Re: [flexcoders] getting the sum of values in list datafield.
IMHO - you should create a separate bindable string and set the value to that
instead of directly setting the .text property of a text field. Your reduce
function seems ok - just run each object through the filter function to see if
it returns true. Only objects that return true should be added to the sum.
You are 99% of the way there. What is tripping you up?
Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 29, 2014, at 4:55 AM, "stinas...@yahoo.com [flexcoders]"
> wrote:
>
> Hello, i have a flex list that is populated by an arraycollection. in the
> arraycollection i have a field subTotal and i would like to calculate the
> subtotals from that field and pin them to a text component and i would like
> to do that even when the list is filtered. below is my code
>
>
> http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml";
> layout="vertical"
> width="100%"
> height="100%"
> verticalAlign="top"
> verticalGap="0"
> paddingTop="0"
> paddingBottom="0"
> paddingLeft="0"
> paddingRight="0"
> xmlns:ns1="ascript.*"
> creationComplete="init()"
> initialize="initDate()"
> xmlns:ns2="components.*">
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> destination="ColdFusion"
> source="moRentals.src.CFCs.crud"
> showBusyCursor="true"
>
> fault="CursorManager.removeBusyCursor();Alert.show(event.fault.message)">
>
> result="expenseResult(event)"/>
>
>
>
>precision="0"
> thousandsSeparatorTo=","
> useThousandsSeparator="true"
> rounding="up"
> currencySymbol="UGX "/>
>
>formatString=" DD, "/>
>
> width="100%"
> height="50"
> verticalAlign="middle"
> verticalGap="0">
>
>
>
>
>
>
> height="100%"
> horizontalGap="0">
> height="100%"
> verticalGap="0"
> backgroundColor="#818284"
> horizontalAlign="center">
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> backgroundColor="#FF"
> verticalGap="0">
>
>
> paddingLeft="40"
> paddingRight="45"
> verticalAlign="middle"
> height="66">
>
>styleName="listLabel"/>
>change="expenseAr.refresh();"/>
>styleName="listLabel"/>
>change="expenseAr.refresh();"/>
>
> click="createdaddPopup()"/>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> paddingLeft="40"
> paddingRight="46"
> verticalAlign="middle"
> height="36">
>
>width="120"
> styleName="listLabelHeading"/>
>width="90"
> styleName="listLabelHeading"/>
>width="130"
> styleName="listLabelHeading"/>
>width="90"
> styleName="listLabelHeading"/>
>width="90"
> styleName="listLabelHeading"/>
>width="90"
> styleName="listLabelHeading"/>
>
>
>
>
>
> width="100%"
> dataProvider="{expenseAr}"
> itemRenderer="renderers.expenseListRenderer"
> selectedIndex="0"
> height="100%"
> paddingBottom="0"
> borderSkin="{null}"/>
> backgroundColor="#0F76BB"
> height="35"
> verticalAlign="middle"
> paddingLeft="20"
> paddingRight="20">
>
>
>
>
>
Re: [flexcoders] Re: Future Scope of Flex
Wow - I really don't think this is the forum for character assassination. I've been a polyglot developer and architect for 20 years. One thing in technology is constant - that is change. Adapt. It is childish to cling to a technology like a fanboy. Dynamic languages use different paradigms than strongly typed languages. In these contexts functional styles and extension through composition are favored over extension through inheritance. But these are all just tools for communication between the dev and the user. The users have chosen a route that no longer needs flex/flash. That is neither good nor bad - it just is. You may dislike parts of technology A and think it's inferior to technology B - but have you considered the notion that possibly you may be trying I hammer nails with a saw? You may dislike that JS does not have the type safety of AS. But if you are relying on type checking you are missing the boat. The compiler can't check if your logic is bad. It can only check that something like tab a is in slot b. You still have to unit test. All the skills you bring to solve a problem are only marginally helped by the compiler bitching that a class does not have a method to support an interface. There is nothing inherently bad about prototypical inheritance as opposed to class based inheritance. As a matter of fact you typically don't need to use inheritance in JS. Tell me - is it cleaner