Re: [flexcoders] Re: WebService - What's wrong with this code?
On Monday 21 August 2006 12:54, Samuel D. Colak wrote: Is it thus by implication that FDS become some form of flash Hibernate ? There are people working on that right now :-) -- Tom Chiverton Helping to confidentially target second-generation systems This email is sent for and on behalf of Halliwells LLP. Halliwells LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales under registered number OC307980 whose registered office address is at St James's Court Brown Street Manchester M2 2JF. A list of members is available for inspection at the registered office. Any reference to a partner in relation to Halliwells LLP means a member of Halliwells LLP. Regulated by the Law Society. CONFIDENTIALITY This email is intended only for the use of the addressee named above and may be confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the addressee you must not read it and must not use any information contained in nor copy it nor inform any person other than Halliwells LLP or the addressee of its existence or contents. If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify Halliwells LLP IT Department on 0870 365 8008. For more information about Halliwells LLP visit www.halliwells.com. -- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [flexcoders] Re: WebService - What's wrong with this code?
On Sunday 20 August 2006 16:55, Samuel D. Colak wrote: why - Its obvious that actionscript has taken a significant leap in development, so why is everyone here talking about a 3rd product (FDS) to do what you can really easily achieve under AS. There are some use cases, where what FDS gives you (data sync and poll-less server push) is usefull, and a pain to have to write yourself. -- Tom Chiverton Helping to vitalistically optimize scalable CEOs This email is sent for and on behalf of Halliwells LLP. Halliwells LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales under registered number OC307980 whose registered office address is at St James's Court Brown Street Manchester M2 2JF. A list of members is available for inspection at the registered office. Any reference to a partner in relation to Halliwells LLP means a member of Halliwells LLP. Regulated by the Law Society. CONFIDENTIALITY This email is intended only for the use of the addressee named above and may be confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the addressee you must not read it and must not use any information contained in nor copy it nor inform any person other than Halliwells LLP or the addressee of its existence or contents. If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify Halliwells LLP IT Department on 0870 365 8008. For more information about Halliwells LLP visit www.halliwells.com. -- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [flexcoders] Re: WebService - What's wrong with this code?
Is it thus by implication that FDS become some form of flash Hibernate ? Because personally id like to know if that were the case. In terms of data-sync, this is not part of any webservice specification and as for poll-less server push - well that's just against the whole notion of webservices in the first place and should be relegated to the area of messaging services - not data-services. By the way - it becomes more interesting that the Date format issue is cropping up quite a bit now (even in the PHP world) - Is there per chance a specific way of pushing this for implementation? Being honest, String, Integer, Date, Boolean are standard datatypes which should all be accessible via webservices - any reason why date isnt fully supported yet? Sorry if this sounds like a gripe but it is actually in a few cases, a deal breaker. Samuel On 21/8/06 10:29, Tom Chiverton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sunday 20 August 2006 16:55, Samuel D. Colak wrote: why - Its obvious that actionscript has taken a significant leap in development, so why is everyone here talking about a 3rd product (FDS) to do what you can really easily achieve under AS. There are some use cases, where what FDS gives you (data sync and poll-less server push) is usefull, and a pain to have to write yourself. -- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[flexcoders] Re: WebService - What's wrong with this code?
Samuel, I am not sure why you're comparing FDS and web services so closely. They are 2 different technologies meant to do 2 different things. That is, 2 different ways of getting data to your clients. As for your statement that web services are fully implemented in Flex, that is certainly not the case. I would encourage you to follow the links that Franck, Kaleb and myself posted a few messages ago. Adobe themselves have readily admitted that there are some issues with the existing implementation. Ben --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Samuel D. Colak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is it thus by implication that FDS become some form of flash Hibernate ? Because personally id like to know if that were the case. In terms of data-sync, this is not part of any webservice specification and as for poll-less server push - well that's just against the whole notion of webservices in the first place and should be relegated to the area of messaging services - not data-services. By the way - it becomes more interesting that the Date format issue is cropping up quite a bit now (even in the PHP world) - Is there per chance a specific way of pushing this for implementation? Being honest, String, Integer, Date, Boolean are standard datatypes which should all be accessible via webservices - any reason why date isnt fully supported yet? Sorry if this sounds like a gripe but it is actually in a few cases, a deal breaker. Samuel On 21/8/06 10:29, Tom Chiverton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sunday 20 August 2006 16:55, Samuel D. Colak wrote: why - Its obvious that actionscript has taken a significant leap in development, so why is everyone here talking about a 3rd product (FDS) to do what you can really easily achieve under AS. There are some use cases, where what FDS gives you (data sync and poll-less server push) is usefull, and a pain to have to write yourself. -- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
RE: [flexcoders] Re: WebService - What's wrong with this code?
