[flexcoders] Re: Flex and Server-Side Technology Recommendations

2006-07-18 Thread Tom Jordahl
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Nick Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So Tom, when are you going to include newer MySQL drivers by default, > instead of requiring users to manually update the drivers and specify them > when creating a DSN? I'm using MySQL 4.1 and even that old of a versi

[flexcoders] Re: Flex and Server-Side Technology Recommendations

2006-07-17 Thread Tim Hoff
. Each technology has its advantages, disadvantages, and price tags. > > -Andy > > > > > From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Tim Hoff > Sent: Mon 7/17/2006 5:59 PM > To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Flex and Server-Side Te

Re: [flexcoders] Re: Flex and Server-Side Technology Recommendations

2006-07-17 Thread Nick Collins
So Tom, when are you going to include newer MySQL drivers by default, instead of requiring users to manually update the drivers and specify them when creating a DSN? I'm using MySQL 4.1 and even that old of a version of MySQL requires me to manually update the drivers on a new CF install and man

[flexcoders] Re: Flex and Server-Side Technology Recommendations

2006-07-17 Thread Tom Jordahl
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Tim Hoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So CF would replace ASP.Net as the middle tier. I have no exposure > to CF, so that clears things up a bit. But, no native databases in > CF? Well, ColdFusion talks to databases using JDBC, the Java equivalent of ODBC

RE: [flexcoders] Re: Flex and Server-Side Technology Recommendations

2006-07-17 Thread Andrew Trice
u can use it to power a flex interface.  Each technology has its advantages, disadvantages, and price tags.   -Andy   From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Tim HoffSent: Mon 7/17/2006 5:59 PMTo: flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSubject: [flexcoders] Re: Flex and Server-Side Technology

Re: [flexcoders] Re: Flex and Server-Side Technology Recommendations

2006-07-17 Thread Marcelo de Moraes Serpa
_ > > From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com ] On > Behalf Of Tim Hoff > Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 5:09 PM > To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Flex and Server-Side Technology > Recommendations > > >

Re: [flexcoders] Re: Flex and Server-Side Technology Recommendations

2006-07-17 Thread Marcelo de Moraes Serpa
Blog: http://www.cynergysystems.com/blogs/page/andrewtrice > > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Office: 866-CYNERGY > > > > > > From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com] On > Behalf Of Tim Hoff > Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 5:09 PM >

[flexcoders] Re: Flex and Server-Side Technology Recommendations

2006-07-17 Thread Tim Hoff
ps.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Tim Hoff > Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 5:09 PM > To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Flex and Server-Side Technology > Recommendations > > > > Hi Tom, > > Thanks for the info. This is

RE: [flexcoders] Re: Flex and Server-Side Technology Recommendations

2006-07-17 Thread Andrew Trice
://www.cynergysystems.com/blogs/page/andrewtrice Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: 866-CYNERGY    From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Tim Hoff Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 5:09 PM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Flex and

[flexcoders] Re: Flex and Server-Side Technology Recommendations

2006-07-17 Thread Tim Hoff
Hi Tom, Thanks for the info. This is more of a CF question, but the CF-Flex connection should afford a little bit of room here. Does CF support what is called, "distributed partitioned views" like SQL Server? This allows you to create several small databases with the same structure that can

[flexcoders] Re: Flex and Server-Side Technology Recommendations

2006-07-17 Thread Tom Jordahl
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Kevin Mulvihill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > What do you all recommend for backend server-side technology to work with > Flex? I'm planning on some work with MySQL and not particularly interested > in .NET. Hi Kevin, I would say that you should