D]
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Hoff
> > Sent: 17 April 2006 19:08
> > To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Cairngorm2 Command
, UK
p: +44 (0) 131 338 6108
m: +44 (0) 7917 428 947
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Hoff
> Sent: 17 April 2006 19:08
> To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [flexcoders] Re
want a Delegate to be a singleton to be utilized from a command,
so that
> makes perfect sense; good idea!
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Tim Hoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 1:23 PM
> Subject: [flexcoder
17 April 2006 18:24
> To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Cairngorm2 Commands and Singletons
>
> That's what I thought Jester. So the problem is not with the
> commands but rather with the delegates. The samples provided
> similar c
the use cases you'd
want a Delegate to be a singleton to be utilized from a command, so that
makes perfect sense; good idea!
- Original Message -
From: "Tim Hoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 1:23 PM
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Cairngorm2 Co
That's what I thought Jester. So the problem is not with the
commands but rather with the delegates. The samples provided
similar code to this:
var delegate : GetAuthorsDelegate = new GetAuthorsDelegate();
I'll make these singletons and see if that clears up the problem.
Thanks,
- TH
-
6 matches
Mail list logo