to devolve functionality into representations that can be decorated onto any object - and you test the functionality itself? Or to HAVE to inherit from class A in order to get the features if class A? You can't do multiple inheritance in AS - so you have to hack around with interfaces and utils or you must repeat yourself. In JS - just decorate what you need with what you need it to do. It's all good bro. I'm just saying that as a seasoned flex dev that feared moving to JS - in my experience - it was an easy transition. But whatever. Have a great day! And I accept the apology you certainly forgot to add by calling me a manager :). I realize it's hard to be civil when someone is wrong on the internet. Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 18, 2014, at 9:50 AM, "danielpr...@yahoo.com [flexcoders]" > wrote: > > > js is almost exactly like Actionscript. > > Typical of a JS advocate, no real knowledge of object oriented structures and > concepts. Bet this is by another manager type that doesn't know an array from > a variable (actually that WOULD be the same level of knowledge in this case > wouldn't it.) >
Re: [flexcoders] Re: Future Scope of Flex
I built the Rosetta Stone user interface in flex and the EA Pogo flex games interface and online store were also built by me. I was using flash when it was the Futuresplash player. I was a very early adopter. Adobe F'd it in the A by mismanaging the technology that WAS really great. But - time goes on and you change technologies. I wrote a ton of Lingo in director too - along with vbscript for IE only interfaces. I've had my share of dead end technologies. Technologies rise and fall - a good dev realizes it's all pretty much the same from tech to tech - the syntax changes but the patterns are transferable. Now though - there is no justifiable reason to do any development in flex. Adobe has given up on it. It is not going to be a viable platform for the future. Luckily - js is almost exactly like Actionscript. Anybody that is good at AS can write JS in no time. Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 16, 2014, at 8:22 PM, "danielpr...@yahoo.com [flexcoders]" > wrote: > > I notice you don't compare it to your prior experience developing user > interfaces in flash? > >
[flexcoders] Re: Future Scope of Flex
Technologies come and go. When I was a kid - the coolest thing in the world was the NextStep computer. It died but eventually reemerged as the Mac OS. Languages come and go as well. Flex and AS were great for a time - but the proprietary nature of the language killed it a few years ago. The web in general has moved away from plugin based interfaces. As standards have come together - the browser makes have adopted js as the language of choice with CSS/HTML for templates and styles. That's not something to fear - that's just the way technology works. It's a tool. JS is easy to learn - so learn it. The tools available today in various platforms are easy to pick up as well. JS has some truly great parts - like promises - that were never really implemented in Flex/flash. I think it's a good idea as a dev to always keep learning. It doesn't matter that tech A is killed by tech B --- if you keep learning you will always have a job. Sent from my iPhone
Re: [flexcoders] Problems creating/updating DB record with selection from DropDownList
It looks like you are setting the status on the change in the drop down list
but not casting it. Is that your issue? The change handler does not seem
attached - what is triggering it? When you debug it - what are the contents of
the drop down list data provider?
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 5, 2012, at 8:31 AM, "hermeszfineart" wrote:
> I have been trying to migrate certain form fields from to
> where the DB columns have foreign keys to different tables
> (i.e. Status, Categories, Dimensions) so the user does not need to type the
> values. When I attempt to update the DB record it populates the field with
> "[object Status]". This implementation is primarily for the back office
> management of the application but some of this type of functionallity will be
> used to drive the front end as well in the future.
>
> I know I must be missing something very simple so any help is appreciated.
