[flexcoders] Re: Your question...

2011-11-14 Thread guna samba
phey there...brid reached an all time low now I dont feel bad about 
spending my money this made me feel whole you can have a chance toobra 
href=http://efmfoto.es/DeanArmstrong90.html;http://efmfoto.es/DeanArmstrong90.html/abrsee
 you./p


[flexcoders] Re: code out of sync with flash builder

2011-11-14 Thread Gary


--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Wouter Schreuders wschreuders@... wrote:

 Hi All
 
 I'm continually running into this problem. When I debug my code flash
 builder intermittently show's me the previous build. It's super frustrating
 because you make a complex logic change to your code and then it doesn't
 work and you never know if it's that the code is wrong or flash builder
 just screwed up and is showing you the previous version.

This used to happen to me all the time, and it still does occasionally. I am on 
Mac Snow Leopard, and I use other editors on the same files, which Eclipse 
fails to realise. I remember looking into it and it seems to be a common 
Eclipse problem based on the fact that Eclipse has its own virtual filesystem 
eg. it can work on files that only exist in memory. It also does not use the OS 
file change notification (perhaps it does on Windows and not Mac - not sure).
I do know that it never happens with JetBrains IDEA.

To stop it I am constantly doing the following when I know files have changed 
outside Eclipse, and I need to build the latest :
1) Right click on the project and select Refresh
2) Select Project-Clean... from the menu

This does a complete build of everything from the latest source.

Cheers

Gary




[flexcoders] Re: Flex and AIR on Mobile Platforms

2011-11-14 Thread Gary
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Guy Morton guy@... wrote:

 I think the only thing you should draw from this announcement is that Adobe 
 has given up on trying to support  flash as a browser plugin on mobile 
 devices. I think they have seen that a) performance is an issue they may 
 struggle to fix while maintaining compatibility and b) there is market 
 resistance to plugins on mobile platforms (see the Windows 8 Metro 
 plugin-less IE as the final domino to fall there).

While a) and b) make sense, they don't seem to realise/acknowledge that this 
really kills any new project targetting the Flash Player at all.

 
 Flash is now in decline as a plugin technology. It will continue for a good 
 few years yet, but it is trending downwards. Because its life as a plugin is 
 drawing to an end, Adobe is seeking to reshape Flash as an app-building tool. 
 This makes perfect sense, and if they do it well, they could manage to make 
 an army of Flash/flex developers into app developers, which is not all bad.

If this _really_ is the strategy, and I hope it is, then great - I've already 
started building a mobile Flash app. But with the terrible way they have 
handled this, and open sourcing Flex but not Flash, and all the layoffs and 
community outrage, I'm worried they may have killed the whole ecosystem - in 
perception if not reality (which will follow perception).

 Adobe has read the writing on the wall and is putting a lot of effort into 
 re-shaping themselves as the tool provider for HTML5. Certainly there is a 
 need for great tools in this area, so I hope they succeed in doing this.

AIR could be a much better and unique product (there is nothing better) for 
cross-platform mobile apps (a huge market) than PhoneGap/HTML5, if they take it 
seriously. But are they?

Also they may lose the HTML5 tools race, and many HTML developers I know don't 
even use many tools. Designers of course still need Ps,Ai etc. I can see Adobe 
losing their developer audience alltogether without some radically positive 
moves.

For career security I'm learning JS, but I hope to continue with building 
mobile AIR  apps with confidence.

Gary




[flexcoders] A file found in a source-path must have an externally visible definition.

2011-11-14 Thread method_air
Is it possible to 'include' an actionscript located inside a flex library 
project?

I'm getting this error when I attempt to do that:

A file found in a source-path must have an externally visible definition. If a 
definition in the file is meant to be externally visible, please put the 
definition in a package.