ch 28, 2006 11:30 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Using mxml without flex framework (Flex 2 Beta
1 and 2)
Yes and if i would actually buy Flex Builder, i really would like to
use the tool to my own needs. When making up the architecture of my
app, i want to be ab
Yes and if i would actually buy Flex Builder, i really would like to
use the tool to my own needs. When making up the architecture of my
app, i want to be able to decide
a - if i want to use the flex framework
b - if i want to use mxml or if i just want to make an actionscript
project
And i w
in the context of the current topic i still don't get what you mean. paying for an ide is not a problem, its to be expected.
about the topic at hand: it would have been nice if i could have used mxml to layout any type of app.
--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group
Of Cource Flex framework and compiler is free.. but not everything
On 3/29/06, Johannes Nel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
since flex is free(of cost) i wonder what you mean byt this.
On 3/28/06, Jignesh Dodiya <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
lol. .Obvious Ad
since flex is free(of cost) i wonder what you mean byt this.On 3/28/06, Jignesh Dodiya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
lol. .Obvious Adobe is not do development to serve people for freeof cost..
On 3/28/06, Matt Chotin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> FYI I checked and we're not planning on suppor
lol. .Obvious Adobe is not do development to serve people for free
of cost..
On 3/28/06, Matt Chotin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FYI I checked and we're not planning on supporting MXML apps that don't
> use the framework for version 2.0. However we will investigate to see
> if the case l
6 matches
Mail list logo