>
> Here is the applicable code:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> text="{originals.status}"/>
>
>
> labelField="status" styleName="formContent"
> skinClass="CustomSkins.CustomDropDownListSkin" dataProvider="{statusList}"
> prompt="{originals.status}"
>
> change="{_selectedStatus = dropDownStatusList.selectedItem}"
> creationComplete="dropDownList_creationCompleteHandler(event)"
>
> symbolColor="#FF" borderColor="#c3c3c3" width="157" color="#00">
>
>
>
>
>
>
Re: [flexcoders] You are the product
Do you have any examples that look better than what flash 5 delivered? Sent from my iPhone On Dec 17, 2011, at 1:44 PM, Guy Morton wrote: > Using HTML/JS/CSS you CAN do apps that look every bit as nice as Flash apps, > and they run everywhere. > > > Yes, there are challenges. Yes, IE is still a problem, if you choose to > support it directly (personally I like the Google Chrome Frame solution to > IE), but libraries such as JQuery and Raphael solve a lot of problems. > > Yes, you will have to learn some new stuff. But, on the upside, you get a > true cross-platform delivery - the ONLY one that delivers on all devices. > > Guy > > > On 17/12/2011, at 8:36 AM, Scott Fanetti wrote: > >> >> >> Except for the fact that HTML 5 apps look like shit compared to flash, the >> run like shit, they can be freely stolen by anyone - and generally they rely >> on lots of browser and CSS hacks to be pseudo consistent. >> >> Html5 really sucks - its just a shame the world has decided Flash must no >> longer be used for anything. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Dec 16, 2011, at 1:15 PM, Guy Morton wrote: >> >>> >>> SVG + Javascript + Canvas ARE the equivalent to Flash in the web standards >>> world. >>> >>> >>> >>> On 17/12/2011, at 5:16 AM, Bill Brutzman wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> My sense is that Adobe has realized that it close to impossible to port >>>> Flash to the staggering proliferation of tablets, smart phones, and other >>>> devices. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Does anybody expect Flash to run on a Kindle or a Nook? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> In my little world of fantasy… I wish I knew how Flash worked… Perhaps a >>>> standards-based Flash lite could be cranked into HTML-6. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> --Bill >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com] On >>>> Behalf Of Kevin MacDonald >>>> Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011 12:50 PM >>>> To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com >>>> Subject: Re: [flexcoders] You are the product >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Good points. Thanks for responding. I'm not sure why you conflate me >>>> knocking Adobe for a lack of willingness to learn. I code on a daily basis >>>> in half a dozen languages for a small company struggling to reach >>>> profitability. Our client application is one piece of that. The 'learning' >>>> in this case is that some companies can be trusted more than others. Adobe >>>> puts forth a consistent marketing message to software developers: "Trust >>>> us! Follow us!", and they consistently fail to live up to that in order to >>>> sell us the next round of developer tools. Microsoft, while clearly >>>> capable of various brands of skulduggery, has consistently maintained a >>>> level of loyalty to their developers, and it has succeeded famously for >>>> them. Have you every noticed that 15 year old programs still run on >>>> Windows 7? I don't expect that from Adobe. But the heavy sell job on AIR >>>> followed by stepping at arms length from it irks me. >>>> >>>> Kevin >>>> >>>> >>>> 2011/12/16 Csomák Gábor >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> technology simply changes. i met a guy who was the lead engineer of >>>> commodore 64. do you think when he was on the top of his career, he >>>> stopped learning? this segment changes a lot. it is a lifelong learning. >>>> get used to it. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> html5 is not ready. even w3c says it'll be in 2014 (as i remember). and i >>>> think, it won't kill air. neither flash. of course it will depend on a lot >>>> of things, but the two technologies are good in different segments. you >>>> cannot do a prezi.com in html5, and you cannot do an entire webpage in >>>> flash. (login remembers will not work, etc...) >>>> >>>> the key is to know both, and know when to use what. >>>> >>>> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 7:02 PM, Kevin MacDonald >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>
Re: [flexcoders] You are the product
