: [flexcoders] Re: DB access in Apollo
SharedObject.
You mean those little tiny 128k or whatever Shared Objects like from the
Flash player or do you mean Apollo will have a more robust larger
Shared Object?
Jason Merrill
Bank of America
Global Technology Operations
Learning Leadership
dorkie,
dorkie dork from dorktown wrote:
btw, the way this thing works is by feature request (voting system). at
least at the company i work for. so if you aren't asking for it ask for it
now.
http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/mmform/index.cfm?name=wishform
On 3/9/07, dorkie dork from
Wow Shaun,
Lots of stuff to vehemently disagree with.
Your overstating the importance of a db on the client.
Well, he may be. But let me just say this. For the last 20 years, most
desktop apps have use a client side database. Generally in the MS
world it used to be a library called Jet that
: Re: [flexcoders] Re: DB access in Apollo
I think that if Adobe really wants to bill Apollo as taking the best-of web
technology and putting it on the desktop, then they need to seriously
consider including a DB that speaks SQL.
Personally, I think it would be *fantastic* if Apollo was essentially
I don't it should be that difficult to built database connectivity
like zinc uses.
That way it can communicate with stand alone dbs like ms access,
etc...
But then you have to deal with setting up installing that database on
the user end. If it was built in to Apollo, it would be much easier.
i agree. it should be built in. at some point the Apollo team realized they
needed to include built in support for HTML container and support css, etc.
and not rely on outside technology being there. thats its strong point in
that if it is built in we don't have to worry about installing
: [flexcoders] Re: DB access in Apollo
btw, the way this thing works is by feature request (voting system). at least
at the company i work for. so if you aren't asking for it ask for it now.
http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/mmform/index.cfm?name=wishform
http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/mmform/index.cfm
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la
part de Samuel R. Neff
Envoyé : jeudi 8 mars 2007 15:38
À : flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Objet : RE: [flexcoders] Re: DB access in Apollo
my hosting company supports sqlite. no mention of it.
Actually SQLite is included as standard in PHP5 already.
How much data could Apollo store locally when offline? I think this is
where some of the concern lies around not having an integrated database
availble in Apollo. Does anyone know? Shared objects at least in Flash
player 9 are pretty limited in size. Does Apollo plan to store data
locally in a
This should be on the TOP priority how I'm suppose to make my app
offline without a DB?
This is not a should have.. its a must have.
sqlite_count+=1;
xD
--
. m a r c o sa u g u s t o ;
.eu vim para confundir e não para explicar!. . . - Chacrinha
On Friday 09 Mar 2007, . m a r c o s a u g u s t o wrote:
This should be on the TOP priority how I'm suppose to make my app
offline without a DB?
SharedObject.
--
Tom Chiverton
Helping to administratively revolutionize compelling design-patterns
On: http://thefalken.livejournal.com
SharedObject.
You mean those little tiny 128k or whatever Shared Objects like from the
Flash player or do you mean Apollo will have a more robust larger
Shared Object?
Jason Merrill
Bank of America
Global Technology Operations
Learning Leadership Development
eTools Multimedia Team
AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Re: DB access in Apollo
SharedObject.
You mean those little tiny 128k or whatever Shared Objects like from the
Flash player or do you mean Apollo will have a more robust larger
Shared Object?
Jason Merrill
Bank of America
Global
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la
part de Merrill, Jason
Envoyé : vendredi 9 mars 2007 17:54
À : flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Objet : RE: [flexcoders] Re: DB access in Apollo
SharedObject.
You mean those little tiny 128k or whatever Shared Objects like from the
Flash player or do you mean Apollo
If you are storing data with the File API, then there is no limit.
mike chambers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Merrill, Jason wrote:
How much data could Apollo store locally when offline? I think this is
where some of the concern lies around not having an integrated database
availble in Apollo.
Shared Objects. File API.
mike chambers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
. m a r c o s a u g u s t o wrote:
This should be on the TOP priority how I'm suppose to make my app
offline without a DB?
This is not a should have.. its a must have.
sqlite_count+=1;
xD
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Re: DB access in Apollo
Shared Objects. File API.
mike chambers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:mesh%40adobe.com
. m a r c o s a u g u s t o wrote
@yahoogroups.com
*Subject:* RE: [flexcoders] Re: DB access in Apollo
SharedObject.
You mean those little tiny 128k or whatever Shared Objects like from the
Flash player or do you mean Apollo will have a more robust larger
Shared Object?
Jason Merrill
Bank of America
Global Technology Operations
: [flexcoders] Re: DB access in Apollo
SharedObject.
You mean those little tiny 128k or whatever Shared Objects like from the
Flash player or do you mean Apollo will have a more robust larger
Shared Object?
Jason Merrill
Bank of America
Global Technology Operations
Learning Leadership
Learning Leadership Development
eTools Multimedia Team
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Chambers
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 12:36 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Re: DB access in Apollo
Shared Objects. File API.
mike
On Thursday 08 Mar 2007, dorkie dork from dorktown wrote:
mysql is familiar and it is on nearly every online hosting company. if you
want to port your app from desktop to online you don't have to rewrite your
sql statements / queries.
You should either be writing proper portable SQL, or using
my hosting company supports sqlite. no mention of it.
Actually SQLite is included as standard in PHP5 already.
I'm working on Flex app that would be great for Apollo but it too
requires DB access and I don't see how the app would ever work unless
Apollo includes an integrated DB (I vote for MySQL too).
I think that Apollo would generate a lot more interest if an
integrated DB was included sooner rather
.
:)
-David
Apollo
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rich Tretola
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 9:03 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] DB access in Apollo
This is what I am hoping for.
Rich
I was looking for something more along the lines of: MySQL supports
this particular SQL dialect, or has this feature which make development
so much easier, etc...
+1 sqlite for me as well. An embedded SQL database would add tremendous
value in the B2B custom app realm where I live.
-Andy
I think it really depends on the application. I don't think there is
any 1 database that could cover even 10% of the use cases. If they do
bundle a database it would have to be something small and easily
replaceable, because everyone will want to replace it, no matter what
it is.
Pd
--- In
On 3/7/07, Paul DeCoursey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it really depends on the application. I don't think there is
any 1 database that could cover even 10% of the use cases.
really? Not even 10% eh. So in the server market, MySQL, Oracle, MsSQL
dont cover the majority of use cases with
mysql is familiar and it is on nearly every online hosting company. if you
want to port your app from desktop to online you don't have to rewrite your
sql statements / queries. just point to the online db. so portability. i
dont want to learn another db. i know phpmyadmin and mysql. i dont know
, March 02, 2007 7:00 AM
*To:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
*Subject:* RE: [flexcoders] DB access in Apollo
Don't forget that Apollo will let us use our own installers
There's no
reason you couldn't install your own database in addition to the
Apollo
application.
Shan
*From
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Impudent1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Russell Sprague wrote:
I vote for MySQL.
Agreed
Impudent1
LeapFrog Productions
Are there specific reasons why you want or need MySQL?
Having a stand-alone environment that can connect to a database is handy
for lots of kinds of applications.
If we're having a wish list here, how about the ability to use jdbc
drivers and include some local db + drivers, maybe derby or sqllite.
Maybe I'm having flashbacks (pardon the pun) to my
familiarity for me, my vote as well. and if i need to ever take my db online
i can point to mysql online db.
On 3/6/07, jason_williams_mm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Impudent1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Russell Sprague wrote:
I vote for MySQL.
Agreed
33 matches
Mail list logo