I have quite some experience with webservices now, both as consumer and publisher. Even in non-flex areas it's very hard to get full integration between clients and servers. Webservices are overly complicated, but it's our only hope for what they call hetergoneous interoperability. In the old days there was CORBA, but now it's webservices. The vendors' interpretation of the webservices spec is differing a lot. So heavily that there is now a new organization (WS-I) narrowing the webservices spec down (Basic Profile 1, and so forth). This organization will define the future of webservices (and that's going to be DOC/Literal). As long as the webservices spec leaves room for different interpretations, it will be impossible for Flex to be compliant with all these different interpretations. So, there will be cases where we have to accept that Flex will not be able to fully interoperate with a certain obscure back-end technology. Flex should strive, however, to be compatible with the mostly used technologies in the JAVA, .Net and PHP arena. That's already enough of a challenge. Cheers, Franck -Original Message- From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Samuel D. Colak Sent: Sunday, August 20, 2006 5:55 PM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Re: WebService - What's wrong with this code? Importance: High Guys, flex's interoperability to webservices under Sun/IBM and Microsofts specification is complete - what actually is missing is the literal translation of some datatypes - take for instance the date structure under dotNet is not supported under Flex UNLESS you provide the string representation and then recode this is flex to parse the string. I agree that if you are required to run flex to a back end server/service infrastructure reliant upon one vendors technology then you are pretty much burried. I most hasten to add that so far, flex has been (without any issues i must add) shown to work with back ends running under MacOSX apache/php, IIS 5.0 with dotNet 2 (dotNets framework V1 also works without any issues at all). As for anything else i would suggest some lookup table. Frankly although there is alot of chat here about FDS, i personally wonder why - Its obvious that actionscript has taken a significant leap in development, so why is everyone here talking about a 3rd product (FDS) to do what you can really easily achieve under AS. Just my two cents.. Samuel PS. Im even willing to post my code if necessary to show how easy this is !!! Van: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com namens ben.clinkinbeard Verzonden: zo 20/08/2006 17:12 Aan: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Onderwerp: [flexcoders] Re: WebService - What's wrong with this code? Great post Franck, I think you pretty much hit the nail on the head. Seth, thanks for your reply as well. For those that didn't see the post where I mentioned it, I gave a presentation this past Friday to the tech leads and members of the architecture group in my department. Overall the meeting went very well and most people seemed impressed. I included plenty of code demos that showcased the RAD aspects of Flex and the power of databinding. Most of the questions I got revolved around performance and scalability (so I am looking for good info to send out on those topics if anyone can recommend links), but interoperability was a big theme as well. FDS piqued everyone's interest, but learning that it was Java based deflated that balloon a bit. (I know about WebOrb, if there is enough interest I may investigate that further.) We are a large, Microsoft top to bottom shop, so anything we do has to integrate into that stack. Changing web services to suit Flex is certainly not an option, as the app I am prototyping with it is the UI for one piece of a large system. We will most likely never build an app whose only interface is Flex, so being able to sit Flex on top of what is already there to serve various other pieces is key. Flash/Flex is a hard enough sell as it is most times, due to the fact that it is such a foreign approach to most traditional developers. As I originally said and Franck echoed, Flex's success (read: adoption) will largely hinder on its ability to be plopped down on top of an existing infrastructure and create a kickass user experience. If this can only be done in environments based on Apache Axis, Flex will surely not flourish. I cannot possibly stress enough the need to get full web services support integrated sooner than Flex 3. As for my bizarre problem with Flex sending nulls to my service, it has been recommended that I reinstall FB. I will try that on Monday, but if it doesn't resolve the issue (which I don't think it will), I will need to seriously throttle my push for Flex adoption as I don't enjoy looking like an idiot. Thanks, Ben --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com , Franck de Bruijn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi
RE: [flexcoders] Re: WebService - What's wrong with this code?
Hi Franck, Ben and Kaleb, First a little back story: the current web service stack in Flex shares many similarities with Axis 1.X (some of the same folks authored both). Back when these stacks were originally developed RPC services using SOAP encoding were the rule. So the legacy RPC/Encoded support is solid. There were a variety of general inter-op and validation issues with RPC/Encoded web services and that led to WS-I and the document literal wrapped style. Support for this style is not quite as solid which is unfortunate. This is an area that is being actively worked on now. If you are running into specific problems with document literal wrapped, let us know via Adobe support, the FDS forum (http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/webforums/forum/categories.cfm?forumid=60catid=583) or here, and if it's an option, try out the RPC/Encoded style for the service you're having trouble with. Regarding Kaleb's issue: I'm able to repro the problem of empty args being sent in the call. It's a bug. However, if I adjust the xsd to use a nested complex type for the string arrays like so: ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8? xs:schema xmlns:xs=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema; xmlns:tns=http://server.webservices.tutorials.wakaleo.com/; targetNamespace=http://server.webservices.tutorials.wakaleo.com/; version=1.0 xs:element xmlns:ns1=http://server.webservices.tutorials.wakaleo.com/; type=ns1:sendStrings name=sendStrings/xs:element xs:complexType name=sendStrings xs:sequence xs:element type=tns:ArrayOfString minOccurs=0 maxOccurs=1 name=strings/xs:element /xs:sequence /xs:complexType xs:complexType name=ArrayOfString xs:sequence xs:element minOccurs=0 maxOccurs=unbounded name=string nillable=true type=xs:string / /xs:sequence /xs:complexType xs:element xmlns:ns2=http://server.webservices.tutorials.wakaleo.com/; type=ns2:sendStringsResponse name=sendStringsResponse/xs:element xs:complexType name=sendStringsResponse xs:sequence xs:element type=tns:ArrayOfString minOccurs=0 maxOccurs=1 name=strings/xs:element /xs:sequence /xs:complexType /xs:schema And then make the call: ws.sendStrings([foo, bar]); The outbound SOAP body contains the serialized array of strings: ?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8? SOAP-ENV:Envelope xmlns:SOAP-ENV=http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/; xmlns:xsd=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema; xmlns:xsi=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance;SOAP-ENV:Bodyns1:sendStrings xmlns:ns1=http://server.webservices.tutorials.wakaleo.com/;stringsstringfoo/stringstringbar/string/strings/ns1:sendStrings/SOAP-ENV:Body/SOAP-ENV:Envelope I don't know if you can regenerate your service based on the updated schema but it may be worth a try. Best, Seth -Original Message- From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Franck de Bruijn Sent: Friday, August 18, 2006 9:49 PM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Re: WebService - What's wrong with this code? And today this one came in: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/message/47827 What I sense is that most of the problems are somehow related to DOC/Literal versus RPC/Encoded, but of course I cannot be sure. I'm exposing my webservices both via DOC/Literal and RPC/Encoded. These webservices take a variety of arguments and also return a variety of results. With variety I mean from simple primitive types, to complex objects nested within complex objects containing arrays of Strings. Via RPC/Encoded everything works as a charm (I'm using the Apache AXIS engine), but via DOC/Literal issues arise. Cheers, Franck -Original Message- From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Lee Sent: Friday, August 18, 2006 5:16 PM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Re: WebService - What's wrong with this code? And my personal favorite: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/message/47493 -Original Message- From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ben.clinkinbeard Sent: Friday, August 18, 2006 10:50 AM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: [flexcoders] Re: WebService - What's wrong with this code? Here are a couple. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/messages/47267?threaded=1m=evar=1 tidx=1 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/messages/46548?threaded=1m=evar=1 tidx=1 I can confirm that I am working with an Adobe engineer to try and resolve both issues (our company has a support contract with Adobe), so they are listening and interested in fixing issues people are having. I think thats a good sign. Ben --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Samuel D. Colak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Umm Franck what issues with webservices? On 15/8/06 20:00, Franck de Bruijn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That¹s exactly what Ben is hammering at. It¹s too hard to get webservices up and running in a production-like
RE: [flexcoders] Re: WebService - What's wrong with this code?