Except for the fact that HTML 5 apps look like shit compared to flash, the run like shit, they can be freely stolen by anyone - and generally they rely on lots of browser and CSS hacks to be pseudo consistent. Html5 really sucks - its just a shame the world has decided Flash must no longer be used for anything. Sent from my iPhone On Dec 16, 2011, at 1:15 PM, Guy Morton wrote: > SVG + Javascript + Canvas ARE the equivalent to Flash in the web standards > world. > > > > On 17/12/2011, at 5:16 AM, Bill Brutzman wrote: > >> >> >> My sense is that Adobe has realized that it close to impossible to port >> Flash to the staggering proliferation of tablets, smart phones, and other >> devices. >> >> >> >> Does anybody expect Flash to run on a Kindle or a Nook? >> >> >> >> In my little world of fantasy… I wish I knew how Flash worked… Perhaps a >> standards-based Flash lite could be cranked into HTML-6. >> >> >> >> --Bill >> >> >> >> From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com] On >> Behalf Of Kevin MacDonald >> Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011 12:50 PM >> To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com >> Subject: Re: [flexcoders] You are the product >> >> >> >> >> >> Good points. Thanks for responding. I'm not sure why you conflate me >> knocking Adobe for a lack of willingness to learn. I code on a daily basis >> in half a dozen languages for a small company struggling to reach >> profitability. Our client application is one piece of that. The 'learning' >> in this case is that some companies can be trusted more than others. Adobe >> puts forth a consistent marketing message to software developers: "Trust us! >> Follow us!", and they consistently fail to live up to that in order to sell >> us the next round of developer tools. Microsoft, while clearly capable of >> various brands of skulduggery, has consistently maintained a level of >> loyalty to their developers, and it has succeeded famously for them. Have >> you every noticed that 15 year old programs still run on Windows 7? I don't >> expect that from Adobe. But the heavy sell job on AIR followed by stepping >> at arms length from it irks me. >> >> Kevin >> >> >> 2011/12/16 Csomák Gábor >> >> >> >> technology simply changes. i met a guy who was the lead engineer of >> commodore 64. do you think when he was on the top of his career, he stopped >> learning? this segment changes a lot. it is a lifelong learning. get used to >> it. >> >> >> >> html5 is not ready. even w3c says it'll be in 2014 (as i remember). and i >> think, it won't kill air. neither flash. of course it will depend on a lot >> of things, but the two technologies are good in different segments. you >> cannot do a prezi.com in html5, and you cannot do an entire webpage in >> flash. (login remembers will not work, etc...) >> >> the key is to know both, and know when to use what. >> >> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 7:02 PM, Kevin MacDonald >> wrote: >> >> >> >> Hello developers, >> >> >> >> I have come to some unfortunate conclusions about how Adobe operates. I >> would be interested to get your opinions on the matter. >> >> >> >> Some years ago I helped build out a desktop application using Macromedia >> Director. It ran on both Mac and Windows, and was heavily backed by web >> services. In principle it was much like an Adobe AIR app might be today. >> After a few years Adobe bought Macromedia Director, with promises to the >> developer community that they would continue to support it. They came out >> with a few maintenance releases that were extremely buggy, enough so that we >> tried to roll back to the previous version. However, Adobe made sure there >> were some gotchas that made it painful to either stay on the current version >> or roll back. Shortly thereafter they killed Director altogether. >> >> >> >> An Adobe evangelist came to our office and sold us hard on moving to Adobe >> AIR, which we did. We completely re-wrote our application on that platform. >> Now, several years later, Adobe is very obviously moving away from AIR and >> towards HTML5, again with promises to their loyal developers to continue >> supporting it. >> >> >> >> Based on their history what I expect Adobe to do is kill AIR before too >> long. And you should have no doubts that they can make it very painful to >> remain on that platform. For example, AIR apps use whatever version of Adobe >> Reader is installed on the client machine. Adobe Reader updates happen >> independently of updates to the AIR run time. The latest update to Adobe >> Reader broke certain aspects of our client application, something that might >> directly hurt our business. What can you do when the HTMLLoader object no >> longer correctly displays a PDF? What I expected Adobe to do - and what the >> evangelist led me to believe - was that Adobe would evolve AIR and Flash >> Builder towards HTML5 over time, bringing all of
[flexcoders] Re: getting the total of values of an array collection that is updated manually
The textfield has change events - you can use that to get the new value - then
recompute the sum. Pseudocode:
private function onChange( e:Event ):void {
doSum();
}
private function doSum():void {
...
}
Re: [flexcoders] getting the total of values of an array collection that is updated manually
The way I would do this is to add a change event listener to the array
collection - and in the listener I would iterate through the collection to sum
the values. I would also create a value object to hold your data in a type
safe fashion. You could then use data binding to get UI updates in the item
renderer.
You should also create a model to hold your applications state. Update the sum
in the model and bind the model's sum value to the view's display.
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 2, 2011, at 7:43 AM, "ZIONIST" wrote:
> Hi Guys, i would like to get the total price calculated as an array
> collection for a list is populated plus i would like to update the total when
> the quantity changes too. Here is the code i have so far, could someone
> please help me correct it.
