On Thursday 08 Mar 2007, Alex Harui wrote:
You can bind, I'm just not sure if the module will unload if you want to
kick it out of memory later.
Ok, not bothered about that as we'll mainly use Modules to bring the initial
download size down by excluding areas most people wont use (admin
@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Roger Gonzalez
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 4:07 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Modules at 360Flex conference
There are basically three solutions right now.
Brute force hammer solutions:
1) Embed the font everywhere
On Thursday 08 Mar 2007, Alex Harui wrote:
I agree that the ModuleLoader kills your ability to use binding, but
Could you elaborate here ?
I guess I can't bind across Modules, but it must be ok within a given Module,
no ?
--
Tom Chiverton
Helping to competently create attention-grabbing
But you can always define the Bindable variable(s) in a Singleton
class (ModelLocator in Cairngorm terms)
and define the binding with respect to these variables.
With this approach you can even define bindings across modules.
On Mar 8, 2007, at 3:19 PM, Tom Chiverton wrote:
On Thursday 08
On Thursday 08 Mar 2007, Bhuvan Gupta wrote:
But you can always define the Bindable variable(s) in a Singleton
class (ModelLocator in Cairngorm terms)
and define the binding with respect to these variables.
The same solution that is suggested for DragManager, basically then ?
I'd love to know
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Modules at 360Flex conference
On Thursday 08 Mar 2007, Bhuvan Gupta wrote:
But you can always define the Bindable variable(s) in a Singleton
class (ModelLocator in Cairngorm terms)
and define the binding with respect to these variables
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Modules at 360Flex conference
Shaun,
Smaller Swf output file sizes,
Module support within the mx framework,
Module support within Cairngorm,
Issues with Viewstacks and Binding,
Embedding Fonts
] Modules at 360Flex conference
Shaun,
Smaller Swf output file sizes,
Module support within the mx framework,
Module support within Cairngorm,
Issues with Viewstacks and Binding,
Embedding Fonts,
I think there are a couple more as well.
Bjorn
On 08/03/2007, at 1:11 PM, shaun wrote:
Bjorn
*To:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
*Subject:* Re: [flexcoders] Modules at 360Flex conference
Shaun,
Smaller Swf output file sizes,
Module support within the mx framework,
Module support within Cairngorm,
Issues with Viewstacks and Binding,
Embedding Fonts,
I think
Sent: den 8 mars 2007 17:13
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Modules at 360Flex conference
RG,
1 2 3 are both linked.
200 kb for a shell plus another 600 kb for RSL's in the initial download is
too nasty.
What i need is modularization of the framework so
, March 08, 2007 3:54 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Modules at 360Flex conference
Regarding the embedded font issue:
We have following solution which seems to work well. It's also a
similar solution
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 4:07 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Modules at 360Flex conference
There are basically three solutions right now.
Brute force hammer solutions:
1) Embed the font everywhere in all SWFs, so that there is never any
confusion about
We've seen lots of questions on modules recently. I just presented on
Modules at the 360Flex conference where I tried to answer some of these
questions. Slides and examples are at http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
Hey Alex,
After your experience with modules do you believe it was the correct
decision to include it in 2.01 as opposed to waiting for 3.0?
Over here we just refactored away from modules to the monolithic ria
because of outstanding issues..
regards,
Bjorn
On 08/03/2007, at 12:23 PM,
Bjorn Schultheiss wrote:
Hey Alex,
After your experience with modules do you believe it was the correct
decision to include it in 2.01 as opposed to waiting for 3.0?
Over here we just refactored away from modules to the monolithic ria
because of outstanding issues..
What are the
Shaun,
Smaller Swf output file sizes,
Module support within the mx framework,
Module support within Cairngorm,
Issues with Viewstacks and Binding,
Embedding Fonts,
I think there are a couple more as well.
Bjorn
On 08/03/2007, at 1:11 PM, shaun wrote:
Bjorn Schultheiss wrote:
Hey Alex,
Thanks for posting the slides.
Great talk at 360 BTW.
- superabe
On 3/7/07, alex_harui [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We've seen lots of questions on modules recently. I just presented on
Modules at the 360Flex conference where I tried to answer some of these
questions. Slides and examples are at
steps on a cross-versioning strategy.
-Alex
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bjorn Schultheiss
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 5:38 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Modules at 360Flex
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bjorn Schultheiss
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 7:00 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Modules at 360Flex conference
Shaun,
Smaller Swf output file sizes,
Module support within the mx framework,
Module support within
@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Modules at 360Flex conference
Shaun,
Smaller Swf output file sizes,
Module support within the mx framework,
Module support within Cairngorm,
Issues with Viewstacks and Binding,
Embedding Fonts,
I think there are a couple more as well.
Bjorn
20 matches
Mail list logo