Hi Seth, Thanks for your reply. It's always good to hear something from Adobe. I already thought that there were some tight links with Axis, since with the Axis framework everything works like a charm. No problems whatsoever. But with Doc/literal things are going wrong, which is more than a pity, since Doc/literal (as you point out) is the new standard (also for JAVA) and RPC/Encoded not. For me, personally, it's not that big of an issue, since I am in the position to write my own (AXIS based) webservices, but from the mailing list I notice that this is not the case for every one. They are not even in the position to adapt the webservices as you explain below (I already asked). The only work around for these guys I can think of is to develop their own proxy webservice application. But, of course that is not an ideal situation. I agree with Ben that the way to interface with the backend is through webservices only and not through Remote Objects (FDS) and/or HTTP services. With webservices you realize a total decoupling between the client (Flex) and the backend (choose your technology). With FDS you have a lock-in to JAVA and Adobe on the back-end and that's something I do not desire. And especially for the .Net people, it's a no-go. HTTP services are too basic for thorough communication. For the future of Flex, it's of utmost importance that Flex starts interoperating seamlessly with DOC/literal encoded webservices. If not, and Ben expressed this already, Flex will be ruled out in decision meetings (Ben: how did your meeting go?), which would be a great shame, since we are all convinced of the many benefits of Flex over the traditional web client languages, tooling and frameworks. I dare to phrase this even stronger. Flex has a very tough up-hill battle to fight in order to gain market share. In the JAVA-world there is the upcoming trend of AJAX/JSF/JAX-WS (DOC/literal) based solutions. Although these solutions are far (and I mean far far far) inferior to Flex solutions, they are difficult to beat. Purely due to the fact that AJAX/JSF/JAX-WS is heavily promoted by the big companies Sun, Oracle and IBM. In the Microsoft corner the VISTA development platform will come up (following the same track as Flex). You can bet on it that VISTA will have seamless integration with the DOC/Literal webservices. Knowing this, it is my fear that, if Flex will not have 100% seamless support for DOC/Literal webservices, Flex will not survive or at most remain as a niche product. This would be a great defeat, since, for me personally, Flex is the only viable alternative for building RIAs. Already during the alpha releases of Flex I stressed this requirement heavily on the mailing lists and forums (I even submitted a detailed test report). To be honest, I actually find it amazing how much of the webservices you have managed to cover in a lousy 2MB download, since I know how difficult webservices are. But, and that's a great pity, we have to conclude at this stage that this integration has not been realized for 100%; It's not good enough. The good part is, though, that I can see that you guys from Adobe are picking up on it. Ben already offered his help in testing pre-releases of a next version of Flex. I also offer this (I have to stress my schedule though, but I am willing to that) and maybe others will follow. If you're in for this, we can maybe start an offline discussion how to set this up. We could start firing issues when encountered, but that's far from a structural approach, which is needed for this topic, if you ask me. Let us know, Cheers, Franck -Original Message- From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Seth Hodgson Sent: Sunday, August 20, 2006 8:41 AM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Re: WebService - What's wrong with this code? Hi Franck, Ben and Kaleb, First a little back story: the current web service stack in Flex shares many similarities with Axis 1.X (some of the same folks authored both). Back when these stacks were originally developed RPC services using SOAP encoding were the rule. So the legacy RPC/Encoded support is solid. There were a variety of general inter-op and validation issues with RPC/Encoded web services and that led to WS-I and the document literal wrapped style. Support for this style is not quite as solid which is unfortunate. This is an area that is being actively worked on now. If you are running into specific problems with document literal wrapped, let us know via Adobe support, the FDS forum (http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/webforums/forum/categories.cfm?forumid=60cati d=583) or here, and if it's an option, try out the RPC/Encoded style for the service you're having trouble with. Regarding Kaleb's issue: I'm able to repro the problem of empty args being sent in the call. It's a bug. However, if I adjust the xsd to use a nested complex type for the string arrays like so: ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8
[flexcoders] Re: WebService - What's wrong with this code?
report). To be honest, I actually find it amazing how much of the webservices you have managed to cover in a lousy 2MB download, since I know how difficult webservices are. But, and that's a great pity, we have to conclude at this stage that this integration has not been realized for 100%; It's not good enough. The good part is, though, that I can see that you guys from Adobe are picking up on it. Ben already offered his help in testing pre-releases of a next version of Flex. I also offer this (I have to stress my schedule though, but I am willing to that) and maybe others will follow. If you're in for this, we can maybe start an offline discussion how to set this up. We could start firing issues when encountered, but that's far from a structural approach, which is needed for this topic, if you ask me. Let us know, Cheers, Franck -Original Message- From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Seth Hodgson Sent: Sunday, August 20, 2006 8:41 AM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Re: WebService - What's wrong with this code? Hi Franck, Ben and Kaleb, First a little back story: the current web service stack in Flex shares many similarities with Axis 1.X (some of the same folks authored both). Back when these stacks were originally developed RPC services using SOAP encoding were the rule. So the legacy RPC/Encoded support is solid. There were a variety of general inter-op and validation issues with RPC/Encoded web services and that led to WS-I and the document literal wrapped style. Support for this style is not quite as solid which is unfortunate. This is an area that is being actively worked on now. If you are running into specific problems with document literal wrapped, let us know via Adobe support, the FDS forum (http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/webforums/forum/categories.cfm?forumid=60cati d=583) or here, and if it's an option, try out the RPC/Encoded style for the service you're having trouble with. Regarding Kaleb's issue: I'm able to repro the problem of empty args being sent in the call. It's a bug. However, if I adjust the xsd to use a nested complex type for the string arrays like so: ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8? xs:schema xmlns:xs=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema; xmlns:tns=http://server.webservices.tutorials.wakaleo.com/; targetNamespace=http://server.webservices.tutorials.wakaleo.com/; version=1.0 xs:element xmlns:ns1=http://server.webservices.tutorials.wakaleo.com/; type=ns1:sendStrings name=sendStrings/xs:element xs:complexType name=sendStrings xs:sequence xs:element type=tns:ArrayOfString minOccurs=0 maxOccurs=1 name=strings/xs:element /xs:sequence /xs:complexType xs:complexType name=ArrayOfString xs:sequence xs:element minOccurs=0 maxOccurs=unbounded name=string nillable=true type=xs:string / /xs:sequence /xs:complexType xs:element xmlns:ns2=http://server.webservices.tutorials.wakaleo.com/; type=ns2:sendStringsResponse name=sendStringsResponse/xs:element xs:complexType name=sendStringsResponse xs:sequence xs:element type=tns:ArrayOfString minOccurs=0 maxOccurs=1 name=strings/xs:element /xs:sequence /xs:complexType /xs:schema And then make the call: ws.sendStrings([foo, bar]); The outbound SOAP body contains the serialized array of strings: ?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8? SOAP-ENV:Envelope xmlns:SOAP-ENV=http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/; xmlns:xsd=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema; xmlns:xsi=http://www..w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance;SOAP-ENV:Bodyns1:s endStrings xmlns:ns1=http://server.webservices.tutorials.wakaleo.com/;stringsstrin gfoo/stringstringbar/string/strings/ns1:sendStrings/SOAP-ENV:Bod y/SOAP-ENV:Envelope I don't know if you can regenerate your service based on the updated schema but it may be worth a try. Best, Seth -Original Message- From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Franck de Bruijn Sent: Friday, August 18, 2006 9:49 PM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Re: WebService - What's wrong with this code? And today this one came in: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/message/47827 What I sense is that most of the problems are somehow related to DOC/Literal versus RPC/Encoded, but of course I cannot be sure. I'm exposing my webservices both via DOC/Literal and RPC/Encoded. These webservices take a variety of arguments and also return a variety of results. With variety I mean from simple primitive types, to complex objects nested within complex objects containing arrays of Strings. Via RPC/Encoded everything works as a charm (I'm using the Apache AXIS engine), but via DOC/Literal issues arise. Cheers, Franck -Original Message- From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Lee Sent: Friday, August 18, 2006 5:16
Re: [flexcoders] Re: WebService - What's wrong with this code?