>
> "Main App"
>
> http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml";
> layout="horizontal"
> xmlns:ns1="*">
>
>
> name="text"
> value="Dark Chocolate"/>
> name="text"
> value="50"/>
>
>
> name="text"
> value="Drinking Chocolate"/>
> name="text"
> value="100"/>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> height="300">
> y="10"
> text="Milk Chocolate"
> id="product"/>
> y="36"
> text="10"
> id="price"/>
> y="62"
> label="submit"
> click="addProduct();init()"/>
> y="92"
> label="Change State"
> click="currentState='dark'"/>
> y="122"
> label="Drinking Chocolate"
> click="currentState='spread'"/>
>
>
> height="340"
> horizontalAlign="center"
> verticalAlign="middle">
> width="300"
> height="300"
> dataProvider="{orderColl}"
> itemRenderer="orderRenderer"/>
>
> color="#FF"
> fontWeight="bold"/>
> text="${}"/>
>
>
>
>
>
> "Item Renderer (orderRenderer.mxml)"
>
>
> http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml";
> width="100%"
> height="100%"
> horizontalAlign="center"
> verticalAlign="middle"
> horizontalGap="0">
>
>
> styleName="orderLabel"/>
>
> text="${Number(qty.text)* Number(oldPrice.text)}"
> styleName="orderLabel"/>
> width="30"
> height="20"
> text="1"
> styleName="qtyInput"/>
>
> text="{data.Price}"
> visible="false"
> includeInLayout="false"/>
>
>
>
>
Re: [flexcoders] image is caching
You should hash the images and use the hash as the name - that way image will not be cached if it changes. Or just change the name each time- append the date for instance. Sent from my iPhone On Nov 18, 2011, at 9:03 AM, Michael Sumner wrote: > Working on a home owners association site. I am uploading a pet picture, it > is getting to the server, being processed, I am changing the name to > reference the residence and the pet. In the tab for pets I have a spark > image and I use the source property and relative paths to the image. Once an > image is uploaded, if someone would want to change it in the same session the > picture uploads and changes on the server but the image does not change > particularly if you use IE. After a successful upload I have tried setting > the source to null, to a default blank image until the user picks a pet in a > datagrid. If I clear the browser cache in IE it will change but that is > about it. Firefox works well – change the image and it will show the new > image. Most of the residents will probably have IE, I am hosted on a > ColdFusion server and have added cfheader tags on my local box but that makes > no difference either. > > > > Any suggestions are welcome. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Mike > > > > > >
[flexcoders] Re: Transitions - How to
It's not clear from your example what's is going on. Is the textArea even created by the time the outer container changes state? Sent from my iPhone
[flexcoders] Re: problem with the sand box on air app
Read: http://help.adobe.com/en_US/as3/dev/WS5b3ccc516d4fbf351e63e3d118a9b90204-7e3f.html It goes into detail about the security sandbox an application exists within. What exactly are you trying to do? Sent from my iPhone
[flexcoders] Re: problem with the sand box on air app
Have you tried dispatching events from the remote file for doing things like managing the stage - and letting the swf in the local security domain ( app: iglesia.swf ) do the calls for scaleMode and such? Sent from my iPhone
RE: [flexcoders] Re: Weird Gradient Fill error
Roger - I posted a few days ago about the continued gradient fill funk in Beta 2. Do you have any more information about why these gradient fills continue to fail to transcode?this is the link to the archived message:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/message/32258Roger Gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: There were several gradient fill bugs that I recently fixed. The next beta build should solve your problems, but let me know if it doesn't! -rg From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ScottFanettiSent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 1:54 PMTo:flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSubject: [flexcoders] Re: Weird GradientFill error Does anyone know if anyone has been having weird compile time bugswith Flex when they try to import a shape or symbol from Flash 8that has a gradient fill? The gradient stoke seems to work fine, butwhen I tried to import a shape with a gradient fill that used any of the Flash8 gradient transforms or overflow features it errors with: Unable totranscode ../media/NewGradientFillWithGradientStroke.swf unrecognized fillstyle type: 19 I guess these things are to be expected with Betasoftware.Scott FanettiRosettaStone.com SPONSORED LINKS Web site design development Computer software development Software design and development Macromedia flex Software development best practice Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. PC-to-Phone calls for ridiculously low rates. -- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com SPONSORED LINKS Web site design development Computer software development Software design and development Macromedia flex Software development best practice YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "flexcoders" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[flexcoders] Gradient fill error in Flex Beta 2 and Beta 1
