: RE: [flexcoders] Profiler telling lies?
Hmm, not sure I understood everything you're doing. What is the same
action another two times?
When you say the line with the instance being the viewstack object, if
that is a loitering object and [child0] is the backreference, then that
should
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Profiler telling lies?
Yeah, ok some clarification (rather than bashing the email out then going home
for the night ;) )
I'm debugging and watching the numChildren properties and the selectedChild
properties. (The object extends viewstack btw
Doberenz
Sent: 05 May 2009 16:04
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Cc: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Profiler telling lies?
Check your event listeners because if you're not using weak references
then the garbage collector won't remove it. Disregard if you already
knew
: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:flexcod...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Alex Harui
Sent: 05 May 2009 17:57
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Profiler telling lies?
First, make sure you are using the right view. If you are looking at
loitering objects but your scenario
Check your event listeners because if you're not using weak references
then the garbage collector won't remove it. Disregard if you already
knew that one :)
On May 5, 2009, at 7:58 AM, Gregor Kiddie gkid...@inpses.co.uk
wrote:
Hi all,
I’m trying to work out where a memory leak is
@yahoogroups.com [mailto:flexcod...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Mark Doberenz
Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 8:04 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Cc: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Profiler telling lies?
Check your event listeners because if you're not using weak references
6 matches
Mail list logo