Title: Re: [flexcoders] Re: WebService - What's wrong with this code?
Umm Franck what issues with webservices?
On 15/8/06 20:00, Franck de Bruijn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thats exactly what Ben is hammering at.
Its too hard to get webservices up and running in a production-like application easy. Its true that Adobe is focussing more on FDS than on the support for webservices, which is truely a pity. Lets hope itll change in the (near) future. I already saw a good sign of an Adobe engineer trying to look into our problems.
Cheers,
Franck
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Samuel D. Colak
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 10:22 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Re: WebService - What's wrong with this code?
Hold on VS buggy ?? My god, thats amazing news there was I thinking for a moment that M$oft had got it right at least once - fraid to say im most disappointed my world has surely shattered frankly I would advise everyone that can to use the Eclipse plugin rather than the IDE under Windows. I have experienced far fewer issues with Eclipse ;) But I have experienced SOME !
Im working with both VS.Net 2005 and Eclipse/Flex cant say that there have been any issues with WebServices AT-ALL categorically using actionscript. I must admit it wasnt easy but its a tad different getting use to asyncronous webservice calling though Flexs event model but I finally managed to make something very elegant and scalable. Obviously this isnt for the fainthearted and you might have to unlearn somethings from the VS world (as I did) to deal with the Flex logic.
If anyone is stuck, give me a shout..
Samuel
On 15/8/06 10:02, sinatosk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ah white spaces. convert that URL using urlencode can't remember the function/method name but it's around
thats might do the trick :p
On 14/08/06, Tom Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, Ben -
Your code works fine. My code, even after I manually edited to make it
identical to yours, does not. I can only conclude that Flex Builder is on
crack. Seriously, I went over it line by line... No differences except
whitespace. I hope this is not going to become a behavioral pattern in
Builder... I work with Visual Studio, and there's no room for more than one
buggy IDE in my life.
Thanks again,
-tom
-Original Message-
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com [mailto: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com ] On
Behalf Of ben.clinkinbeard
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 10:01 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: WebService - What's wrong with this code?
Does it compile for you without errors?
Yep, this exact code works for me.
?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8?
mx:Application xmlns:mx=http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml
layout=absolute creationComplete=init()
mx:Script
![CDATA[
import mx.rpc.soap.LoadEvent;
import mx.rpc.soap.WebService;
private function init():void
{
var myWebService:WebService;
myWebService = new WebService();
myWebService.loadWSDL(http://webservices.amazon.com/AWSECommerceService/AWS
ECommerceService.wsdl);
myWebService.addEventListener(load,
loadComplete);
}
private function loadComplete(event:LoadEvent):void
{
trace(ALL GOOD);
}
]]
/mx:Script
/mx:Application
-Original Message-
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com [mailto: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com ] On
Behalf Of ben.clinkinbeard
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 12:42 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: WebService - What's wrong with this code?
For your second example, if you wrap the lines other than the import
inside of a function it should work.
HTH,
Ben
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com , Tom Lee design@ wrote:
I can't figure this out for the life of me - I'm following other
people's
examples, but still getting errors. This must be something obvious.
Here's
my code (I've removed the actual WSDL url):
?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8?
mx:Application xmlns:mx=http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml
layout=absolute
mx:Script
![CDATA[
import mx.rpc.soap.WebService;
var myWebService:WebService;
function initWS(){
myWebService = new
WebService();
myWebService.loadWSDL(**);
}
]]
/mx:Script
/mx:Application
And here's my error:
1061: Call to a possibly undefined method loadWSDL through a
reference with
static type WebService. (Line 9)
I've tried a bunch of different stuff - here's another variation,
which
throws different errors:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8?
mx:Application xmlns:mx=http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml
layout=absolute
mx:Script
[flexcoders] Re: WebService - What's wrong with this code?
Here are a couple.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/messages/47267?threaded=1m=evar=1tidx=1
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/messages/46548?threaded=1m=evar=1tidx=1
I can confirm that I am working with an Adobe engineer to try and
resolve both issues (our company has a support contract with Adobe),
so they are listening and interested in fixing issues people are
having. I think thats a good sign.
Ben
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Samuel D. Colak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Umm Franck what issues with webservices?
On 15/8/06 20:00, Franck de Bruijn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That¹s exactly what Ben is hammering at.
It¹s too hard to get webservices up and running in a production-like
application easy. It¹s true that Adobe is focussing more on FDS
than on the
support for webservices, which is truely a pity. Let¹s hope it¹ll
change in
the (near) future. I already saw a good sign of an Adobe engineer
trying to
look into our problems.
Cheers,
Franck
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Samuel D. Colak
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 10:22 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Re: WebService - What's wrong with this
code?
Hold on VS buggy ?? My god, that¹s amazing news there was I
thinking for a
moment that M$oft had got it right at least once - fraid to say
im most
disappointed my world has surely shattered frankly I would
advise everyone
that can to use the Eclipse plugin rather than the IDE under
Windows. I have
experienced far fewer issues with Eclipse ;) But I have
experienced SOME !
Im working with both VS.Net 2005 and Eclipse/Flex cant say that
there have
been any issues with WebServices AT-ALL categorically using
actionscript. I
must admit it wasn¹t easy but its a tad different getting use to
asyncronous
webservice calling though Flex¹s event model but I finally managed
to make
something very elegant and scalable. Obviously this isnt for the
fainthearted
and you might have to unlearn somethings from the VS world (as I
did) to deal
with the Flex logic.