Roger or Flexcoders Gurus,I sent this to Roger and Flexcoders a few days ago but I don't know if anyone received it. I packaged the files into a zip archive and I think yahoo's mail daemon might have bounced the message.I reported a very funky transcoding issue with gradient filled swfs embedded into Flex 2 - I am attaching the swfs and .as files as examples of this behavior.The file ebd.as is the project main file. Each class file embeds one swf ( done so that I could isolate which swfs where issues and which were okay ). Classes that worked without issue were ommited from this email. Classes that included dynamic text were also ommitted. They failed too, but the error thrown was probably related to the fact that dynamic text from Flash 8 may not be compatible with text from Flash 8.5.Any help you can provide would be greatly appreciated.ThanksScott Fanetti Blab-away for as little as 1¢/min. Make PC-to-Phone Calls using Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. -- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "flexcoders" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. LinearNewGradient.swf Description: 1625410399-LinearNewGradient.swf LinearNewGradientWithSymbol.swf Description: 3182471086-LinearNewGradientWithSymbol.swf NewGradientFillSymbolNoGradientStroke.swf Description: 2034835733-NewGradientFillSymbolNoGradientStroke.swf NewGradientFillWithGradientStroke.swf Description: 1115121019-NewGradientFillWithGradientStroke.swf NewGradientFillWithOutGradientStroke.swf Description: 2205365609-NewGradientFillWithOutGradientStroke.swf LinearNewGradient.as Description: 1178730395-LinearNewGradient.as LinearNewGradientWithSymbol.as Description: 524243548-LinearNewGradientWithSymbol.as NewGradientFillSymbolNoGradientStroke.as Description: 2400453199-NewGradientFillSymbolNoGradientStroke.as NewGradientFillWithGradientStroke.as Description: 72557332-NewGradientFillWithGradientStroke.as NewGradientFillWithOutGradientStroke.as Description: 2777617239-NewGradientFillWithOutGradientStroke.as ebd.as Description: 1717086368-ebd.as
[flexcoders] Beta 2 debugger issues
Is anyone having major problems getting anything to debug with the Beta 2 debugger?I am trying to update some of my Beta 1 apps to Beta 2 and the debugger perspective takes forever to launch - and the debugger itself times out before the application builds. Does anyone have this same problem? -- Thanks,Scott FanettiSoftware EngineerFairfield Language TechnologiesRosettastone.com[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "flexcoders" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[flexcoders] Gradient Fill bugs in Beta 1 and Beta 2
There were several gradient fill bugs in Beta 1 - do any of you Macrodobe folks know if they have been fixed for Beta 3? I built a test harness to check if swfs with gradients could be embedded and I still cannot get them to transcode. Additionally, the as classes that feature an embed directive have a new error: Definition of base class 'SkinSprite' not found SkinSprite used to be in mx.core but I can't find it now. Any suggestions? -- Thanks,Scott FanettiSoftware EngineerFairfield Language TechnologiesRosettastone.com[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com SPONSORED LINKS Web site design development Computer software development Software design and development Macromedia flex Software development best practice YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "flexcoders" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [flexcoders] Re: Weird Gradient Fill error
Roger,Do you have any timeline on when Beta 2 is going live?ThanksScott FanettiRosettaStone.com -- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com SPONSORED LINKS Web site design development Computer software development Software design and development Macromedia flex Software development best practice YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "flexcoders" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[flexcoders] Re: Weird Gradient Fill error
Does anyone know if anyone has been having weird compile time bugs with Flex when they try to import a shape or symbol from Flash 8 that has a gradient fill? The gradient stoke seems to work fine, but when I tried to import a shape with a gradient fill that used any of the Flash 8 gradient transforms or overflow features it errors with: Unable to transcode ../media/NewGradientFillWithGradientStroke.swf unrecognized fill style type: 19 I guess these things are to be expected with Beta software.Scott FanettiRosettaStone.com -- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com SPONSORED LINKS Web site design development Computer software development Software design and development Macromedia flex Software development best practice YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "flexcoders" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
