These probably are just warnings. When you export a release version it likes to
show you any warnings, even if there aren't any errors. Check the filesystem to
see if your release version SWF really is getting created. If it is, then you
have nothing to worry about. However, you should get rid
change:
checkbox.setStyle( textRollOverCol or, 0x00ff00)
to either:
checkbox.setStyle( textRollOverCol or, 0x00ff00)
or
checkbox.setStyle( textRollOverCol or, #00ff00)
You don't need the quotes if you're sending the color as a hexidecimal uint.
- Original Message
From: blc187
But don't buy just any version. The Standard version doesn't include charting
components, so you have to buy the $699 Professional version.
Unless you're an education customer (student, faculty, or staff) then you can
get it FREE at https://www.flexregistration.com/
- Original Message
Rick! Get back here! I'm not quite done with the inside of your left cheek!
- Original Message
From: Rick Winscot [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 2, 2008 4:51:58 PM
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] remover water mark from Trial version
I’d be happy to
, but, .. no column background
anymore. So, it's the same as not to have column background in the
first place. But what I want is to have columns with backgrounds and
then color some rows keeping columns unchanged. Is that possible in
Flex?
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com, Enjoy Jake enjoy_jake
Perhaps the fix is obvious, but if not just add a couple null checks. After
all, if colBGs is null, then it's certainly not going to be displayed in
front of rowBGs so there's no need to swap them. Something like this should
do fine:
override protected function
Tracy, you rock.
Dan, perhaps these suggestions are obvious, but ... when you send it up the
the net check the timestamp on the file to make sure you're really sending it
up the there. Also, try clearing your browser cache.
- Original Message
From: Tracy Spratt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
I thought the only time the framework dispatches the close event on a popup
is when the user clicks the close button (which only shows up if
showCloseButton == true). If you want to listen for the close event, you'll
have to dispatch it yourself.
I recommend changing your code to
) );
PopUpManager. removePopUp( this);actionSele cted = 'test1'
actionSelected = 'test' after either click.
But I need to know what was actually clicked.
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com, Enjoy Jake enjoy_jake@ ... wrote:
I thought the only time the framework dispatches the close event
on a popup
Peter Ent posted a very well written article about coloring DataGrids:
http://weblogs.macromedia.com/pent/archives/2007/02/coloring_the_ba.html
PS In case you didn't know, Peter Ent rocks.
- Original Message
From: markgoldin_2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Sent:
. ContextMenu
for example or a button click.
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com, Enjoy Jake enjoy_jake@ ... wrote:
Peter Ent posted a very well written article about coloring
DataGrids:
http://weblogs. macromedia. com/pent/ archives/ 2007/02/coloring _the_ba.ht
ml
PS In case you didn't know, Peter
- listening to close
Still, handleCloseFromTitl eWindow is what gets executed when I click
on a button.
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com, Enjoy Jake enjoy_jake@ ... wrote:
Try something like this:
TitleWindow close=handleCloseF romTitleWindow( event)/
Button click=handleCloseF romButton
If you no longer dispatch the CloseEvent when the button is clicked, then
handleCloseFromTitleWindow shouldn't get **called**.
- Original Message
From: Enjoy Jake [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 2:19:06 PM
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Re: Popup
:58 PM
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Popup - listening to close
And now we are getting back to my original question:
popupWindow. addEventListener (close, Handle);
does not dispatch button's click with code:
PopUpManager. removePopUp( this);
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com, Enjoy Jake enjoy_jake
Here's a quick sample I through together for you. There are two files, one is
the main application file, and the other is the extended datagrid.
Application
#
?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8?
mx:Application xmlns:mx=http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml; layout=vertical
);
and that's why I dont row color change when I call
invalidateDisplayLi st later on.
Is that correct? If yes, then what else would you suggest to get row
background change on demand?
Thanks
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com, Enjoy Jake enjoy_jake@ ... wrote:
Here's a quick sample I through together
I'm not sure I understand what the problem is here, but if you're just looking
to get rid of the warning you can do
text={Object(data).display}
- Original Message
From: Tracy Spratt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 4:21:46 PM
Subject:
One-on-one chats could be saved and made searchable. But it seems like no one
liked my idea anyway, so I won't bother with it.
- Original Message
From: Tracy Spratt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 10:45:29 AM
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Re:
The first time I sent this, it only went to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I apologize to
those who received it twice.
Maybe a mailing list like this isn't the best choice. Maybe it's time to create
a more customized solution for solving our problems. I'd be happy to put
something together (and even host
Actually, a box with only one child is optimized to layout extremely
efficiently, so this is not a bad solution. Another possibility would be to use
the Container class.
- Original Message
From: Richard Rodseth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
of immediate
feedback
- Original Message
From: Enjoy Jake [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 3:56:16 PM
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Re: Splitting FlexCoders in smaller, focused groups
The first time I sent this, it only went to flexcoders-owner
21 matches
Mail list logo