If anyone is stuck, give me a shout..
Samuel
On 15/8/06 10:02, sinatosk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ah white spaces. convert that URL using urlencode can't
remember the
function/method name but it's around
thats might do the trick :p
On 14/08/06, Tom Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, Ben -
Your code works fine. My code, even after I manually edited to
make it
identical to yours, does not. I can only conclude that Flex
Builder is on
crack. Seriously, I went over it line by line... No differences
except
whitespace. I hope this is not going to become a behavioral
pattern in
Builder... I work with Visual Studio, and there's no room for
more than one
buggy IDE in my life.
Thanks again,
-tom
-Original Message-
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
[mailto: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com ]
On
Behalf Of ben.clinkinbeard
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 10:01 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: WebService - What's wrong with this code?
Does it compile for you without errors?
Yep, this exact code works for me.
?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8?
mx:Application xmlns:mx=http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml;
layout=absolute creationComplete=init()
mx:Script
![CDATA[
import mx.rpc.soap.LoadEvent;
import mx.rpc.soap.WebService;
private function init():void
{
var myWebService:WebService;
myWebService = new WebService();
myWebService.loadWSDL(http://webservices.amazon.com/AWSECommerceService/AWS
ECommerceService.wsdl);
myWebService.addEventListener(load,
loadComplete);
}
private function loadComplete(event:LoadEvent):void
{
trace(ALL GOOD);
}
]]
/mx:Script
/mx:Application
-Original Message-
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
[mailto: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com ]
On
Behalf Of ben.clinkinbeard
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 12:42 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: WebService - What's wrong with this
code?
For your second example, if you wrap the lines other than the
import
inside of a function it should work.
HTH,
Ben
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com ,
Tom Lee design@ wrote:
I can't figure this out for the life of me - I'm following
other
people's
examples, but still getting errors. This must be something
obvious.
Here's
my code (I've removed the actual WSDL url):
?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8
RE: [flexcoders] Re: WebService - What's wrong with this code?
And my personal favorite:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/message/47493
-Original Message-
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of ben.clinkinbeard
Sent: Friday, August 18, 2006 10:50 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: WebService - What's wrong with this code?
Here are a couple.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/messages/47267?threaded=1m=evar=1
tidx=1
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/messages/46548?threaded=1m=evar=1
tidx=1
I can confirm that I am working with an Adobe engineer to try and
resolve both issues (our company has a support contract with Adobe),
so they are listening and interested in fixing issues people are
having. I think thats a good sign.
Ben
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Samuel D. Colak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Umm Franck what issues with webservices?
On 15/8/06 20:00, Franck de Bruijn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That¹s exactly what Ben is hammering at.
It¹s too hard to get webservices up and running in a production-like
application easy. It¹s true that Adobe is focussing more on FDS
than on the
support for webservices, which is truely a pity. Let¹s hope it¹ll
change in
the (near) future. I already saw a good sign of an Adobe engineer
trying to
look into our problems.
Cheers,
Franck
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Samuel D. Colak
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 10:22 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Re: WebService - What's wrong with this
code?
Hold on VS buggy ?? My god, that¹s amazing news there was I
thinking for a
moment that M$oft had got it right at least once - Œfraid to say
im most
disappointed my world has surely shattered frankly I would
advise everyone
that can to use the Eclipse plugin rather than the IDE under
Windows. I have
experienced far fewer issues with Eclipse ;) But I have
experienced SOME !
Im working with both VS.Net 2005 and Eclipse/Flex cant say that
there have
been any issues with WebServices AT-ALL categorically using
actionscript. I
must admit it wasn¹t easy but its a tad different getting use to
asyncronous
webservice calling though Flex¹s event model but I finally managed
to make
something very elegant and scalable. Obviously this isnt for the
fainthearted
and you might have to unlearn somethings from the VS world (as I
did) to deal
with the Flex logic.
If anyone is stuck, give me a shout..
Samuel
On 15/8/06 10:02, sinatosk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ah white spaces. convert that URL using urlencode can't
remember the
function/method name but it's around
thats might do the trick :p
On 14/08/06, Tom Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, Ben -
Your code works fine. My code, even after I manually edited to
make it
identical to yours, does not. I can only conclude that Flex
Builder is on
crack. Seriously, I went over it line by line... No differences
except
whitespace. I hope this is not going to become a behavioral
pattern in
Builder... I work with Visual Studio, and there's no room for
more than one
buggy IDE in my life.
Thanks again,
-tom
-Original Message-
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
[mailto: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com ]
On
Behalf Of ben.clinkinbeard
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 10:01 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: WebService - What's wrong with this code?
Does it compile for you without errors?
Yep, this exact code works for me.
?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8?
mx:Application xmlns:mx=http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml;
layout=absolute creationComplete=init()
mx:Script
![CDATA[
import mx.rpc.soap.LoadEvent;
import mx.rpc.soap.WebService;
private function init():void
{
var myWebService:WebService;
myWebService = new WebService();
myWebService.loadWSDL(http://webservices.amazon.com/AWSECommerceService/AWS
ECommerceService.wsdl);
myWebService.addEventListener(load,
loadComplete);
}
private function loadComplete(event:LoadEvent):void
{
trace(ALL GOOD);
}
]]
/mx:Script
/mx:Application
-Original Message-
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
[mailto: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com ]
On
Behalf Of ben.clinkinbeard
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 12:42 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: WebService - What's wrong with this
code?
For your second example, if you wrap the lines other than the
import
inside of a function it should work.
HTH,
Ben
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
RE: [flexcoders] Re: WebService - What's wrong with this code?
And today this one came in:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/message/47827
What I sense is that most of the problems are somehow related to DOC/Literal
versus RPC/Encoded, but of course I cannot be sure.
I'm exposing my webservices both via DOC/Literal and RPC/Encoded. These
webservices take a variety of arguments and also return a variety of
results. With variety I mean from simple primitive types, to complex objects
nested within complex objects containing arrays of Strings.
Via RPC/Encoded everything works as a charm (I'm using the Apache AXIS
engine), but via DOC/Literal issues arise.
Cheers,
Franck
-Original Message-
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom Lee
Sent: Friday, August 18, 2006 5:16 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Re: WebService - What's wrong with this code?
And my personal favorite:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/message/47493
-Original Message-
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of ben.clinkinbeard
Sent: Friday, August 18, 2006 10:50 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: WebService - What's wrong with this code?
