RE: [flexcoders] ActionScript Components

2005-04-22 Thread Stephen Gilson
@yahoogroups.comSubject: RE: [flexcoders] ActionScript Components Well, flex is whining about subclassing mxml components wich have children with other mxml components containing children: The component mx.controls.Button may not be used as a child of erik.extend.panel because the erik.extend.panel

RE: [flexcoders] ActionScript Components

2005-04-07 Thread Gordon Smith
flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSubject: Re: [flexcoders] ActionScript Components Wow, that's a great article. It seems that custom components in ActionScript can get quite complex. Is it really the recommended way to create custom components if you can? Creating them as mxml + as files has b

RE: [flexcoders] ActionScript Components

2005-04-07 Thread Erik Westra
: 'flexcoders@yahoogroups.com'Subject: RE: [flexcoders] ActionScript Components It is essentially a matter of preference. There are no performance differences that I know of. I generally recommend creatingcomponents in MXML because it makes several things easier, such as creating internal

RE: [flexcoders] ActionScript Components

2005-04-07 Thread Jose Lora
@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [flexcoders] ActionScript Components A good reason to make pure actionscript components is that they can be subclassed. When u create an mxml component, u cant extends a custom mxml component wich has children. Greetz Erik From: Gordon Smith [mailto

RE: [flexcoders] ActionScript Components

2005-04-07 Thread Erik Westra
From: JesterXL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: donderdag 7 april 2005 16:48To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSubject: Re: [flexcoders] ActionScript Components Can you be more specific? I don't have any problems sub-classes my MXML components. - Original Message - From: Erik Westra To: fl

Re: [flexcoders] ActionScript Components

2005-04-07 Thread JesterXL
w" //panel Greetz Erik From: JesterXL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: donderdag 7 april 2005 16:48To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSubject: Re: [flexcoders] ActionScript Components Can you be more specific? I don't have any problems sub-classes my MXML components. - Original Messa

RE: [flexcoders] ActionScript Components

2005-04-07 Thread Erik Westra
kage.*"/com.package:panel Greetz Erik From: JesterXL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: donderdag 7 april 2005 17:16To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSubject: Re: [flexcoders] ActionScript Components That doesn't look like the correct way to do a namespace; I'm still learning the freedom of syntax

Re: [flexcoders] ActionScript Components

2005-04-07 Thread Matthew Shirey
xmlns:com.package=com.package.*/com.package:panel Greetz Erik From: JesterXL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: donderdag 7 april 2005 17:16 To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSubject: Re: [flexcoders] ActionScript Components That doesn't look like the correct way to do a namespace; I'm still learning

RE: [flexcoders] ActionScript Components

2005-04-06 Thread Stephen Gilson
There are articles on the Macromedia web site that you can use: Creating Advanced Components: http://www.macromedia.com/support/documentation/en/flex/1_5/createcomponents/index.html Flex Component Basics -two part article Part 1: