On Monday 31 July 2006 16:07, ddanone2 wrote:
Tom, i dont believe what i'm reading!!!
Maybe you work for free???
Nope, but...
BTW, I would like to know how many people has purchased Flex, i'm one
of them.
(So is my employer, for the record. Since Flex 1.)
. we're a Linux-based development
On Friday 28 July 2006 16:50, hank williams wrote:
Sure there's a good reason. They are human beings and not for lack of
trying they couldnt get it done yet because there are significant
differences/issues between mac windows in the eclipse environment.
I didn't think there were many,
On Friday 28 July 2006 23:34, Adam Reynolds wrote:
It's your life. You are more than welcome to choose how you difficult
you want to make it for yourself...
shrug
FB is hundreds of pounds.
Eclipse is free, as is a few minutes here and there to fix-up the schema when
it throws one to many red
On Friday 28 July 2006 18:00, hank williams wrote:
tomcat on the mac side and fb2 and firefox in the pc partition. But I am
not clear how networking works between the two virtual environments.
I understand you either create a private network with only the guest and host
on, or give the guest
On Friday 28 July 2006 16:23, Adam Reynolds wrote:
You need to give yourself an hourly rate and then ask yourself how much
money the IDE will save you. The effort involved in not using the IDE
could end up costing you more in the long run.
Using the IDE would be an exercise in making my
On 7/31/06, Tom Chiverton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 28 July 2006 16:50, hank williams wrote:
Sure there's a good reason. They are human beings and not for lack of
trying they couldnt get it done yet because there are significant
differences/issues between mac windows in the
On Monday 31 July 2006 11:27, hank williams wrote:
is no good reason seems to suggest that they are either incompetent
or dishonest, and I dont think that, at least in this case, that
either assumption is warranted.
no good reason is a phrase I use when there is no good technological reason
On 7/31/06, Tom Chiverton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 31 July 2006 11:27, hank williams wrote:
is no good reason seems to suggest that they are either incompetent
or dishonest, and I dont think that, at least in this case, that
either assumption is warranted.
no good reason is a
On Monday 31 July 2006 12:09, hank williams wrote:
with something as sophisticated as Flex Builder.
Maybe I have a lower thought on how sophisticated it is :-)
--
Tom Chiverton
This email is sent for and on behalf of Halliwells LLP.
lol. :)
On 7/31/06, Tom Chiverton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 31 July 2006 12:09, hank williams wrote:
with something as sophisticated as Flex Builder.
Maybe I have a lower thought on how sophisticated it is :-)
--
Tom Chiverton
BTW, I would like to know how many people has purchased Flex, i'm one
of them.
As of 7:34pst exactly 10,956 copies.
Just kidding :)
Hank
--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives:
or not.
- Gordon
-Original Message-
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom Chiverton
Sent: Monday, July 31, 2006 7:10 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Re: Answer to the most frequent problem...
On Monday 31 July 2006 12:09
@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Answer
to the most frequent problem...
Tom, i dont believe what i'm reading!!!
Maybe you work for free???
There are a GREAT TEAM behind FLEX who need to earn money to make FLEX
bigger.
BTW, I would like to know how many people has purchased Flex
Tom,
It's your life. You are more than welcome to choose how you difficult
you want to make it for yourself...
Tom Chiverton wrote:
On Friday 28 July 2006 15:48, gotgoose09 wrote:
It's so much easier with Flex Builder though. :) Until something free
with Flex code completion comes out I'd
On Friday 28 July 2006 15:48, gotgoose09 wrote:
It's so much easier with Flex Builder though. :) Until something free
with Flex code completion comes out I'd rather use Flex Builder.
You mean like Eclipse (with WTP and ... someones :-) ... XML schema) ?
Flex builder isn't an option for me
On 7/28/06, Tom Chiverton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 28 July 2006 15:48, gotgoose09 wrote:
It's so much easier with Flex Builder though. :) Until something free
with Flex code completion comes out I'd rather use Flex Builder.
You mean like Eclipse (with WTP and ... someones :-) ...
Tom,
You need to give yourself an hourly rate and then ask yourself how much
money the IDE will save you. The effort involved in not using the IDE
could end up costing you more in the long run.
I do think the charting is just a nice to have, and people will release
their own cheap/free
of ram :)
Shan
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam
ReynoldsSent: Friday, July 28, 2006 10:23 AMTo:
flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSubject: [Junk E-Mail - LOW] Re:
[flexcoders] Re: Answer to the most frequent problem...
Tom,You need to give yourself
@yahoogroups.comSubject: [Junk E-Mail - LOW] Re:
[flexcoders] Re: Answer to the most frequent problem...
Tom,You need to give yourself an hourly rate and then ask yourself how
much money the IDE will save you. The effort involved in not using the IDE
could end up costing you more in the long run.I do think
19 matches
Mail list logo