Here are a couple.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/messages/47267?threaded=1m=evar=1
tidx=1
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/messages/46548?threaded=1m=evar=1
tidx=1
I can confirm that I am working with an Adobe engineer to try and
resolve both issues (our company has a support contract with Adobe),
so they are listening and interested in fixing issues people are
having. I think thats a good sign.
Ben
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Samuel D. Colak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Umm Franck what issues with webservices?
On 15/8/06 20:00, Franck de Bruijn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That¹s exactly what Ben is hammering at.
It¹s too hard to get webservices up and running in a production-like
application easy. It¹s true that Adobe is focussing more on FDS
than on the
support for webservices, which is truely a pity. Let¹s hope it¹ll
change in
the (near) future. I already saw a good sign of an Adobe engineer
trying to
look into our problems.
Cheers,
Franck
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Samuel D. Colak
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 10:22 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Re: WebService - What's wrong with this
code?
Hold on VS buggy ?? My god, that¹s amazing news there was I
thinking for a
moment that M$oft had got it right at least once - Œfraid to say
im most
disappointed my world has surely shattered frankly I would
advise everyone
that can to use the Eclipse plugin rather than the IDE under
Windows. I have
experienced far fewer issues with Eclipse ;) But I have
experienced SOME !
Im working with both VS.Net 2005 and Eclipse/Flex cant say that
there have
been any issues with WebServices AT-ALL categorically using
actionscript. I
must admit it wasn¹t easy but its a tad different getting use to
asyncronous
webservice calling though Flex¹s event model but I finally managed
to make
something very elegant and scalable. Obviously this isnt for the
fainthearted
and you might have to unlearn somethings from the VS world (as I
did) to deal
with the Flex logic.
If anyone is stuck, give me a shout..
Samuel
On 15/8/06 10:02, sinatosk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ah white spaces. convert that URL using urlencode can't
remember the
function/method name but it's around
thats might do the trick :p
On 14/08/06, Tom Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, Ben -
Your code works fine. My code, even after I manually edited to
make it
identical to yours, does not. I can only conclude that Flex
Builder is on
crack. Seriously, I went over it line by line... No differences
except
whitespace. I hope this is not going to become a behavioral
pattern in
Builder... I work with Visual Studio, and there's no room for
more than one
buggy IDE in my life.
Thanks again,
-tom
-Original Message-
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
[mailto: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com ]
On
Behalf Of ben.clinkinbeard
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 10:01 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: WebService - What's wrong with this code?
Does it compile for you without errors?
Yep, this exact code works for me.
?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8?
mx:Application xmlns:mx=http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml;
layout=absolute creationComplete=init()
mx:Script
![CDATA[
import mx.rpc.soap.LoadEvent;
import mx.rpc.soap.WebService;
private function init():void
{
var myWebService:WebService;
myWebService = new WebService
Re: [flexcoders] Re: WebService - What's wrong with this code?
ah white spaces. convert that URL using urlencode can't remember the function/method name but it's aroundthats might do the trick :pOn 14/08/06,
Tom Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, Ben -
Your code works fine. My code, even after I manually edited to make it
identical to yours, does not. I can only conclude that Flex Builder is on
crack. Seriously, I went over it line by line... No differences except
whitespace. I hope this is not going to become a behavioral pattern in
Builder... I work with Visual Studio, and there's no room for more than one
buggy IDE in my life.
Thanks again,
-tom
-Original Message-
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:
flexcoders@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of ben.clinkinbeard
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 10:01 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: WebService - What's wrong with this code?
Does it compile for you without errors?
Yep, this exact code works for me.
?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8?
mx:Application xmlns:mx=http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml
layout=absolute creationComplete=init()
mx:Script
![CDATA[
import mx.rpc.soap.LoadEvent;
import mx.rpc.soap.WebService;
private function init():void
{
var myWebService:WebService;
myWebService = new WebService();
myWebService.loadWSDL(http://webservices.amazon.com/AWSECommerceService/AWS
ECommerceService.wsdl);
myWebService.addEventListener(load,
loadComplete);
}
private function loadComplete(event:LoadEvent):void
{
trace(ALL GOOD);
}
]]
/mx:Script
/mx:Application
-Original Message-
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:
flexcoders@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of ben.clinkinbeard
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 12:42 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: WebService - What's wrong with this code?
For your second example, if you wrap the lines other than the import
inside of a function it should work.
HTH,
Ben
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Tom Lee design@ wrote:
I can't figure this out for the life of me - I'm following other
people's
examples, but still getting errors. This must be something obvious.
Here's
my code (I've removed the actual WSDL url):
?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8?
mx:Application xmlns:mx=http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml
layout=absolute
mx:Script
![CDATA[
import mx.rpc.soap.WebService;
var myWebService:WebService;
function initWS(){
myWebService = new
WebService();
myWebService.loadWSDL(**);
}
]]
/mx:Script
/mx:Application
And here's my error:
1061: Call to a possibly undefined method loadWSDL through a
reference with
static type WebService. (Line 9)
I've tried a bunch of different stuff - here's another variation,
which
throws different errors:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8?
mx:Application xmlns:mx=http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml
layout=absolute
mx:Script
![CDATA[
import mx.rpc.soap.WebService;
var myWebService:WebService;
myWebService = new WebService();
myWebService.loadWSDL(**);
]]
/mx:Script
/mx:Application
And the errors:
1120: Access of undefined property myWebService. (Lines 8 9)
Thanks!
- tom
--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
Yahoo! Groups Links
--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
Yahoo! Groups Links
__._,_.___
--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
SPONSORED LINKS
Web site design development
Computer software development
Software design and development
Macromedia flex
Re: [flexcoders] Re: WebService - What's wrong with this code?
Title: Re: [flexcoders] Re: WebService - What's wrong with this code?
Hold on VS buggy ?? My god, thats amazing news there was I thinking for a moment that M$oft had got it right at least once - fraid to say im most disappointed my world has surely shattered frankly I would advise everyone that can to use the Eclipse plugin rather than the IDE under Windows. I have experienced far fewer issues with Eclipse ;) But I have experienced SOME !
Im working with both VS.Net 2005 and Eclipse/Flex cant say that there have been any issues with WebServices AT-ALL categorically using actionscript. I must admit it wasnt easy but its a tad different getting use to asyncronous webservice calling though Flexs event model but I finally managed to make something very elegant and scalable. Obviously this isnt for the fainthearted and you might have to unlearn somethings from the VS world (as I did) to deal with the Flex logic.
