."
But I'll probably check this out.
Ralph.
On 11/23/06, Oliver Lietz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 23. November 2006 02:02 schrieb Ralph Hauwert:
> > Hi Mike,
> >
> > clear! I've been having more 3.2 compatibility proble
e it there; this can't work, since we
can't touch the titleIconObject from a subclass.
Any suggestions ?
--
Ralph Hauwert
FlashCoder
--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40ya
15 matches
Mail list logo