Please VOTE for SDK-16016
(https://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-16016), in addition to
SDK-16897 (https://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-16897), if you want
tab key support to be fixed, including usage in item renderers.
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of aceoohay
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 6:04 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Flex Enhancement, TabIndex
Alex:
How does this work against accessibility rules?
First, I am suggesting
on your bugs being fixed, but I've been wrong
before.
-Alex
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of aceoohay
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 7:13 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Flex Enhancement, TabIndex
Alex:
While I have never
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of aceoohay
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 7:13 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Flex Enhancement, TabIndex
Alex:
While I have never worked in a large environment such as the one
you
are in, I believe I understand the issues. I
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Flex Enhancement, TabIndex
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 22:59:07 -
Alex:
I've got one vote from Jim Abbott on the bug.
How many do I need before it makes a difference?
Paul
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Alex Harui [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
, 2008 4:17 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Re: Flex Enhancement, TabIndex
Out of curiosity, I checked JIRA and there are only six issues with 100+
votes, so if you've got a lot of friends, you should be able to get in
the Top 10 Most Popular Bugs fairly easily
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Maciek Sakrejda
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 4:17 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Re: Flex Enhancement, TabIndex
Out of curiosity, I checked JIRA and there are only six issues with
100+
votes, so if you've got a lot of friends, you
Alex:
I am not sure precisely how to do what you are suggesting.
What I currently do is to create modules for each panel, and use
moduleloader to add them to the stage. Are you suggesting that
instead I use PopUpManager instead of moduleLoader?
For my existing application it seems like a lot
. There'll probably be some other stuff that needs to be fixed up,
but that's what I'd try first.
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of aceoohay
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 12:13 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Flex Enhancement
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of aceoohay
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 12:13 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Flex Enhancement, TabIndex
Alex:
I am not sure precisely how to do what you are suggesting.
What I currently do is to create modules for each panel, and use
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Flex Enhancement, TabIndex
Alex:
I am not sure precisely how to do what you are suggesting.
What I currently do is to create modules for each panel, and use
moduleloader to add them to the stage. Are you suggesting that
instead I use PopUpManager instead
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Flex Enhancement, TabIndex
Alex:
I am not sure precisely how to do what you are suggesting.
What I currently do is to create modules for each panel, and use
moduleloader to add them to the stage. Are you suggesting
] On Behalf Of aceoohay
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 12:13 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Flex Enhancement, TabIndex
Alex:
I am not sure precisely how to do what you are suggesting.
What I currently do is to create modules for each
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Flex Enhancement, TabIndex
Alex:
I am not sure precisely how to do what you are suggesting.
What I currently do is to create modules for each panel,
and use
moduleloader to add them to the stage. Are you suggesting
: [flexcoders] Re: Flex Enhancement, TabIndex
Alex:
How does this work against accessibility rules?
First, I am suggesting something that enhances flexibility while
leaving the default behavior alone. Second, the current default
behavior irrespective of accessibility rules is counter intuitive
15 matches
Mail list logo