If anyone is stuck, give me a shout..
Samuel
On 15/8/06 10:02, sinatosk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ah white spaces. convert that URL using urlencode can't remember the function/method name but it's around
thats might do the trick :p
On 14/08/06, Tom Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, Ben -
Your code works fine. My code, even after I manually edited to make it
identical to yours, does not. I can only conclude that Flex Builder is on
crack. Seriously, I went over it line by line... No differences except
whitespace. I hope this is not going to become a behavioral pattern in
Builder... I work with Visual Studio, and there's no room for more than one
buggy IDE in my life.
Thanks again,
-tom
-Original Message-
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com [mailto: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com ] On
Behalf Of ben.clinkinbeard
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 10:01 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: WebService - What's wrong with this code?
Does it compile for you without errors?
Yep, this exact code works for me.
?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8?
mx:Application xmlns:mx=http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml
layout=absolute creationComplete=init()
mx:Script
![CDATA[
import mx.rpc.soap.LoadEvent;
import mx.rpc.soap.WebService;
private function init():void
{
var myWebService:WebService;
myWebService = new WebService();
myWebService.loadWSDL(http://webservices.amazon.com/AWSECommerceService/AWS
ECommerceService.wsdl);
myWebService.addEventListener(load,
loadComplete);
}
private function loadComplete(event:LoadEvent):void
{
trace(ALL GOOD);
}
]]
/mx:Script
/mx:Application
-Original Message-
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com [mailto: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com ] On
Behalf Of ben.clinkinbeard
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 12:42 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: WebService - What's wrong with this code?
For your second example, if you wrap the lines other than the import
inside of a function it should work.
HTH,
Ben
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com , Tom Lee design@ wrote:
I can't figure this out for the life of me - I'm following other
people's
examples, but still getting errors. This must be something obvious.
Here's
my code (I've removed the actual WSDL url):
?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8?
mx:Application xmlns:mx=http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml
layout=absolute
mx:Script
![CDATA[
import mx.rpc.soap.WebService;
var myWebService:WebService;
function initWS(){
myWebService = new
WebService();
myWebService.loadWSDL(**);
}
]]
/mx:Script
/mx:Application
And here's my error:
1061: Call to a possibly undefined method loadWSDL through a
reference with
static type WebService. (Line 9)
I've tried a bunch of different stuff - here's another variation,
which
throws different errors:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8?
mx:Application xmlns:mx=http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml
layout=absolute
mx:Script
![CDATA[
import mx.rpc.soap.WebService;
var myWebService:WebService;
myWebService = new WebService();
myWebService.loadWSDL(**);
]]
/mx:Script
/mx:Application
And the errors:
1120: Access of undefined property myWebService. (Lines 8 9)
Thanks!
- tom
--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
Yahoo! Groups Links
--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group
RE: [flexcoders] Re: WebService - What's wrong with this code?
Thanks, Ben -
Your code works fine. My code, even after I manually edited to make it
identical to yours, does not. I can only conclude that Flex Builder is on
crack. Seriously, I went over it line by line... No differences except
whitespace. I hope this is not going to become a behavioral pattern in
Builder... I work with Visual Studio, and there's no room for more than one
buggy IDE in my life.
Thanks again,
-tom
-Original Message-
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of ben.clinkinbeard
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 10:01 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: WebService - What's wrong with this code?
Does it compile for you without errors?
Yep, this exact code works for me.
?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8?
mx:Application xmlns:mx=http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml;
layout=absolute creationComplete=init()
mx:Script
![CDATA[
import mx.rpc.soap.LoadEvent;
import mx.rpc.soap.WebService;
private function init():void
{
var myWebService:WebService;
myWebService = new WebService();
myWebService.loadWSDL(http://webservices.amazon.com/AWSECommerceService/AWS
ECommerceService.wsdl);
myWebService.addEventListener(load,
loadComplete);
}
private function loadComplete(event:LoadEvent):void
{
trace(ALL GOOD);
}
]]
/mx:Script
/mx:Application
-Original Message-
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of ben.clinkinbeard
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 12:42 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: WebService - What's wrong with this code?
For your second example, if you wrap the lines other than the import
inside of a function it should work.
HTH,
Ben
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Tom Lee design@ wrote:
I can't figure this out for the life of me - I'm following other
people's
examples, but still getting errors. This must be something obvious.
Here's
my code (I've removed the actual WSDL url):
?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8?
mx:Application xmlns:mx=http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml;
layout=absolute
mx:Script
![CDATA[
import mx.rpc.soap.WebService;
var myWebService:WebService;
function initWS(){
myWebService = new
WebService();
myWebService.loadWSDL(**);
}
]]
/mx:Script
/mx:Application
And here's my error:
1061: Call to a possibly undefined method loadWSDL through a
reference with
static type WebService. (Line 9)
I've tried a bunch of different stuff - here's another variation,
which
throws different errors:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8?
mx:Application xmlns:mx=http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml;
layout=absolute
mx:Script
![CDATA[
import mx.rpc.soap.WebService;
var myWebService:WebService;
myWebService = new WebService();
myWebService.loadWSDL(**);
]]
/mx:Script
/mx:Application
And the errors:
1120: Access of undefined property myWebService. (Lines 8 9)
Thanks!
- tom
--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
Yahoo! Groups Links
--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
Yahoo! Groups Links
--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/
* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http
Re: [flexcoders] Re: WebService - What's wrong with this code?
your code is correct because I do that myself and works fine ... with a little difference the wsdl I use is always the same so I set it inside the property wsdl :p instead of passing it through the method loadWSDL.
I know it's not much of a help but heres what I do as a debug testprivate function init_wsdl():void{ ws = new WebService(); ws.wsdl = '
http://www.domain.com/path/to/wsdl'; ws.addEventListener(FaultEvent.FAULT, fault_handler); ws.addEventListener('load', load_handler); ws.loadWSDL();}private function load_handler(event:LoadEvent):void
{ trace('webservice load complete');}private function fault_handler(event:FaultEvent):void{ trace(event.fault.faultString);}On 12/08/06,
ben.clinkinbeard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does it compile for you without errors?
Yep, this exact code works for me.
