Re: [flexcoders] FlexBuilder & FDT I don' git it....
On Tuesday 02 Sep 2008, Alan wrote: > Hell, I try to code as much as possible in Textmate ( ill post about > this ). I want to write my own code - not big brother writing it for > me. If you can't see the benefit of being able to type foo.bar and have it save you the time of writing foo.barrelsRoundIsABitOfALongPropertyNameIsntIt and the import for the type, then yeah, use whatever... You can always turn of the insight etc. features in Builder, and just use the syntax highlight, but it seems a waste. XSD4MXML gives you just the syntax highlight for free. > Plus, for me, that's the best way to learn an API - by having to > know the components and their respective utilization. I wouldn't want to be bogged down in details like import statements and weather to use UK or US spellings of property names. -- Tom Chiverton This email is sent for and on behalf of Halliwells LLP. Halliwells LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales under registered number OC307980 whose registered office address is at Halliwells LLP, 3 Hardman Square, Spinningfields, Manchester, M3 3EB. A list of members is available for inspection at the registered office. Any reference to a partner in relation to Halliwells LLP means a member of Halliwells LLP. Regulated by The Solicitors Regulation Authority. CONFIDENTIALITY This email is intended only for the use of the addressee named above and may be confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the addressee you must not read it and must not use any information contained in nor copy it nor inform any person other than Halliwells LLP or the addressee of its existence or contents. If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify Halliwells LLP IT Department on 0870 365 2500. For more information about Halliwells LLP visit www.halliwells.com. -- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.comYahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [flexcoders] FlexBuilder & FDT I don' git it....
With Eclipse you have complete control to close any windows you want open, eh? Funny you mentioned DW. Flex Builder 1/1.5 was built on DW and it totally sucked. As I recall, most folks at the time switched to Eclipse then already. DK On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 9:52 PM, Sherif Abdou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Ya i agree. I also Hate the Eclipse IDE, it's like they are having a > race to see how many Windows they could have. The Flex IDE would have been > perfect if it had the look and feel of the Flash IDE or Dreamweaver CS4(The > BEta one). I tried FlashDevelop and I don't think they support Debugging so > that was out. > -- > Sherif Abdou > http://VadexFX.com > http://Sherifabdou.com > > - Original Message - > *From:* Alan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > *To:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > *Sent:* Monday, September 01, 2008 8:34 PM > *Subject:* [flexcoders] FlexBuilder & FDT I don' git it > > So all the huff n puff goin' on, I've been playing with FDT and also > googled about it - and found Jesse's blog post > > http://flashartofwar.com/2008/04/24/flexbuilder-3-vs-fdt-3/ > > So far all I can gather is that FDT is just a different IDE for Flex. > Does it just have more bells and whistles? Jesse mentioned in his > post about templates and code hinting... > > That's the LAST thing I want. > > Hell, I try to code as much as possible in Textmate ( ill post about > this ). I want to write my own code - not big brother writing it for > me. Plus, for me, that's the best way to learn an API - by having to > know the components and their respective utilization. > > I mean right...? > > Alan > > > -- Douglas Knudsen http://www.cubicleman.com this is my signature, like it?
Re: [flexcoders] FlexBuilder & FDT I don' git it....
Ya i agree. I also Hate the Eclipse IDE, it's like they are having a race to see how many Windows they could have. The Flex IDE would have been perfect if it had the look and feel of the Flash IDE or Dreamweaver CS4(The BEta one). I tried FlashDevelop and I don't think they support Debugging so that was out. -- Sherif Abdou http://VadexFX.com http://Sherifabdou.com - Original Message - From: Alan To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, September 01, 2008 8:34 PM Subject: [flexcoders] FlexBuilder & FDT I don' git it So all the huff n puff goin' on, I've been playing with FDT and also googled about it - and found Jesse's blog post http://flashartofwar.com/2008/04/24/flexbuilder-3-vs-fdt-3/ So far all I can gather is that FDT is just a different IDE for Flex. Does it just have more bells and whistles? Jesse mentioned in his post about templates and code hinting... That's the LAST thing I want. Hell, I try to code as much as possible in Textmate ( ill post about this ). I want to write my own code - not big brother writing it for me. Plus, for me, that's the best way to learn an API - by having to know the components and their respective utilization. I mean right...? Alan
[flexcoders] FlexBuilder & FDT I don' git it....
So all the huff n puff goin' on, I've been playing with FDT and also googled about it - and found Jesse's blog post http://flashartofwar.com/2008/04/24/flexbuilder-3-vs-fdt-3/ So far all I can gather is that FDT is just a different IDE for Flex. Does it just have more bells and whistles? Jesse mentioned in his post about templates and code hinting... That's the LAST thing I want. Hell, I try to code as much as possible in Textmate ( ill post about this ). I want to write my own code - not big brother writing it for me. Plus, for me, that's the best way to learn an API - by having to know the components and their respective utilization. I mean right...? Alan
