Re: [flexcoders] Re: Adobe.com Servers?
Janis Radins wrote: > Oh comon. Adobe.com is slow for you for two minth? > It's been slow as hell from here (eastern europe) all the time for years > now, totally unusable. That's consistent with what David Hatch, of the Adobe web team, described... the San Jose servers have already been updated, and the Dublin servers are now including these changes. http://weblogs.macromedia.com/dhatch/archives/2007/01/hi_all_since_th.cfm I suspect that this will be a continual battle, though, as transfer rates continue to increase... during late December the Photoshop CS3 preview alone was responsible for about as much traffic each day as the entire US Library of Congress holds, so the architecture has to be continually updated: http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2006/12/photoshop_cs3_1.html jd -- John Dowdell . Adobe Developer Support . San Francisco CA USA Weblog: http://weblogs.macromedia.com/jd Aggregator: http://weblogs.macromedia.com/mxna Technotes: http://www.macromedia.com/support/ Spam killed my private email -- public record is best, thanks.
Re: [flexcoders] Re: Adobe.com Servers?
Oh comon. Adobe.com is slow for you for two minth? It's been slow as hell from here (eastern europe) all the time for years now, totally unusable. 2007/2/2, purcept <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Thanks very much. I'll do that. Don --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com , John Dowdell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > purcept wrote: > > Why have the Adobe.com servers been so Slow and Erratic over the last > > couple months? Any time I go there for Flex info, I always have to > > Refresh at least once. I've asked around, but no one seems to know. > > David Hatch of the web team posted a status update a few weeks ago. If > you're seeing performance which is not satisfactory, could you forward > it either there or at the feedback widget on each adobe.com webpage, so > that the info gets directly to those who do the work? Thanks. > http://weblogs.macromedia.com/dhatch/archives/2007/01/hi_all_since_th .cfm > > tx, > jd > > > > > -- > John Dowdell . Adobe Developer Support . San Francisco CA USA > Weblog: http://weblogs.macromedia.com/jd > Aggregator: http://weblogs.macromedia.com/mxna > Technotes: http://www.macromedia.com/support/ > Spam killed my private email -- public record is best, thanks. >
[flexcoders] Re: Adobe.com Servers?
Thanks very much. I'll do that. Don --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, John Dowdell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > purcept wrote: > > Why have the Adobe.com servers been so Slow and Erratic over the last > > couple months? Any time I go there for Flex info, I always have to > > Refresh at least once. I've asked around, but no one seems to know. > > David Hatch of the web team posted a status update a few weeks ago. If > you're seeing performance which is not satisfactory, could you forward > it either there or at the feedback widget on each adobe.com webpage, so > that the info gets directly to those who do the work? Thanks. > http://weblogs.macromedia.com/dhatch/archives/2007/01/hi_all_since_th .cfm > > tx, > jd > > > > > -- > John Dowdell . Adobe Developer Support . San Francisco CA USA > Weblog: http://weblogs.macromedia.com/jd > Aggregator: http://weblogs.macromedia.com/mxna > Technotes: http://www.macromedia.com/support/ > Spam killed my private email -- public record is best, thanks. >
[flexcoders] Re: Adobe.com Servers?
... also, I get a "Cannot find server or DNS Error Internet Explorer" about half the time. Could there be some kind of DNS congestion or problem? Don --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Matt Chotin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Where are you located? We've made some changes to get adobe.com faster > actually, but have noticed some slowdowns on certain things. I was > recently told we're serving close to 600 Mbs right now, especially since > Lightroom just launched, so we push out a fair amount of data :-) > > > > Matt > > > > > > From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of purcept > Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 11:10 AM > To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [flexcoders] Adobe.com Servers? > > > > Why have the Adobe.com servers been so Slow and Erratic over the last > couple months? Any time I go there for Flex info, I always have to > Refresh at least once. I've asked around, but no one seems to know. >
[flexcoders] Re: Adobe.com Servers?
Matt I'm located in Dayto Ohio. See my "tracert" below. This has been going on consistently for at least 2 months, if not more. - --- 1 7 ms 7 ms 7 ms * 2 9 ms 9 ms 8 ms dist1-vlan50.dytnoh.ameritech.net [65.43.25.226] 3 9 ms 7 ms 7 ms bb2-g1-0.dytnoh.ameritech.net [65.43.25.100] 416 ms16 ms16 ms bb2-g5-1.sfldmi.sbcglobal.net [151.164.93.93] 522 ms22 ms22 ms core2-p7-0.crchil.sbcglobal.net [151.164.43.195] 622 ms22 ms22 ms bb1-p3-1.emhril.sbcglobal.net [151.164.43.254] 722 ms23 ms22 ms bb2-p0-0.emhril.sbcglobal.net [151.164.43.253] 825 ms23 ms23 ms ex2-p5-0.eqchil.sbcglobal.net [151.164.42.139] 924 ms23 ms23 ms gar8-p390.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.122.79.89] 1068 ms68 ms68 ms tbr1033101.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.122.85.98] 1166 ms66 ms66 ms tbr1-cl1.sffca.ip.att.net [12.122.10.6] 1268 ms68 ms68 ms 12.123.12.57 13 249 ms 260 ms 228 ms ge4-2.3.cr02.sjo01.pccwbtn.net [12.119.139.18] 1467 ms66 ms66 ms 192.150.18.11 1566 ms66 ms66 ms 192.150.18.60 - --- --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Matt Chotin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Where are you located? We've made some changes to get adobe.com faster > actually, but have noticed some slowdowns on certain things. I was > recently told we're serving close to 600 Mbs right now, especially since > Lightroom just launched, so we push out a fair amount of data :-) > > > > Matt > > > > > > From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of purcept > Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 11:10 AM > To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [flexcoders] Adobe.com Servers? > > > > Why have the Adobe.com servers been so Slow and Erratic over the last > couple months? Any time I go there for Flex info, I always have to > Refresh at least once. I've asked around, but no one seems to know. >