?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8?
mx:Application xmlns:mx=http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml
layout=absolute creationComplete=init()
mx:Script
![CDATA[
import mx.rpc.soap.LoadEvent;
import mx.rpc.soap.WebService;
private function init():void
{
var myWebService:WebService;
myWebService = new WebService();
myWebService.loadWSDL(http://webservices.amazon.com/AWSECommerceService/AWSECommerceService.wsdl
);
myWebService.addEventListener(load, loadComplete);
}
private function loadComplete(event:LoadEvent):void
{
trace(ALL GOOD);
}
]]
/mx:Script
/mx:Application
-Original Message-
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:
flexcoders@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of ben.clinkinbeard
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 12:42 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: WebService - What's wrong with this code?
For your second example, if you wrap the lines other than the import
inside of a function it should work.
HTH,
Ben
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Tom Lee design@ wrote:
I can't figure this out for the life of me - I'm following other
people's
examples, but still getting errors. This must be something obvious.
Here's
my code (I've removed the actual WSDL url):
?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8?
mx:Application xmlns:mx=http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml
layout=absolute
mx:Script
![CDATA[
import mx.rpc.soap.WebService;
var myWebService:WebService;
function initWS(){
myWebService = new
WebService();
myWebService.loadWSDL(**);
}
]]
/mx:Script
/mx:Application
And here's my error:
1061: Call to a possibly undefined method loadWSDL through a
reference with
static type WebService. (Line 9)
I've tried a bunch of different stuff - here's another variation,
which
throws different errors:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8?
mx:Application xmlns:mx=http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml
layout=absolute
mx:Script
![CDATA[
import mx.rpc.soap.WebService;
var myWebService:WebService;
myWebService = new WebService();
myWebService.loadWSDL(**);
]]
/mx:Script
/mx:Application
And the errors:
1120: Access of undefined property myWebService. (Lines 8 9)
Thanks!
- tom
--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
Yahoo! Groups Links
__._,_.___
--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
SPONSORED LINKS
Web site design development
Computer software development
Software design and development
Macromedia flex
Software development best practice
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
Visit your group "flexcoders" on the web.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
__,_._,___
[flexcoders] Re: WebService - What's wrong with this code?
For your second example, if you wrap the lines other than the import
inside of a function it should work.
HTH,
Ben
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Tom Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't figure this out for the life of me - I'm following other
people's
examples, but still getting errors. This must be something obvious.
Here's
my code (I've removed the actual WSDL url):
?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8?
mx:Application xmlns:mx=http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml;
layout=absolute
mx:Script
![CDATA[
import mx.rpc.soap.WebService;
var myWebService:WebService;
function initWS(){
myWebService = new
WebService();
myWebService.loadWSDL(**);
}
]]
/mx:Script
/mx:Application
And here's my error:
1061: Call to a possibly undefined method loadWSDL through a
reference with
static type WebService. (Line 9)
I've tried a bunch of different stuff - here's another variation, which
throws different errors:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8?
mx:Application xmlns:mx=http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml;
layout=absolute
mx:Script
![CDATA[
import mx.rpc.soap.WebService;
var myWebService:WebService;
myWebService = new WebService();
myWebService.loadWSDL(**);
]]
/mx:Script
/mx:Application
And the errors:
1120: Access of undefined property myWebService. (Lines 8 9)
Thanks!
- tom
--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/
* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
RE: [flexcoders] Re: WebService - What's wrong with this code?
Thanks Ben, but no such luck - I get the same error as in my first example.
Does it compile for you without errors?
-Original Message-
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of ben.clinkinbeard
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 12:42 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: WebService - What's wrong with this code?
For your second example, if you wrap the lines other than the import
inside of a function it should work.
HTH,
Ben
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Tom Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't figure this out for the life of me - I'm following other
people's
examples, but still getting errors. This must be something obvious.
Here's
my code (I've removed the actual WSDL url):
?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8?
mx:Application xmlns:mx=http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml;
layout=absolute
mx:Script
![CDATA[
import mx.rpc.soap.WebService;
var myWebService:WebService;
function initWS(){
myWebService = new
WebService();
myWebService.loadWSDL(**);
}
]]
/mx:Script
/mx:Application
And here's my error:
1061: Call to a possibly undefined method loadWSDL through a
reference with
static type WebService. (Line 9)
I've tried a bunch of different stuff - here's another variation, which
throws different errors:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8?
mx:Application xmlns:mx=http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml;
layout=absolute
mx:Script
![CDATA[
import mx.rpc.soap.WebService;
var myWebService:WebService;
myWebService = new WebService();
myWebService.loadWSDL(**);
]]
/mx:Script
/mx:Application
And the errors:
1120: Access of undefined property myWebService. (Lines 8 9)
Thanks!
- tom
--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
Yahoo! Groups Links
--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/
* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[flexcoders] Re: WebService - What's wrong with this code?
Does it compile for you without errors?
Yep, this exact code works for me.
?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8?
mx:Application xmlns:mx=http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml;
layout=absolute creationComplete=init()
mx:Script
![CDATA[
import mx.rpc.soap.LoadEvent;
import mx.rpc.soap.WebService;
private function init():void
{
var myWebService:WebService;
myWebService = new WebService();
myWebService.loadWSDL(http://webservices.amazon.com/AWSECommerceService/AWSECommerceService.wsdl;);
myWebService.addEventListener(load,
loadComplete);
}
private function loadComplete(event:LoadEvent):void
{
trace(ALL GOOD);
}
]]
/mx:Script
/mx:Application
-Original Message-
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of ben.clinkinbeard
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 12:42 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: WebService - What's wrong with this code?
For your second example, if you wrap the lines other than the import
inside of a function it should work.
HTH,
Ben
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Tom Lee design@ wrote:
I can't figure this out for the life of me - I'm following other
people's
examples, but still getting errors. This must be something obvious.
Here's
my code (I've removed the actual WSDL url):
?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8?
mx:Application xmlns:mx=http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml;
layout=absolute
mx:Script
![CDATA[
import mx.rpc.soap.WebService;
var myWebService:WebService;
function initWS(){
myWebService = new
WebService();
myWebService.loadWSDL(**);
}
]]
/mx:Script
/mx:Application
And here's my error:
1061: Call to a possibly undefined method loadWSDL through a
reference with
static type WebService. (Line 9)
I've tried a bunch of different stuff - here's another variation,
which
throws different errors:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8?
mx:Application xmlns:mx=http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml;
layout=absolute
mx:Script
![CDATA[
import mx.rpc.soap.WebService;
var myWebService:WebService;
myWebService = new WebService();
myWebService.loadWSDL(**);
]]
/mx:Script
/mx:Application
And the errors:
1120: Access of undefined property myWebService. (Lines 8 9)
Thanks!
- tom
--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
Yahoo! Groups Links
--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/
* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
