yeah thanks it was helpfull :)
On 10/11/06, EECOLOR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
Its not that the concept of the for..in loop has changed (i think), but the way classes are defined internally has changed.
Properties and methods of classes that are defined inside the class definiti
oups.com [mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of EECOLOR
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006
1:29 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] var in Loop
Hello,
Its not that the concept of the for..in loop has changed (i think), but
the way classes are
Hello,
Its not that the concept of the for..in loop has changed (i think), but the way classes are defined internally has changed.
Properties and methods of classes that are defined inside the class definition will not change at runtime. This is (i think) why they are stored in a different p
at describes the type (hmm, probably the reason whythey named it that way)Dirk.> -Original Message-> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com] On Behalf Of flexlearner> Sent: Monday, October 09, 2006 12:54 PM> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com> Subject: [fle
, probably the reason why
they named it that way)
Dirk.
> -Original Message-
> From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of flexlearner
> Sent: Monday, October 09, 2006 12:54 PM
> To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [flexcoders] var in Loop
&
hello all,
I have a action script class which is bindable and instantiates
objects of other class
as :
--
--
[Bindable]
public class Templateobjects
{
public var template1 = new sampleTemplate1();
public var template
hello all,I have a action script class which is bindable and instantiates objects of other classas :
quote:
[Bindable]public class Templateobjects{public var template1 = new sampleTemplate1();public var template2 = new sampleTemplate2();public function Templateobjects(){// constructor function
7 matches
Mail list logo